• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

审视推特、红迪网和优兔上的主题和情感差异:以新冠疫苗副作用为例。

Examining thematic and emotional differences across Twitter, Reddit, and YouTube: The case of COVID-19 vaccine side effects.

作者信息

Kwon Soyeon, Park Albert

机构信息

Department of Management Information System, College of Business, Dongguk University, 30, Pildong-ro 1gil, Jung-gu, Seoul, 04620, Republic of Korea.

Department of Software and Information Systems, College of Computing and Informatics, UNC Charlotte, Woodward 310H, 9201 University City Blvd, Charlotte, NC, 28223, USA.

出版信息

Comput Human Behav. 2023 Jul;144:107734. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2023.107734. Epub 2023 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107734
PMID:36942128
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10016349/
Abstract

Social media discourse has become a key data source for understanding the public's perception of, and sentiments during a public health crisis. However, given the different niches which platforms occupy in terms of information exchange, reliance on a single platform would provide an incomplete picture of public opinions. Based on the schema theory, this study suggests a 'social media platform schema' to indicate users' different expectations based on previous usages of platform and argues that a platform's distinct characteristics foster distinct platform schema and, in turn, distinct nature of information. We analyzed COVID-19 vaccine side effect-related discussions from Twitter, Reddit, and YouTube, each of which represents a different type of the platform, and found thematic and emotional differences across platforms. Thematic analysis using -means clustering algorithm identified seven clusters in each platform. To computationally group and contrast thematic clusters across platforms, we employed modularity analysis using the Louvain algorithm to determine a semantic network structure based on themes. We also observed differences in emotional contexts across platforms. Theoretical and public health implications are then discussed.

摘要

社交媒体话语已成为理解公众在公共卫生危机期间的认知和情绪的关键数据源。然而,鉴于不同平台在信息交流方面占据不同的细分领域,仅依赖单一平台将无法全面呈现公众舆论。基于图式理论,本研究提出一种“社交媒体平台图式”,以表明用户基于先前平台使用情况的不同期望,并认为平台的独特特征会催生独特的平台图式,进而产生独特的信息性质。我们分析了来自推特、红迪网和优兔上与新冠疫苗副作用相关的讨论,每个平台都代表了不同类型的平台,并发现了各平台之间的主题和情感差异。使用K均值聚类算法进行的主题分析在每个平台中识别出七个聚类。为了通过计算对各平台的主题聚类进行分组和对比,我们采用基于鲁汶算法的模块化分析来确定基于主题的语义网络结构。我们还观察到各平台在情感语境上的差异。随后讨论了理论和公共卫生方面的意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/900f/10016349/a02eb6d04895/gr5_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/900f/10016349/dae80a5ca212/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/900f/10016349/201e3d32357f/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/900f/10016349/d306dde39472/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/900f/10016349/ba34758c0ae8/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/900f/10016349/a02eb6d04895/gr5_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/900f/10016349/dae80a5ca212/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/900f/10016349/201e3d32357f/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/900f/10016349/d306dde39472/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/900f/10016349/ba34758c0ae8/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/900f/10016349/a02eb6d04895/gr5_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Examining thematic and emotional differences across Twitter, Reddit, and YouTube: The case of COVID-19 vaccine side effects.审视推特、红迪网和优兔上的主题和情感差异:以新冠疫苗副作用为例。
Comput Human Behav. 2023 Jul;144:107734. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2023.107734. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
2
Comparing the Discussion of Telehealth in Two Social Media Platforms: Social Listening Analysis.比较两个社交媒体平台上远程医疗的讨论:社交倾听分析
Telemed Rep. 2023 Aug 3;4(1):236-248. doi: 10.1089/tmr.2023.0008. eCollection 2023.
3
Cross-platform analysis of public responses to the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence on Twitter and Reddit.跨平台分析公众在 Twitter 和 Reddit 上对 2019 年里德斯克里克地震序列的反应。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 31;12(1):1634. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05359-9.
4
Medical and Health-Related Misinformation on Social Media: Bibliometric Study of the Scientific Literature.社交媒体上的医疗健康相关错误信息:科学文献的文献计量研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 25;24(1):e28152. doi: 10.2196/28152.
5
Understanding Public Perceptions of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances: Infodemiology Study of Social Media.理解公众对全氟和多氟烷基物质的看法:社交媒体信息流行病学研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 11;24(3):e25614. doi: 10.2196/25614.
6
Examining the Utility of Social Media in COVID-19 Vaccination: Unsupervised Learning of 672,133 Twitter Posts.社交媒体在新冠疫苗接种中的应用研究:对 672,133 条推特帖子的无监督学习。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Nov 3;7(11):e29789. doi: 10.2196/29789.
7
Fine-tuned Sentiment Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccine-Related Social Media Data: Comparative Study.新冠疫苗相关社交媒体数据的微调情感分析:比较研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Oct 17;24(10):e40408. doi: 10.2196/40408.
8
COVID-19 and the 5G Conspiracy Theory: Social Network Analysis of Twitter Data.新冠疫情与5G阴谋论:基于推特数据的社交网络分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 6;22(5):e19458. doi: 10.2196/19458.
9
Public Discourse and Sentiment Toward Dementia on Chinese Social Media: Machine Learning Analysis of Weibo Posts.中文社交媒体中公众对痴呆症的话语和情绪:微博帖子的机器学习分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 2;24(9):e39805. doi: 10.2196/39805.
10
Between alternative and traditional social platforms: the case of gab in exploring the narratives on the pandemic and vaccines.在替代社交平台与传统社交平台之间:以Gab为例探讨关于疫情和疫苗的叙事
Front Sociol. 2023 Jul 17;8:1143263. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2023.1143263. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Leveraging Social Media Data to Understand the Impact of COVID-19 on Residents' Dietary Behaviors: Observational Study.利用社交媒体数据了解 COVID-19 对居民饮食行为的影响:观察性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 23;27:e51638. doi: 10.2196/51638.
2
Investigating Older Adults' Use of a Socially Assistive Robot via Time Series Clustering and User Profiling: Descriptive Analysis Study.基于时间序列聚类和用户画像的老年人对社交机器人使用情况的调查:描述性分析研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Sep 19;8:e41093. doi: 10.2196/41093.
3
Natural Language Processing-Powered Real-Time Monitoring Solution for Vaccine Sentiments and Hesitancy on Social Media: System Development and Validation.

本文引用的文献

1
The "Parallel Pandemic" in the Context of China: The Spread of Rumors and Rumor-Corrections During COVID-19 in Chinese Social Media.中国背景下的“平行大流行”:新冠疫情期间谣言及辟谣信息在中国社交媒体上的传播
Am Behav Sci. 2021 Dec;65(14):2014-2036. doi: 10.1177/00027642211003153.
2
Characterizing Discourse about COVID-19 Vaccines: A Reddit Version of the Pandemic Story.新冠疫苗相关话语的特征分析:Reddit 版的大流行故事
Health Data Sci. 2021 Aug 27;2021:9837856. doi: 10.34133/2021/9837856. eCollection 2021.
3
Attitudes toward COVID-19 Vaccination on Social Media: A Cross-Platform Analysis.
用于社交媒体上疫苗情绪和犹豫态度的自然语言处理驱动的实时监测解决方案:系统开发与验证
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Jun 21;12:e57164. doi: 10.2196/57164.
4
Understanding the Long Haulers of COVID-19: Mixed Methods Analysis of YouTube Content.了解新冠长期症状患者:对YouTube内容的混合方法分析
JMIR AI. 2024 Jun 3;3:e54501. doi: 10.2196/54501.
社交媒体上对新冠疫苗接种的态度:跨平台分析
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Jul 27;10(8):1190. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10081190.
4
Assessment of Attitudes, Main Concerns and Sources of Knowledge Regarding COVID-19 Vaccination in Poland in the Unvaccinated Individuals-A Nationwide Survey.波兰未接种新冠疫苗人群对新冠疫苗接种的态度、主要担忧及知识来源评估——一项全国性调查
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Mar 2;10(3):381. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10030381.
5
Spread of COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation in the Ninth Inning: Retrospective Observational Infodemic Study.新冠疫苗错误信息在最后阶段的传播:回顾性观察性信息疫情研究
JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 Mar 16;2(1):e33587. doi: 10.2196/33587. eCollection 2022 Jan-Jun.
6
Young Adults' Use of Different Social Media Platforms for Health Information: Insights From Web-Based Conversations.年轻人使用不同社交媒体平台获取健康信息:基于网络对话的见解
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 18;24(1):e23656. doi: 10.2196/23656.
7
COVID-19 Vaccine Tweets After Vaccine Rollout: Sentiment-Based Topic Modeling.疫苗接种后关于 COVID-19 疫苗的推文:基于情感的主题建模。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 8;24(2):e31726. doi: 10.2196/31726.
8
Understanding user responses to the COVID-19 pandemic on Twitter from a terror management theory perspective: Cultural differences among the US, UK and India.从恐惧管理理论视角理解推特用户对新冠疫情的反应:美国、英国和印度之间的文化差异
Comput Human Behav. 2022 Mar;128:107087. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107087. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
9
Factors Driving the Popularity and Virality of COVID-19 Vaccine Discourse on Twitter: Text Mining and Data Visualization Study.推动 COVID-19 疫苗话题在 Twitter 上流行和传播的因素:文本挖掘和数据可视化研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Dec 3;7(12):e32814. doi: 10.2196/32814.
10
COVID-19 vaccination intention and vaccine characteristics influencing vaccination acceptance: a global survey of 17 countries.COVID-19 疫苗接种意愿和影响疫苗接种接受度的疫苗特征:对 17 个国家的全球调查。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2021 Oct 7;10(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s40249-021-00900-w.