Suppr超能文献

对STAPH-IDENT系统和传统方法用于葡萄球菌属、口腔球菌属和微球菌属参考鉴定的四年前瞻性研究

Four-year prospective study of STAPH-IDENT system and conventional method for reference identification of Staphylococcus, Stomatococcus, and Micrococcus spp.

作者信息

Rhoden D L, Miller J M

机构信息

Noscomial Pathogens Laboratory Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Jan;33(1):96-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.1.96-98.1995.

Abstract

A 4-year prospective study compared the accuracy of the STAPH-IDENT system (bioMérieux Vitek, Inc., Hazelwood, Mo.) with that of the reference procedure of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for the identification of Staphylococcus species, Stomatococcus mucilaginosus, and Micrococcus species. The study compared the results from 1,106 cultures (500 eye cultures, 217 strains submitted for reference identification, and 389 known stock strains) representing 21 species of the family Micrococcaceae. The overall agreement of genus and species identifications was 81.1%. The percent agreement for the five most common clinical isolates was as follows: Staphylococcus epidermidis, 97.1% (517 isolates); Staphylococcus hominis, 82.5% (57 isolates); Staphylococcus aureus, 77.2% (162 isolates); Staphylococcus haemolyticus, 75.8% (61 isolates); and Staphylococcus warneri, 64.1% (39 isolates). The lowest percent agreement was with Staphylococcus cohnii (11.1%; (9 isolates). Of the 217 isolates sent to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for identification, 60.4% (131) were correctly identified by the STAPH-IDENT system. Of these, S. epidermidis accounted for 23.9%, S. aureus accounted for 15.6%, S. warneri accounted for 6.9%, Staphylococcus lugdunensis accounted for 6.5%, S. haemolyticus accounted for 5.5%, and S. hominis accounted for 4.1%. The STAPH-IDENT system did not perform adequately when dealing with commonly encountered organisms and is unsuitable for identifying uncommon isolates.

摘要

一项为期4年的前瞻性研究将STAPH-IDENT系统(生物梅里埃公司,密苏里州黑兹尔伍德)与美国疾病控制与预防中心用于鉴定葡萄球菌属、黏性口腔球菌和微球菌属的参考程序的准确性进行了比较。该研究比较了代表微球菌科21个物种的1106份培养物(500份眼部培养物、217份提交用于参考鉴定的菌株以及389份已知标准菌株)的结果。属和种鉴定的总体一致性为81.1%。五种最常见临床分离株的一致性百分比分别如下:表皮葡萄球菌,97.1%(517株分离株);人葡萄球菌,82.5%(57株);金黄色葡萄球菌,77.2%(162株);溶血葡萄球菌,75.8%(61株);沃氏葡萄球菌,64.1%(39株)。一致性百分比最低的是科氏葡萄球菌(11.1%;9株)。在送往美国疾病控制与预防中心进行鉴定的217株分离株中,STAPH-IDENT系统正确鉴定了60.4%(131株)。其中,表皮葡萄球菌占23.9%,金黄色葡萄球菌占15.6%,沃氏葡萄球菌占6.9%,路邓葡萄球菌占6.5%,溶血葡萄球菌占5.5%,人葡萄球菌占4.1%。STAPH-IDENT系统在处理常见微生物时表现不佳,不适用于鉴定罕见分离株。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验