在非临床样本中比较SPEED问卷和OSDI问卷。
Comparing SPEED and OSDI Questionnaires in a Non-Clinical Sample.
作者信息
Hashmani Nauman, Munaf Uzair, Saleem Aqsa, Javed Syed Owais, Hashmani Sharif
机构信息
Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Hashmanis Hospital, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
Civil Hospital, Dow Medical College, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
出版信息
Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Oct 19;15:4169-4173. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S332565. eCollection 2021.
PURPOSE
To compare the performance of OSDI and SPEED questionnaires in a non-clinical sample in Pakistan.
METHODS
SPEED and OSDI questionnaires were simultaneously administered to a sample of 600 participants in Pakistan with an average age of 31.0 ± 10.1 years.
RESULTS
Mean SPEED scores were calculated according to the OSDI categories and were found to be 3.33 ± 3.44, 5.45 ± 3.77, 7.86 ± 4.33, and 9.39 ± 4.56 for the normal, mild, moderate, and severe groups, respectively. Using Cronbach's alpha, the total OSDI and SPEED scores were calculated to be 0.924 and 0.879, respectively. A receiver operating curve was plotted, and the area under the curve (AUC) was estimated to be 0.791. Using this curve, the cutoff score for the SPEED questionnaire was found to be 4.00 (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
The SPEED questionnaire can be used as an effective alternative to the OSDI.
目的
比较巴基斯坦非临床样本中OSDI问卷和SPEED问卷的性能。
方法
对巴基斯坦600名平均年龄为31.0±10.1岁的参与者样本同时发放SPEED问卷和OSDI问卷。
结果
根据OSDI类别计算出SPEED平均得分，正常、轻度、中度和重度组的得分分别为3.33±3.44、5.45±3.77、7.86±4.33和9.39±4.56。使用克朗巴哈系数，计算出OSDI和SPEED总得分分别为0.924和0.879。绘制了受试者工作特征曲线，曲线下面积（AUC）估计为0.791。利用该曲线，发现SPEED问卷的临界值为4.00（P<0.001）。
结论
SPEED问卷可作为OSDI问卷的有效替代工具。
Zotero 插件