Payne Ariane, Ogweng Peter, Ståhl Karl, Masembe Charles, Jori Ferran
Department of Zoology, Entomology and Fisheries Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
National Veterinary Institute, SVA, Uppsala, Sweden.
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Sep 23;8:689377. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.689377. eCollection 2021.
In many Ugandan rural communities, pigs are generally kept under traditional smallholder systems without basic biosecurity measures in place. In some instances, these systems are at the livestock-wildlife interface, as it is the case in Nwoya district, which is bordered by Murchison Falls National Park (MFNP). This pig system has potential for the maintenance and transmission of pathogens like African swine fever (ASF) between different herds, and also with wild pigs (warthogs and bushpigs). In this paper, we describe the spatial and temporal pattern of the movements of free ranging domestic pigs in a rural setting in Northern Uganda where ASF is endemic. We also determine their use of habitat to highlight the potential interaction hotspots between domestic pigs and between domestic and wild pig populations. We fitted 10 free-ranging domestic pigs owned by different homesteads with GPS harnesses during rainy and dry seasons. The pig home range, daily distance, activity pattern and habitat use were calculated. Our results show that the maximum area covered (MCP 100%) by the pigs varied between 35,965 and 475,077 m. The core area varied from 1,317 to 50,769 m. The pigs' home ranges were significantly bigger during the dry season than during the rainy season (Wilcoxon test, = 22, = 0.04). The mean full day (24 h) distance was longer in the dry season than in the rainy season (Student test, = 2.7, = 0.03). The pigs were mostly located within their own homestead, but they also used other homesteads, grass and crop fields. This study highlights that free-ranging domestic pigs may cover a wide area, especially during the dry season. Interestingly, the home range of pigs from different herds may overlap with areas used by wild pigs which share crops and other resources in this area. This study provides insights into a better understanding of the potential for spread of diseases such as ASF at small-scale and can be used to raise awareness of such risks and to better target implementation of preventive measures.
在许多乌干达农村社区,猪一般采用传统的小农户养殖方式,没有基本的生物安全措施。在某些情况下,这些养殖系统处于家畜与野生动物的交界地带,比如在与默奇森瀑布国家公园(MFNP)接壤的恩沃亚区就是如此。这种养猪方式有可能在不同猪群之间,以及与野猪(疣猪和非洲野猪)之间维持和传播非洲猪瘟(ASF)等病原体。在本文中,我们描述了乌干达北部一个ASF地方病流行的农村地区自由放养的家猪的空间和时间移动模式。我们还确定了它们对栖息地的利用情况,以突出家猪之间以及家猪与野猪种群之间潜在的相互作用热点。在雨季和旱季,我们给不同家庭饲养的10头自由放养的家猪佩戴了GPS追踪器。计算了猪的活动范围、每日移动距离、活动模式和栖息地利用情况。我们的结果表明,猪覆盖的最大面积(MCP 100%)在35965平方米至475077平方米之间。核心区域在1317平方米至50769平方米之间。猪的活动范围在旱季明显大于雨季(Wilcoxon检验,Z = 22,P = 0.04)。平均全天(24小时)移动距离在旱季比雨季更长(Student检验,t = 2.7,P = 0.03)。猪大多位于自家的宅基地内,但它们也会使用其他宅基地、草地和农田。这项研究突出表明,自由放养的家猪可能会覆盖很大的区域,尤其是在旱季。有趣的是,不同猪群的家猪活动范围可能与该地区野猪使用的区域重叠,这些野猪会共享作物和其他资源。这项研究有助于更好地理解小规模传播ASF等疾病的可能性,并可用于提高对这类风险的认识,以及更有针对性地实施预防措施。