Suppr超能文献

进行相关性分析:重要的局限性和陷阱。

Conducting correlation analysis: important limitations and pitfalls.

作者信息

Janse Roemer J, Hoekstra Tiny, Jager Kitty J, Zoccali Carmine, Tripepi Giovanni, Dekker Friedo W, van Diepen Merel

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Department of Nephrology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Clin Kidney J. 2021 May 3;14(11):2332-2337. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfab085. eCollection 2021 Nov.

Abstract

The correlation coefficient is a statistical measure often used in studies to show an association between variables or to look at the agreement between two methods. In this paper, we will discuss not only the basics of the correlation coefficient, such as its assumptions and how it is interpreted, but also important limitations when using the correlation coefficient, such as its assumption of a linear association and its sensitivity to the range of observations. We will also discuss why the coefficient is invalid when used to assess agreement of two methods aiming to measure a certain value, and discuss better alternatives, such as the intraclass coefficient and Bland-Altman's limits of agreement. The concepts discussed in this paper are supported with examples from literature in the field of nephrology.

摘要

相关系数是一种统计量度,常用于研究中以显示变量之间的关联或考察两种方法之间的一致性。在本文中,我们不仅将讨论相关系数的基础知识,如它的假设以及如何解读,还将讨论使用相关系数时的重要局限性,如它对线性关联的假设以及对观测范围的敏感性。我们还将讨论为什么在用于评估旨在测量某个值的两种方法的一致性时该系数是无效的,并讨论更好的替代方法,如实内系数和布兰德-奥特曼一致性界限。本文所讨论的概念通过肾脏病领域文献中的实例加以支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ace8/8572982/463b6cc92c19/sfab085f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验