• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

具有取代小麦品种抗性潜力的新型侵袭性叶锈病小种的出现。

The Emergence of New Aggressive Leaf Rust Races with the Potential to Supplant the Resistance of Wheat Cultivars.

作者信息

Omara Reda Ibrahim, Nehela Yasser, Mabrouk Ola Ibrahim, Elsharkawy Mohsen Mohamed

机构信息

Wheat Diseases Research Department, Plant Pathology Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Giza 12619, Egypt.

Department of Agricultural Botany, Faculty of Agriculture, Tanta University, Tanta 31511, Egypt.

出版信息

Biology (Basel). 2021 Sep 16;10(9):925. doi: 10.3390/biology10090925.

DOI:10.3390/biology10090925
PMID:34571802
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8471702/
Abstract

Characterization of the genetic structure and the physiological races of is a growing necessity to apply host genetic resistance against wheat leaf rust as a successful control strategy. Herein, we collected and identified about 130 isolates of from 16 Egyptian commercial wheat cultivars grown at different locations, over two seasons (2019/2020 and 2020/2021). The 130 isolates of were segregated into 17 different physiological races. TTTST and TTTKS were the most common virulent races, whereas TTTST and MTTGT were the most frequent races. The races were classified into three groups, based on their distinct DNA band sizes (150 bp, 200 bp, and 300 bp) after RAPD analysis. The new wheat cultivars (Sakha-94, Sakha-95, and Shandweel-1) infected with the most virulent race (TTTST), Gemmeiza-12, and Misr-3 were resistant to all physiological races. The resistance of these cultivars was mostly due to the presence of and resistant genes. Our results serve as a warning about emerging aggressive races capable of supplanting resistance to leaf rust, and help in the understanding of the pathotype-cultivar-location association and its role in the susceptibility/resistance of new wheat cultivars to

摘要

鉴定小麦叶锈菌的遗传结构和生理小种对于将寄主遗传抗性作为一种成功的防治策略来应用愈发必要。在此,我们在两个生长季(2019/2020和2020/2021)从埃及不同地点种植的16个商业小麦品种中收集并鉴定了约130个小麦叶锈菌分离株。这130个小麦叶锈菌分离株被分为17个不同的生理小种。TTTST和TTTKS是最常见的毒性小种,而TTTST和MTTGT是最频繁出现的小种。基于随机扩增多态性DNA(RAPD)分析后不同的DNA条带大小(150 bp、200 bp和300 bp),这些小种被分为三组。感染最具毒性小种(TTTST)的新小麦品种(Sakha - 94、Sakha - 95和Shandweel - 1)、Gemmeiza - 12和Misr - 3对所有生理小种均具有抗性。这些品种的抗性主要归因于Lr和抗性基因的存在。我们的结果警示了可能取代叶锈抗性的新兴侵袭性小种的出现,并有助于理解致病型 - 品种 - 地点关联及其在新小麦品种对叶锈易感性/抗性中的作用

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4aa3/8471702/0a028ef1ce10/biology-10-00925-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4aa3/8471702/a72d8c7260f3/biology-10-00925-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4aa3/8471702/2d6dbc5cc27d/biology-10-00925-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4aa3/8471702/112263b94deb/biology-10-00925-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4aa3/8471702/2c4e613c9d4c/biology-10-00925-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4aa3/8471702/cb682fe2a0bd/biology-10-00925-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4aa3/8471702/abad1abbbc02/biology-10-00925-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4aa3/8471702/71b7113a067b/biology-10-00925-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4aa3/8471702/190bdf348a1f/biology-10-00925-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4aa3/8471702/0a028ef1ce10/biology-10-00925-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4aa3/8471702/a72d8c7260f3/biology-10-00925-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4aa3/8471702/2d6dbc5cc27d/biology-10-00925-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4aa3/8471702/112263b94deb/biology-10-00925-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4aa3/8471702/2c4e613c9d4c/biology-10-00925-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4aa3/8471702/cb682fe2a0bd/biology-10-00925-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4aa3/8471702/abad1abbbc02/biology-10-00925-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4aa3/8471702/71b7113a067b/biology-10-00925-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4aa3/8471702/190bdf348a1f/biology-10-00925-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4aa3/8471702/0a028ef1ce10/biology-10-00925-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
The Emergence of New Aggressive Leaf Rust Races with the Potential to Supplant the Resistance of Wheat Cultivars.具有取代小麦品种抗性潜力的新型侵袭性叶锈病小种的出现。
Biology (Basel). 2021 Sep 16;10(9):925. doi: 10.3390/biology10090925.
2
How to Differentiate between Resistant and Susceptible Wheat Cultivars for Leaf Rust Fungi Using Antioxidant Enzymes and Histological and Molecular Studies?如何使用抗氧化酶和组织学及分子研究区分小麦叶锈病的抗性和感病品种?
Cells. 2023 Nov 17;12(22):2643. doi: 10.3390/cells12222643.
3
Evaluation of Wheat Germplasm for Resistance to Leaf Rust () and Identification of the Sources of Resistance Genes Using Molecular Markers.小麦种质对叶锈病抗性的评价及利用分子标记鉴定抗性基因来源
Plants (Basel). 2021 Jul 20;10(7):1484. doi: 10.3390/plants10071484.
4
Virulence Polymorphism of Puccinia recondita f. sp. tritici and Effectiveness of Lr Genes for Leaf Rust Resistance of Wheat in Ukraine.乌克兰小麦叶锈病菌隐匿柄锈菌小麦专化型的毒力多态性及抗叶锈病Lr基因的有效性
Plant Dis. 2006 Jul;90(7):853-857. doi: 10.1094/PD-90-0853.
5
Phenotyping and Identification of Molecular Markers Associated with Leaf Rust Resistance in the Wheat Germplasm from Kazakhstan, CIMMYT and ICARDA.哈萨克斯坦、国际玉米小麦改良中心(CIMMYT)和国际干旱地区农业研究中心(ICARDA)小麦种质中与抗叶锈相关的分子标记的表型分析与鉴定
Plants (Basel). 2023 Jul 27;12(15):2786. doi: 10.3390/plants12152786.
6
Genome-Wide Association Study of a Worldwide Collection of Wheat Genotypes Reveals Novel Quantitative Trait Loci for Leaf Rust Resistance.基于全球小麦基因型的全基因组关联研究揭示了叶锈病抗性的新数量性状基因座。
Plant Genome. 2019 Nov;12(3):1-14. doi: 10.3835/plantgenome2019.05.0033.
7
Lr19 Resistance in Wheat Becomes Susceptible to Puccinia triticina in India.小麦中的Lr19抗性在印度对小麦叶锈菌变得易感。
Plant Dis. 2005 Dec;89(12):1360. doi: 10.1094/PD-89-1360A.
8
Race and Virulence Analysis of in China During 2011 to 2013.2011 年至 2013 年中国产毒株的种族和毒力分析。
Plant Dis. 2020 Aug;104(8):2095-2101. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-01-20-0047-RE. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
9
Mining of Leaf Rust Resistance Genes Content in Egyptian Bread Wheat Collection.挖掘埃及面包小麦种质中抗叶锈病基因的含量
Plants (Basel). 2021 Jul 5;10(7):1378. doi: 10.3390/plants10071378.
10
Evaluation of the resistance to Chinese predominant races of and analysis of effective leaf rust resistance genes in wheat accessions from the U.S. National Plant Germplasm System.美国国家植物种质系统小麦种质对中国主要小种的抗性评价及有效抗叶锈病基因分析
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Oct 26;13:1054673. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1054673. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid (GABA) as a Defense Booster for Wheat against Leaf Rust Pathogen ().γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)作为小麦抵御叶锈病菌的防御增强剂()。
Plants (Basel). 2024 Oct 5;13(19):2792. doi: 10.3390/plants13192792.
2
Mapping and characterization of rust resistance genes Lr53 and Yr35 introgressed from Aegilops species.定位和鉴定来自 Aegilops 物种的抗锈病基因 Lr53 和 Yr35。
Theor Appl Genet. 2024 Apr 28;137(5):113. doi: 10.1007/s00122-024-04616-x.
3
Genome-wide association analyses of leaf rust resistance in cultivated emmer wheat.

本文引用的文献

1
Editorial: Fungal Wheat Diseases: Etiology, Breeding, and Integrated Management.社论:小麦真菌病害:病因、育种与综合管理
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Mar 30;12:671060. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.671060. eCollection 2021.
2
Genome-wide association study of leaf rust resistance in Russian spring wheat varieties.俄罗斯春小麦品种叶锈病抗性的全基因组关联研究。
BMC Plant Biol. 2020 Oct 14;20(Suppl 1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-02333-3.
3
Virulence of Leaf Rust Physiological Races in Iran From 2010 to 2017.2010 年至 2017 年伊朗叶锈菌生理小种的毒力。
全基因组关联分析栽培二粒小麦叶锈病抗性。
Theor Appl Genet. 2023 Jan;136(1):20. doi: 10.1007/s00122-023-04281-6. Epub 2023 Jan 22.
4
Genome-Wide Screening of Broad-Spectrum Resistance to Leaf Rust ( Eriks) in Spring Wheat ( L.).春小麦(L.)对叶锈病(Eriks)广谱抗性的全基因组筛选
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Jun 22;13:921230. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.921230. eCollection 2022.
5
Mechanism of Wheat Leaf Rust Control Using Chitosan Nanoparticles and Salicylic Acid.壳聚糖纳米颗粒与水杨酸防治小麦叶锈病的机制
J Fungi (Basel). 2022 Mar 16;8(3):304. doi: 10.3390/jof8030304.
6
Identification of Quantitative Trait Loci for Leaf Rust and Stem Rust Seedling Resistance in Bread Wheat Using a Genome-Wide Association Study.利用全基因组关联研究鉴定面包小麦叶锈病和秆锈病幼苗抗性的数量性状位点
Plants (Basel). 2021 Dec 27;11(1):74. doi: 10.3390/plants11010074.
7
Durability of Adult Plant Resistance Gene in Partial Resistance Behavior of Wheat () Genotypes with Different Degrees of Tolerance to Stripe Rust Disease, Caused by f. sp. : A Five-Year Study.小麦()不同耐条锈病程度基因型对条锈菌(Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici)部分抗性行为中成年植株抗性基因的持久性:一项为期五年的研究
Plants (Basel). 2021 Oct 22;10(11):2262. doi: 10.3390/plants10112262.
Plant Dis. 2020 Feb;104(2):363-372. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-06-19-1340-RE. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
4
Physiologic Specialization of Puccinia triticina in Canada in 1998.1998年加拿大小麦叶锈菌的生理专化性
Plant Dis. 2001 Feb;85(2):155-158. doi: 10.1094/PDIS.2001.85.2.155.
5
Patterns of Virulence Diversity in Puccinia triticina on Wheat in Egypt and the United States in 1998-2000.1998 - 2000年埃及和美国小麦上小麦叶锈菌的毒力多样性模式
Plant Dis. 2004 Mar;88(3):271-279. doi: 10.1094/PDIS.2004.88.3.271.
6
Physiologic Specialization of Puccinia triticina on Wheat in the United States in 2003.2003年美国小麦叶锈病菌对小麦的生理专化性
Plant Dis. 2005 Nov;89(11):1201-1206. doi: 10.1094/PD-89-1201.
7
Physiologic Specialization of Puccinia triticina on Wheat in the United States in 2009.2009年美国小麦叶锈菌对小麦的生理专化性
Plant Dis. 2011 Aug;95(8):935-940. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-11-10-0786.
8
The global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops.主要粮食作物的病原体和害虫的全球负担。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2019 Mar;3(3):430-439. doi: 10.1038/s41559-018-0793-y. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
9
Characterization of Lr75: a partial, broad-spectrum leaf rust resistance gene in wheat.Lr75的特性:小麦中一个具有部分抗性和广谱抗叶锈病的基因
Theor Appl Genet. 2017 Jan;130(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s00122-016-2784-1. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
10
Validation and identification of molecular markers linked to the leaf rust resistance gene Lr28 in wheat.小麦抗叶锈病基因 Lr28 连锁分子标记的验证与鉴定。
J Appl Genet. 2011 May;52(2):171-5. doi: 10.1007/s13353-010-0026-9. Epub 2011 Jan 12.