Lyles School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907.
Institute for Data, Systems, and Society, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Feb 22;119(8). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2111997119.
With rapid urbanization and increasing climate risks, enhancing the resilience of urban systems has never been more important. Despite the availability of massive datasets of human behavior (e.g., mobile phone data, satellite imagery), studies on disaster resilience have been limited to using static measures as proxies for resilience. However, static metrics have significant drawbacks such as their inability to capture the effects of compounding and accumulating disaster shocks; dynamic interdependencies of social, economic, and infrastructure systems; and critical transitions and regime shifts, which are essential components of the complex disaster resilience process. In this article, we argue that the disaster resilience literature needs to take the opportunities of big data and move toward a different research direction, which is to develop data-driven, dynamical complex systems models of disaster resilience. Data-driven complex systems modeling approaches could overcome the drawbacks of static measures and allow us to quantitatively model the dynamic recovery trajectories and intrinsic resilience characteristics of communities in a generic manner by leveraging large-scale and granular observations. This approach brings a paradigm shift in modeling the disaster resilience process and its linkage with the recovery process, paving the way to answering important questions for policy applications via counterfactual analysis and simulations.
随着城市化的快速发展和气候风险的不断增加,增强城市系统的韧性变得至关重要。尽管人类行为的大数据(例如,移动电话数据、卫星图像)已经可用,但灾难恢复力研究一直局限于使用静态指标作为恢复力的替代指标。然而,静态指标存在显著的缺点,例如无法捕捉复合和累积灾难冲击的影响、社会、经济和基础设施系统的动态相互依存关系,以及关键的转变和制度转变,这些都是复杂灾难恢复力过程的重要组成部分。在本文中,我们认为,灾难恢复力文献需要利用大数据提供的机会,朝着一个不同的研究方向发展,即开发数据驱动的、动态的灾难恢复力复杂系统模型。数据驱动的复杂系统建模方法可以克服静态指标的缺点,使我们能够通过利用大规模和细粒度的观测来以通用的方式定量模拟社区的动态恢复轨迹和内在恢复力特征。这种方法在对灾难恢复力过程及其与恢复过程的联系进行建模方面带来了范式转变,为通过反事实分析和模拟回答政策应用中的重要问题铺平了道路。