Department of Diagnostic Medicine, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.
Livestrong Cancer Institutes, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Breast Cancer Res. 2021 Nov 27;23(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s13058-021-01489-6.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether advanced quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be deployed outside of large, research-oriented academic hospitals and into community care settings to predict eventual pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in patients with locally advanced breast cancer.
Patients with stage II/III breast cancer (N = 28) were enrolled in a multicenter study performed in community radiology settings. Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) and diffusion-weighted (DW)-MRI data were acquired at four time points during the course of NAT. Estimates of the vascular perfusion and permeability, as assessed by the volume transfer rate (K) using the Patlak model, were generated from the DCE-MRI data while estimates of cell density, as assessed by the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), were calculated from DW-MRI data. Tumor volume was calculated using semi-automatic segmentation and combined with K and ADC to yield bulk tumor blood flow and cellularity, respectively. The percent change in quantitative parameters at each MRI scan was calculated and compared to pathological response at the time of surgery. The predictive accuracy of each MRI parameter at different time points was quantified using receiver operating characteristic curves.
Tumor size and quantitative MRI parameters were similar at baseline between groups that achieved pCR (n = 8) and those that did not (n = 20). Patients achieving a pCR had a larger decline in volume and cellularity than those who did not achieve pCR after one cycle of NAT (p < 0.05). At the third and fourth MRI, changes in tumor volume, K, ADC, cellularity, and bulk tumor flow from baseline (pre-treatment) were all significantly greater (p < 0.05) in the cohort who achieved pCR compared to those patients with non-pCR.
Quantitative analysis of DCE-MRI and DW-MRI can be implemented in the community care setting to accurately predict the response of breast cancer to NAT. Dissemination of quantitative MRI into the community setting allows for the incorporation of these parameters into the standard of care and increases the number of clinical community sites able to participate in novel drug trials that require quantitative MRI.
本研究旨在确定先进的定量磁共振成像(MRI)是否可在大型研究型学术医院之外应用于社区护理环境,以预测局部晚期乳腺癌患者接受新辅助治疗(NAT)后最终的病理完全缓解(pCR)。
本研究纳入了 28 例 II/III 期乳腺癌患者,这些患者来自在社区放射科进行的多中心研究。在 NAT 过程中,采集了四个时间点的动态对比增强(DCE)和弥散加权(DW)MRI 数据。通过 Patlak 模型从 DCE-MRI 数据中计算血管灌注和通透性的容积转移率(K),并从 DW-MRI 数据中计算细胞密度的表观扩散系数(ADC)。使用半自动分割技术计算肿瘤体积,并将其与 K 和 ADC 结合,分别得到肿瘤的总体血流和细胞密度。计算每个 MRI 扫描的定量参数的百分比变化,并与手术时的病理反应进行比较。使用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)量化每个 MRI 参数在不同时间点的预测准确性。
在达到 pCR(n=8)和未达到 pCR(n=20)的两组患者中,基线时肿瘤大小和定量 MRI 参数相似。与未达到 pCR 的患者相比,达到 pCR 的患者在接受一个周期的 NAT 后,肿瘤体积和细胞密度的下降幅度更大(p<0.05)。在第三和第四次 MRI 时,与未达到 pCR 的患者相比,达到 pCR 的患者的肿瘤体积、K、ADC、细胞密度和总体血流的基线(治疗前)变化显著更大(p<0.05)。
在社区护理环境中实施 DCE-MRI 和 DW-MRI 的定量分析可以准确预测乳腺癌对 NAT 的反应。将定量 MRI 推广到社区环境中,可以将这些参数纳入常规护理,并增加能够参与需要定量 MRI 的新型药物试验的临床社区站点数量。