• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与非保护区相比,东南亚保护区在保护森林覆盖和森林碳储量方面非常有效。

Southeast Asian protected areas are effective in conserving forest cover and forest carbon stocks compared to unprotected areas.

机构信息

Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 9;11(1):23760. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03188-w.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-03188-w
PMID:34887488
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8660836/
Abstract

Protected areas aim to conserve nature, ecosystem services, and cultural values; however, they have variable success in doing so under high development pressure. Southeast Asian protected areas faced the highest level of human pressure at the turn of the twenty-first century. To estimate their effectiveness in conserving forest cover and forest carbon stocks for 2000-2018, we used statistical matching methods to control for the non-random location of protected areas, to compare protection against a matched counterfactual. We found Southeast Asian protected areas had three times less forest cover loss than similar landscapes without protection. Protected areas that had completed management reporting using the Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool (METT) conserved significantly more forest cover and forest carbon stocks than those that had not. Management scores were positively associated with the level of carbon emissions avoided, but not the level of forest cover loss avoided. Our study is the first to find that METT scores could predict the level of carbon emissions avoided in protected areas. Given that only 11% of protected areas in Southeast Asia had completed METT surveys, our results illustrate the need to scale-up protected area management effectiveness reporting programs to improve their effectiveness for conserving forests, and for storing and sequestering carbon.

摘要

保护区旨在保护自然、生态系统服务和文化价值;然而,在面临高度发展压力的情况下,它们的保护效果存在差异。21 世纪之交,东南亚保护区面临着人类压力的最高水平。为了评估其在保护 2000-2018 年森林覆盖和森林碳储量方面的有效性,我们使用统计匹配方法来控制保护区的非随机位置,以保护区与匹配的反事实进行比较。我们发现,与没有保护的相似景观相比,东南亚保护区的森林覆盖损失减少了三分之二。使用管理效果跟踪工具(METT)完成管理报告的保护区比未完成报告的保护区保护了更多的森林覆盖和森林碳储量。管理得分与避免的碳排放量水平呈正相关,但与避免的森林覆盖损失水平无关。我们的研究首次发现,METT 得分可以预测保护区避免的碳排放量水平。鉴于东南亚只有 11%的保护区完成了 METT 调查,我们的结果表明需要扩大保护区管理效果报告计划,以提高其保护森林、储存和封存碳的效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad78/8660836/74dd47290c19/41598_2021_3188_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad78/8660836/437d3072f012/41598_2021_3188_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad78/8660836/fd0e1f072db4/41598_2021_3188_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad78/8660836/79b2786dab45/41598_2021_3188_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad78/8660836/3731f992b75b/41598_2021_3188_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad78/8660836/ca7a0d931ca2/41598_2021_3188_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad78/8660836/74dd47290c19/41598_2021_3188_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad78/8660836/437d3072f012/41598_2021_3188_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad78/8660836/fd0e1f072db4/41598_2021_3188_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad78/8660836/79b2786dab45/41598_2021_3188_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad78/8660836/3731f992b75b/41598_2021_3188_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad78/8660836/ca7a0d931ca2/41598_2021_3188_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad78/8660836/74dd47290c19/41598_2021_3188_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Southeast Asian protected areas are effective in conserving forest cover and forest carbon stocks compared to unprotected areas.与非保护区相比,东南亚保护区在保护森林覆盖和森林碳储量方面非常有效。
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 9;11(1):23760. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03188-w.
2
Carbon benefits from protected areas in the conterminous United States.美国本土的保护区为碳带来益处。
Carbon Balance Manag. 2013 Apr 17;8(1):4. doi: 10.1186/1750-0680-8-4.
3
Quantifying carbon stocks in shifting cultivation landscapes under divergent management scenarios relevant to REDD.量化与 REDD 相关的不同管理情景下轮垦景观中的碳储量。
Ecol Appl. 2018 Sep;28(6):1581-1593. doi: 10.1002/eap.1764. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
4
Linking management effectiveness indicators to observed effects of protected areas on fire occurrence in the Amazon rainforest.将管理有效性指标与保护区对亚马逊热带雨林火灾发生的观测效应联系起来。
Conserv Biol. 2013 Feb;27(1):155-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01930.x. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
5
Effectiveness of protected areas in reducing deforestation and forest fragmentation in Bangladesh.保护区在减少孟加拉国森林砍伐和森林破碎化方面的有效性。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Feb 15;280:111711. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111711. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
6
Forest Loss in Protected Areas and Intact Forest Landscapes: A Global Analysis.保护区和完整森林景观中的森林丧失:一项全球分析。
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 14;10(10):e0138918. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138918. eCollection 2015.
7
Protected areas: mixed success in conserving East Africa's evergreen forests.保护区:东非常绿森林保护喜忧参半。
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039337. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
8
Integrating carbon stocks and landscape connectivity for nature-based climate solutions.将碳储量与景观连通性相结合,以实现基于自然的气候解决方案。
Ecol Evol. 2023 Jan 9;13(1):e9725. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9725. eCollection 2023 Jan.
9
A spatially explicit estimate of avoided forest loss.避免森林损失的空间明确估计。
Conserv Biol. 2011 Oct;25(5):1032-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01729.x.
10
Effects of land use, cover, and protection on stream and riparian ecosystem services and biodiversity.土地利用、覆盖和保护对溪流和河岸生态系统服务及生物多样性的影响。
Conserv Biol. 2020 Feb;34(1):244-255. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13348. Epub 2019 Jul 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Research on Forest Carbon Sequestration and Its Economic Valuation: A Case Study of the Zixi Mountain Nature Reserve, Chuxiong Prefecture.森林碳汇及其经济价值研究:以楚雄州紫溪山自然保护区为例
Plants (Basel). 2025 Sep 2;14(17):2746. doi: 10.3390/plants14172746.
2
Navigating data challenges in socioeconomic impact assessments of conservation regimes.应对保护制度社会经济影响评估中的数据挑战。
Conserv Biol. 2025 Apr;39(2):e14457. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14457.
3
Effect of reserve protection level and governance on tree cover loss and gain.

本文引用的文献

1
Early warning sign of forest loss in protected areas.保护区森林损失的早期预警信号。
Curr Biol. 2021 Oct 25;31(20):4620-4626.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.07.072. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
2
Anthropogenic modification of forests means only 40% of remaining forests have high ecosystem integrity.人为改变森林意味着只有 40%的剩余森林具有较高的生态完整性。
Nat Commun. 2020 Dec 8;11(1):5978. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19493-3.
3
Effects of spatial autocorrelation and sampling design on estimates of protected area effectiveness.空间自相关和采样设计对保护区有效性估计的影响。
保护区保护水平和管理对树木覆盖面积增减的影响。
Conserv Biol. 2025 Aug;39(4):e14449. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14449. Epub 2025 Jan 24.
4
The role of funding in the performance of Latin America's protected areas.资金在拉丁美洲保护区绩效中的作用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Sep 3;121(36):e2307521121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2307521121. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
5
Quantifying the availability of seasonal surface water and identifying the drivers of change within tropical forests in Cambodia.量化柬埔寨热带森林季节性地表水的可得性,并确定变化的驱动因素。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 29;19(7):e0307964. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307964. eCollection 2024.
6
Spider fauna (Arachnida, Araneae) in Mordovia State Nature Reserve and National Park "Smolny" (Russia).莫尔多维亚州自然保护区和“斯莫尔尼”国家公园(俄罗斯)的蜘蛛区系(蛛形纲,蜘蛛目)
Biodivers Data J. 2023 Oct 20;11:e105979. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.11.e105979. eCollection 2023.
7
Landscape-scale benefits of protected areas for tropical biodiversity.保护区对热带生物多样性的景观尺度效益。
Nature. 2023 Aug;620(7975):807-812. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06410-z. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
8
The effectiveness of global protected areas for climate change mitigation.全球保护区在缓解气候变化方面的有效性。
Nat Commun. 2023 Jun 1;14(1):2908. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-38073-9.
9
Carbonated tiger-high above-ground biomass carbon stock in protected areas and corridors and its observed negative relationship with tiger population density and occupancy in the Terai Arc Landscape, Nepal.尼泊尔特莱低地景观保护区和廊道中碳酸化的老虎上层生物量碳储量及其与老虎种群密度和栖息地占有率的观测负相关关系。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 25;18(1):e0280824. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280824. eCollection 2023.
10
High deforestation trajectories in Cambodia slowly transformed through economic land concession restrictions and strategic execution of REDD+ protected areas.柬埔寨经历了高速的森林砍伐,这一趋势随着经济林地特许限制以及 REDD+ 保护区的战略实施而逐渐转变。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 14;12(1):17102. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19660-0.
Conserv Biol. 2020 Dec;34(6):1452-1462. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13522. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
4
The role of forest conversion, degradation, and disturbance in the carbon dynamics of Amazon indigenous territories and protected areas.森林转换、退化和干扰在亚马逊土著领土和保护区碳动态中的作用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Feb 11;117(6):3015-3025. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1913321117. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
5
Statistical matching for conservation science.统计匹配在保护科学中的应用。
Conserv Biol. 2020 Jun;34(3):538-549. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13448. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
6
A global-level assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas at resisting anthropogenic pressures.保护区抵御人为压力有效性的全球评估。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Nov 12;116(46):23209-23215. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1908221116. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
7
The future of Southeast Asia's forests.东南亚森林的未来。
Nat Commun. 2019 Apr 23;10(1):1829. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09646-4.
8
Classifying drivers of global forest loss.全球森林损失的驱动因素分类。
Science. 2018 Sep 14;361(6407):1108-1111. doi: 10.1126/science.aau3445.
9
Natural climate solutions.自然气候解决方案。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Oct 31;114(44):11645-11650. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1710465114. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
10
Tropical protected areas reduced deforestation carbon emissions by one third from 2000-2012.热带保护区减少了 2000-2012 年三分之一的森林砍伐碳排放量。
Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 25;7(1):14005. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14467-w.