• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估主动和被动吸烟者的非刺激性唾液流率、IgA 和临床口腔干燥情况。

An assessment of unstimulated salivary flow rate, IgA and clinical oral dryness among active and passive smokers.

机构信息

Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine, Karachi, Pakistan (Department of Oral Pathology).

Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine, Karachi, Pakistan (Department of Pathology).

出版信息

Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2022 Feb 15;35(1):39-51. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01829. Epub 2021 Sep 17.

DOI:10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01829
PMID:34569554
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10464801/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of smoking on the whole salivary flow rate (SFR), IgA levels and clinical oral dryness (COD) among active and passive smokers.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The participants were categorized as active smokers (N = 54) or passive smokers (N = 163). Saliva was collected in tubes and placed in ice storage at -70°C. Salivary IgA levels were assessed in duplication using the enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method. Following the saliva sample collection, the subjects were assessed for COD using the COD score, SFR and caries. Chi-square test, the t-test and ANOVA were employed to compare the clinical impact of the smoking status associated with specific variables (smoking status, number of cigarettes, active caries, gender, age, COD score, IgA level and SFR). A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Two hundred and seventeen subjects with the mean age of 32.86±6.30 years, with 145 males (66.8%) and 72 females (33.2%), were included in the study. Among the active smokers, 88.8% were males compared to 11.2% females. The active smokers had the mean age of 32.52 years, a COD score of 1.43, an IgA level of 1.39 g/l, and a SFR of 0.37 ml/min. Among the passive smokers, 59.5% were males and 40.5% were females, with the mean age of 32.97 years, a COD score of 0.87 g/l, an IgA level of 1.47, and a SFR of 0.42 ml/min. Active caries showed a positive correlation with the number of cigarettes, with significance in the >35 years age group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrated significant differences in SFR, IgA and COD scores among the active and passive smokers. The number of cigarettes had a negative impact on saliva production, IgA levels, the oral health status, and the progression of caries with respect to age and gender. Smoking potentially leads to xerostomia associated with active caries. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2022;35(1):39-51.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估吸烟对主动吸烟者和被动吸烟者的全唾液流速(SFR)、IgA 水平和临床口腔干燥(COD)的影响。

材料与方法

将参与者分为主动吸烟者(N=54)或被动吸烟者(N=163)。收集唾液并置于-70°C 的冰储存管中。使用酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)方法重复评估唾液 IgA 水平。收集唾液样本后,使用 COD 评分、SFR 和龋齿评估受试者的 COD。采用卡方检验、t 检验和方差分析比较与吸烟状况相关的特定变量(吸烟状况、吸烟支数、活动性龋齿、性别、年龄、COD 评分、IgA 水平和 SFR)的临床影响。p 值<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

共有 217 名平均年龄为 32.86±6.30 岁的受试者(145 名男性,占 66.8%;72 名女性,占 33.2%)纳入研究。主动吸烟者中,88.8%为男性,11.2%为女性。主动吸烟者的平均年龄为 32.52 岁,COD 评分为 1.43,IgA 水平为 1.39 g/l,SFR 为 0.37 ml/min。被动吸烟者中,59.5%为男性,40.5%为女性,平均年龄为 32.97 岁,COD 评分为 0.87 g/l,IgA 水平为 1.47,SFR 为 0.42 ml/min。主动龋齿与吸烟支数呈正相关,在>35 岁年龄组有统计学意义(p<0.05)。

结论

本研究表明,主动吸烟者和被动吸烟者的 SFR、IgA 和 COD 评分存在显著差异。吸烟支数对唾液产生、IgA 水平、口腔健康状况和龋齿进展有负面影响,且与年龄和性别有关。吸烟可能导致与活动性龋齿相关的口干。国际职业医学与环境卫生杂志。2022;35(1):39-51。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcb3/10464801/4c5b049522c2/ijomeh-35-39-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcb3/10464801/4c5b049522c2/ijomeh-35-39-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcb3/10464801/4c5b049522c2/ijomeh-35-39-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
An assessment of unstimulated salivary flow rate, IgA and clinical oral dryness among active and passive smokers.评估主动和被动吸烟者的非刺激性唾液流率、IgA 和临床口腔干燥情况。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2022 Feb 15;35(1):39-51. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01829. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
2
Acute effects of black currant consumption on salivary flow rate and secretion rate of salivary immunoglobulin a in healthy smokers.食用黑加仑对健康吸烟者唾液流速和唾液免疫球蛋白A分泌率的急性影响。
J Med Food. 2015 Apr;18(4):483-8. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2013.0149. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
3
Effect of Long-term Smoking on Whole-mouth Salivary Flow Rate and Oral Health.长期吸烟对全口唾液流速和口腔健康的影响。
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2010 Fall;4(4):110-4. doi: 10.5681/joddd.2010.028. Epub 2010 Dec 21.
4
Studies on the prevalence of reduced salivary flow rate in relation to general health and dental caries, and effect of iron supplementation.唾液流速降低与总体健康及龋齿相关性的患病率研究以及铁补充剂的效果
Swed Dent J Suppl. 2007(192):3-50, 2 p preceding table of contents.
5
The changes on salivary flow rates, buffering capacity and chromogranin A levels in adults after bariatric surgery.成年人在接受减肥手术后唾液流量、缓冲能力和嗜铬粒蛋白 A 水平的变化。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Feb 21;28(3):159. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05551-3.
6
Comparison of Salivary Flow Rate, pH, Buffering Capacity, and Secretory Immunoglobulin A Levels between Children with Early Childhood Caries and Caries-free Children.患有幼儿龋齿的儿童与无龋齿儿童的唾液流速、pH值、缓冲能力及分泌型免疫球蛋白A水平的比较
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Mar;17(3):334-340. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2751.
7
A Comparative Quantitative Assessment of Salivary Iga and Alpha Amylase in Caries Free and Caries Active Children.龋病活跃儿童与无龋儿童唾液 IgA 和α-淀粉酶的比较定量评估。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021 Nov 1;45(5):323-329. doi: 10.17796/1053-4625-45.5.6.
8
The effect of photodynamic therapy on the salivary flow rate, IgA concentration and C-reactive protein levels in active smokers: a case-control study.光动力疗法对主动吸烟患者唾液流率、IgA 浓度和 C 反应蛋白水平的影响:一项病例对照研究。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023 Apr;27(7):2733-2738. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202304_31900.
9
Salivary flow rate, subjective oral dryness and dental caries 5 years after haematopoietic cell transplantation.造血细胞移植后 5 年的唾液流率、主观口腔干燥和龋齿。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Sep 10;24(1):1058. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04804-7.
10
Type 1 diabetes mellitus, xerostomia, and salivary flow rates.1型糖尿病、口干症与唾液流速
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001 Sep;92(3):281-91. doi: 10.1067/moe.2001.117815.

引用本文的文献

1
Association Between Tobacco and Periodontal Disease in Latin America from 2000 to 2024: Cross-Sectional Analysis of Global Burden of Disease Study.2000年至2024年拉丁美洲烟草与牙周病之间的关联:全球疾病负担研究的横断面分析
J Clin Med. 2025 May 19;14(10):3549. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103549.
2
The Impact of Electronic and Conventional Cigarette Use towards Saliva Profile and Oral Microbiota in Adolescents.电子香烟和传统香烟的使用对青少年唾液特征及口腔微生物群的影响
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2025 Jan 1;26(1):309-318. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2025.26.1.309.
3
Salivary Profile Analysis Based on Oral Cancer Risk Habits: An Observational Cross-Sectional Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of nicotine on human gingival, periodontal ligament and oral epithelial cells. A systematic review of the literature.尼古丁对人牙龈、牙周韧带和口腔上皮细胞的影响。文献系统综述。
J Dent. 2019 Jul;86:81-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.05.030. Epub 2019 May 25.
2
Comparison of Periodontal Inflammatory Parameters and Whole Salivary Cytokine Profile Among Saudi Patients with Different Obesity Levels.沙特不同肥胖水平患者牙周炎症参数与全唾液细胞因子谱的比较。
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018 Nov/Dec;38(6):e119-e126. doi: 10.11607/prd.3411.
3
Clinical oral dryness score: evaluation of a new screening method for oral dryness.
基于口腔癌风险习惯的唾液特征分析:一项观察性横断面研究。
Biomedicines. 2024 Aug 2;12(8):1748. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12081748.
4
Clinical characteristics and caries risk assessment of tobacco heating systems smokers, cigarette smokers and non-smokers: a cross-sectional study.吸烟系统使用者、吸烟者和非吸烟者的临床特征和龋齿风险评估:一项横断面研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Jun 18;28(7):382. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05778-0.
5
Oral health related quality of life and the prevalence of ageusia and xerostomia in active and recovered COVID-19 Patients.口腔健康相关生活质量以及活动期和恢复期 COVID-19 患者味觉丧失和口干的患病率。
PeerJ. 2023 Mar 6;11:e14860. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14860. eCollection 2023.
6
The prevalence of xerostomia among e-cigarette or combustible tobacco users: A systematic review and meta-analysis.电子烟或可燃烟草使用者中口干症的患病率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Tob Induc Dis. 2023 Feb 9;21:22. doi: 10.18332/tid/156676. eCollection 2023.
临床口腔干燥评分:一种口腔干燥新筛查方法的评估
Odontology. 2018 Oct;106(4):439-444. doi: 10.1007/s10266-018-0339-4. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
4
Effect of saliva collection methods and oral hygiene on salivary biomarkers.唾液采集方法和口腔卫生对唾液生物标志物的影响。
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2017 Oct;77(6):415-422. doi: 10.1080/00365513.2017.1334261. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
5
Effects of Tobacco on Salivary Antioxidative and Immunologic Systems.烟草对唾液抗氧化和免疫系统的影响。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017 May 1;18(5):1215-1218. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.5.1215.
6
Preliminary findings on the correlation of saliva pH, buffering capacity, flow rate and consistency in relation to waterpipe tobacco smoking.关于水烟吸食与唾液pH值、缓冲能力、流速和黏稠度之间相关性的初步研究结果。
Libyan J Med. 2017 Dec;12(1):1289651. doi: 10.1080/19932820.2017.1289651.
7
Impacts of cigarette smoking on immune responsiveness: Up and down or upside down?吸烟对免疫反应性的影响:是增强还是减弱,抑或是相反?
Oncotarget. 2017 Jan 3;8(1):268-284. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13613.
8
The Effect of Tobacco Smoking on Salivation.吸烟对唾液分泌的影响。
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2015 Dec;49(4):309-15. doi: 10.15644/asc49/4/6.
9
Relationship between salivary stress biomarker levels and cigarette smoking in healthy young adults: an exploratory analysis.健康年轻成年人唾液应激生物标志物水平与吸烟之间的关系:一项探索性分析。
Tob Induc Dis. 2016 Jun 6;14:20. doi: 10.1186/s12971-016-0085-8. eCollection 2016.
10
Long-term effect of tobacco on unstimulated salivary pH.烟草对非刺激性唾液pH值的长期影响。
J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2016 Jan-Apr;20(1):16-9. doi: 10.4103/0973-029X.180907.