• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

按顺序校准贝叶斯微模拟模型,以纳入新信息和假设。

Sequentially calibrating a Bayesian microsimulation model to incorporate new information and assumptions.

机构信息

RAND Corporation, 1776 Main St., Santa Monica, CA, 90401, USA.

Argonne National Laboratory, Building 221, 9700 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, IL, 60439, USA.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Jan 12;22(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01726-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-021-01726-0
PMID:35022005
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8756687/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Microsimulation models are mathematical models that simulate event histories for individual members of a population. They are useful for policy decisions because they simulate a large number of individuals from an idealized population, with features that change over time, and the resulting event histories can be summarized to describe key population-level outcomes. Model calibration is the process of incorporating evidence into the model. Calibrated models can be used to make predictions about population trends in disease outcomes and effectiveness of interventions, but calibration can be challenging and computationally expensive.

METHODS

This paper develops a technique for sequentially updating models to take full advantage of earlier calibration results, to ultimately speed up the calibration process. A Bayesian approach to calibration is used because it combines different sources of evidence and enables uncertainty quantification which is appealing for decision-making. We develop this method in order to re-calibrate a microsimulation model for the natural history of colorectal cancer to include new targets that better inform the time from initiation of preclinical cancer to presentation with clinical cancer (sojourn time), because model exploration and validation revealed that more information was needed on sojourn time, and that the predicted percentage of patients with cancers detected via colonoscopy screening was too low.

RESULTS

The sequential approach to calibration was more efficient than recalibrating the model from scratch. Incorporating new information on the percentage of patients with cancers detected upon screening changed the estimated sojourn time parameters significantly, increasing the estimated mean sojourn time for cancers in the colon and rectum, providing results with more validity.

CONCLUSIONS

A sequential approach to recalibration can be used to efficiently recalibrate a microsimulation model when new information becomes available that requires the original targets to be supplemented with additional targets.

摘要

背景

微模拟模型是一种对人群中个体的事件历史进行模拟的数学模型。它们对于政策决策很有用,因为它们可以从理想化的人群中模拟大量个体,这些个体具有随时间变化的特征,并且可以总结得到的事件历史来描述关键的人群水平结果。模型校准是将证据纳入模型的过程。校准后的模型可用于对疾病结果和干预措施效果的人群趋势进行预测,但校准可能具有挑战性且计算成本高。

方法

本文开发了一种技术,用于顺序更新模型,以充分利用早期的校准结果,最终加快校准过程。使用贝叶斯校准方法,因为它结合了不同的证据来源,并能够进行不确定性量化,这对于决策制定很有吸引力。我们开发这种方法是为了重新校准用于结直肠癌自然史的微模拟模型,以纳入更好地告知从临床前癌症开始到出现临床癌症(停留时间)的新目标,因为模型探索和验证表明需要更多关于停留时间的信息,并且预测通过结肠镜筛查检测到的癌症患者的百分比太低。

结果

校准的顺序方法比从头开始重新校准模型更有效。纳入有关通过筛查检测到的癌症患者百分比的新信息显著改变了估计的停留时间参数,增加了结肠和直肠癌症的估计平均停留时间,提供了更有效的结果。

结论

当有新信息需要用其他目标补充原始目标时,可以使用顺序重新校准方法来有效地重新校准微模拟模型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99a4/8756687/0e38351d657d/12911_2021_1726_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99a4/8756687/2626058afa79/12911_2021_1726_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99a4/8756687/1dca856ee7a0/12911_2021_1726_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99a4/8756687/0e38351d657d/12911_2021_1726_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99a4/8756687/2626058afa79/12911_2021_1726_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99a4/8756687/1dca856ee7a0/12911_2021_1726_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99a4/8756687/0e38351d657d/12911_2021_1726_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Sequentially calibrating a Bayesian microsimulation model to incorporate new information and assumptions.按顺序校准贝叶斯微模拟模型,以纳入新信息和假设。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Jan 12;22(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01726-0.
2
Bayesian Calibration of Microsimulation Models.微观模拟模型的贝叶斯校准
J Am Stat Assoc. 2009 Dec 1;104(488):1338-1350. doi: 10.1198/jasa.2009.ap07466.
3
Calibration and Validation of the Colorectal Cancer and Adenoma Incidence and Mortality (CRC-AIM) Microsimulation Model Using Deep Neural Networks.基于深度神经网络的结直肠癌与腺瘤发病和死亡(CRC-AIM)微观模拟模型的校准和验证。
Med Decis Making. 2023 Aug;43(6):719-736. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231184175. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
4
Emulator-Based Bayesian Calibration of the CISNET Colorectal Cancer Models.基于仿真器的 CISNET 结直肠癌模型的贝叶斯校准。
Med Decis Making. 2024 Jul;44(5):543-553. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241255618. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
5
Microsimulation Model Calibration with Approximate Bayesian Computation in R: A Tutorial.使用 R 中的近似贝叶斯计算进行微观模拟模型校准:教程。
Med Decis Making. 2022 Jul;42(5):557-570. doi: 10.1177/0272989X221085569. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
6
Bayesian versus Empirical Calibration of Microsimulation Models: A Comparative Analysis.贝叶斯与经验校准在微观模拟模型中的比较分析。
Med Decis Making. 2021 Aug;41(6):714-726. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211009161. Epub 2021 May 8.
7
Validation of Models Used to Inform Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines: Accuracy and Implications.用于指导结直肠癌筛查指南的模型验证:准确性及影响
Med Decis Making. 2016 Jul;36(5):604-14. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15622642. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
8
Bayesian Methods for Calibrating Health Policy Models: A Tutorial.校准健康政策模型的贝叶斯方法:教程
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Jun;35(6):613-624. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0494-4.
9
An evidence-based microsimulation model for colorectal cancer: validation and application.基于证据的结直肠癌微观模拟模型:验证与应用。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Aug;19(8):1992-2002. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0954. Epub 2010 Jul 20.
10
Dynamic calibration with approximate Bayesian computation for a microsimulation of disease spread.基于近似贝叶斯计算的疾病传播微模拟动态校准
Sci Rep. 2023 May 27;13(1):8637. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35580-z.

引用本文的文献

1
A Scoping Review on Calibration Methods for Cancer Simulation Models.癌症模拟模型校准方法的范围综述
Med Decis Making. 2025 Aug 11:272989X251353211. doi: 10.1177/0272989X251353211.
2
Stress-Testing US Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines: Decennial Colonoscopy from Age 45 is Robust to Natural History Uncertainty and Colonoscopy Sensitivity Assumptions.对美国结直肠癌筛查指南进行压力测试:从45岁开始每十年进行一次结肠镜检查对自然病史的不确定性和结肠镜检查敏感性假设具有稳健性。
Med Decis Making. 2025 Jul;45(5):557-568. doi: 10.1177/0272989X251334373. Epub 2025 Apr 29.
3
Calibration and Validation of the Colorectal Cancer and Adenoma Incidence and Mortality (CRC-AIM) Microsimulation Model Using Deep Neural Networks.

本文引用的文献

1
MICROSIMULATION MODEL CALIBRATION USING INCREMENTAL MIXTURE APPROXIMATE BAYESIAN COMPUTATION.使用增量混合近似贝叶斯计算的微观模拟模型校准
Ann Appl Stat. 2019 Dec;13(4):2189-2212. doi: 10.1214/19-aoas1279. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
2
FROM DESKTOP TO LARGE-SCALE MODEL EXPLORATION WITH SWIFT/T.借助SWIFT/T从桌面探索到大规模模型探索
Proc Winter Simul Conf. 2016 Dec;2016:206-220. doi: 10.1109/WSC.2016.7822090. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
3
Measuring Distribution Similarities Between Samples: A Distribution-Free Overlapping Index.测量样本间的分布相似性:一种无分布重叠指数。
基于深度神经网络的结直肠癌与腺瘤发病和死亡(CRC-AIM)微观模拟模型的校准和验证。
Med Decis Making. 2023 Aug;43(6):719-736. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231184175. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
4
Modeling the Natural History and Screening Effects of Colorectal Cancer Using Both Adenoma and Serrated Neoplasia Pathways: The Development, Calibration, and Validation of a Discrete Event Simulation Model.利用腺瘤和锯齿状肿瘤形成途径对结直肠癌的自然史和筛查效果进行建模:一个离散事件模拟模型的开发、校准与验证
MDM Policy Pract. 2023 Jan 19;8(1):23814683221145701. doi: 10.1177/23814683221145701. eCollection 2023 Jan-Jun.
5
Characterization and Valuation of the Uncertainty of Calibrated Parameters in Microsimulation Decision Models.微观模拟决策模型中校准参数不确定性的表征与评估
Front Physiol. 2022 May 9;13:780917. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.780917. eCollection 2022.
Front Psychol. 2019 May 21;10:1089. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01089. eCollection 2019.
4
Magnitude, Risk Factors, and Factors Associated With Adenoma Miss Rate of Tandem Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.结肠镜检查中腺瘤漏诊率的大小、危险因素及相关因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gastroenterology. 2019 May;156(6):1661-1674.e11. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.260. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
5
Bayesian Methods for Calibrating Health Policy Models: A Tutorial.校准健康政策模型的贝叶斯方法:教程
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Jun;35(6):613-624. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0494-4.
6
Estimation of Benefits, Burden, and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies: Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.结直肠癌筛查策略的益处、负担及危害评估:美国预防服务工作组的建模研究
JAMA. 2016 Jun 21;315(23):2595-609. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.6828.
7
Collaborative Modeling of the Benefits and Harms Associated With Different U.S. Breast Cancer Screening Strategies.美国不同乳腺癌筛查策略相关获益与危害的协同建模
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):215-25. doi: 10.7326/M15-1536. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
8
Validation of Models Used to Inform Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines: Accuracy and Implications.用于指导结直肠癌筛查指南的模型验证:准确性及影响
Med Decis Making. 2016 Jul;36(5):604-14. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15622642. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
9
CARE--pediatric colon adenocarcinoma: a case report and literature review comparing differences in clinical features between children and adult patients.CARE——小儿结肠腺癌:一例病例报告及文献综述,比较儿童与成年患者临床特征的差异
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Feb;94(6):e503. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000503.
10
Should colorectal cancer screening be considered in elderly persons without previous screening? A cost-effectiveness analysis.老年人无既往筛查史时是否应考虑进行结直肠癌筛查?一项成本效益分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Jun 3;160(11):750-9. doi: 10.7326/M13-2263.