• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于快速鉴定革兰氏阴性杆菌的自动细菌鉴定系统的准确性和精密度:一项合作评估。

Accuracy and precision of the autobac system for rapid identification of Gram-negative bacilli: a collaborative evaluation.

作者信息

Barry A L, Gavan T L, Smith P B, Matsen J M, Morello J A, Sielaff B H

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Jun;15(6):1111-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.6.1111-1119.1982.

DOI:10.1128/jcm.15.6.1111-1119.1982
PMID:7050149
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC272262/
Abstract

Gram-negative bacilli were identified within 3 to 6 h by determining susceptibility to 18 different antibacterial agents in the Autobac I system and by applying a two-stage quadratic discriminant analysis to the susceptibility patterns. The Autobac system was compared with standard reference methods for identifying glucose nonfermenters and glucose fermenters. Intralaboratory and interlaboratory precision of the Autobac system was comparable to that of the reference methods. Sensitivity (accuracy) and specificity of the two systems were also comparable, although there were some differences with certain species. Autobac responses were considered to be equivocal (needing additional tests) if the relative probability of an accurate identification was less than 0.70. Only 5% of 2,889 strains produced such equivocal results; a similar number of strains gave low probability levels with the reference methods. When the two systems disagreed, an independent reference laboratory arbitrated, confirming 49% of the Autobac responses and 36% of the reference identifications. With equivocal responses excluded, the overall accuracy of the Autobac system was 95.3% compared with 95.9% for the reference method. The respective accuracy estimates would be 93.8% and 93.1% if all first-choice identifications were evaluated.

摘要

通过在自动细菌鉴定仪I系统中测定对18种不同抗菌剂的敏感性,并对药敏模式应用两阶段二次判别分析,在3至6小时内鉴定出革兰氏阴性杆菌。将自动细菌鉴定系统与鉴定葡萄糖非发酵菌和葡萄糖发酵菌的标准参考方法进行比较。自动细菌鉴定系统在实验室内和实验室间的精密度与参考方法相当。两个系统的敏感性(准确性)和特异性也相当,尽管在某些菌种上存在一些差异。如果准确鉴定的相对概率小于0.70,则自动细菌鉴定仪的结果被认为是不明确的(需要额外测试)。在2889株菌株中,只有5%产生了这种不明确的结果;参考方法也有类似数量的菌株给出低概率水平。当两个系统结果不一致时,由一个独立的参考实验室进行仲裁,自动细菌鉴定仪的结果有49%得到确认,参考鉴定结果有36%得到确认。排除不明确的结果后,自动细菌鉴定系统的总体准确率为95.3%,而参考方法为95.9%。如果评估所有首选鉴定结果,各自的准确率估计分别为93.8%和93.1%。

相似文献

1
Accuracy and precision of the autobac system for rapid identification of Gram-negative bacilli: a collaborative evaluation.用于快速鉴定革兰氏阴性杆菌的自动细菌鉴定系统的准确性和精密度:一项合作评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Jun;15(6):1111-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.6.1111-1119.1982.
2
Novel approach to bacterial identification that uses the autobac system.使用自动细菌鉴定系统的新型细菌鉴定方法。
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Jun;15(6):1103-10. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.6.1103-1110.1982.
3
Direct comparison of two mechanized systems for identification of gram-negative bacilli. Autobac ID system versus the auto microbic system (with EBC plus).
Am J Clin Pathol. 1982 Oct;78(4):462-70. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/78.4.462.
4
Collaborative clinical evaluation of the Autobac IDX system for identification of gram-negative bacilli.用于鉴定革兰氏阴性杆菌的Autobac IDX系统的临床协作评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Apr;19(4):529-33. doi: 10.1128/jcm.19.4.529-533.1984.
5
Sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of the automicrobic system (with the Enterobacteriaceae-plus biochemical card) for identifying clinical isolates of Gram- negative bacilli.自动微生物系统(配备肠杆菌科加生化鉴定卡)用于鉴定革兰氏阴性杆菌临床分离株的敏感性、特异性和可重复性。
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Apr;15(4):582-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.4.582-588.1982.
6
Use of the Autobac IDX system for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae and nonfermentative gram-negative bacilli.使用自动细菌鉴定仪IDX系统快速鉴定肠杆菌科细菌和非发酵革兰氏阴性杆菌。
J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Feb;19(2):301-2. doi: 10.1128/jcm.19.2.301-302.1984.
7
Reliability of early identifications obtained with Enterobacteriaceae-plus biochemical cards in the automicrobic system.在自动微生物系统中使用肠杆菌科加生化鉴定卡进行早期鉴定的可靠性。
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Aug;16(2):257-65. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.2.257-265.1982.
8
Identification of gram-negative bacilli using the Autobac IDX.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1985 Jan;3(1):59-64. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(85)90067-7.
9
Automated, rapid identification of bacteria by pattern analysis of growth inhibition profiles obtained with Autobac 1.通过对使用Autobac 1获得的生长抑制图谱进行模式分析,自动、快速地鉴定细菌。
J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Jul;6(1):46-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.6.1.46-49.1977.
10
Rapid identification by the Micro-ID system of Enterobacteriaceae detected by urine screening.通过尿液筛查检测到的肠杆菌科细菌经Micro-ID系统快速鉴定。
J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Sep;14(3):295-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.14.3.295-297.1981.

引用本文的文献

1
Collaborative evaluation of the Abbott Avantage system for identification of frequently isolated nonfermentative or oxidase-positive gram-negative bacilli.对雅培Avantage系统用于鉴定常见分离出的非发酵或氧化酶阳性革兰氏阴性杆菌的协同评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Nov;20(5):899-904. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.5.899-904.1984.
2
A collaborative evaluation of a rapid automated bacterial identification system: the Autobac IDX.一种快速自动化细菌鉴定系统——Autobac IDX的协同评估。
Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Oct;3(5):419-23. doi: 10.1007/BF02017362.
3
Collaborative clinical evaluation of the Autobac IDX system for identification of gram-negative bacilli.用于鉴定革兰氏阴性杆菌的Autobac IDX系统的临床协作评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Apr;19(4):529-33. doi: 10.1128/jcm.19.4.529-533.1984.
4
Use of the Autobac IDX system for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae and nonfermentative gram-negative bacilli.使用自动细菌鉴定仪IDX系统快速鉴定肠杆菌科细菌和非发酵革兰氏阴性杆菌。
J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Feb;19(2):301-2. doi: 10.1128/jcm.19.2.301-302.1984.
5
Comparison of API 20E, API rapid E, and API rapid NFT for identification of members of the family Vibrionaceae.用于鉴定弧菌科成员的API 20E、API快速E及API快速NFT的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Nov;22(5):778-81. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.5.778-781.1985.
6
Comparison of the API rapid E four-hour system with the API 20E overnight system for the identification of routine clinical isolates of the family Enterobacteriaceae.用于鉴定肠杆菌科常规临床分离株的API快速E四小时系统与API 20E过夜系统的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Apr;21(4):542-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.4.542-545.1985.
7
Feasibility of same-day identification of members of the family Vibrionaceae by the API 20E system.应用API 20E系统当日鉴定弧菌科菌属成员的可行性
J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Apr;23(4):715-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.4.715-717.1986.
8
Critical evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system gram-negative identification card for identification of glucose-nonfermenting gram-negative rods.对用于鉴定葡萄糖非发酵革兰氏阴性杆菌的自动微生物系统革兰氏阴性鉴定卡的批判性评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Feb;23(2):251-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.2.251-257.1986.
9
Automated systems for identification of microorganisms.微生物鉴定自动化系统
Clin Microbiol Rev. 1992 Jul;5(3):302-27. doi: 10.1128/CMR.5.3.302.

本文引用的文献

1
Identification of Pseudomonas pyocyanea by the oxidase reaction.通过氧化酶反应鉴定绿脓杆菌。
Nature. 1956 Sep 29;178(4535):703. doi: 10.1038/178703a0.
2
Computer identification of bacteria on the basis of their antibiotic susceptibility patterns.基于抗生素敏感性模式的细菌计算机识别
Appl Microbiol. 1973 Sep;26(3):314-7. doi: 10.1128/am.26.3.314-317.1973.
3
Computer-assisted bacterial identification utilizing antimicrobial susceptibility profiles generated by autobac 1.利用自动细菌鉴定仪1生成的抗菌药敏谱进行计算机辅助细菌鉴定
J Clin Microbiol. 1976 Feb;3(2):105-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.3.2.105-109.1976.
4
Identification of Enterobacteriaceae in frozen microdilution trays prepared by Micro-Media Systems.由微媒体系统公司制备的冷冻微量稀释板中肠杆菌科细菌的鉴定。
J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Oct;10(4):492-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.10.4.492-496.1979.
5
Rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the micro-ID system versus API 20E and conventional media.使用微ID系统与API 20E及传统培养基对肠杆菌科细菌进行快速鉴定。
J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Sep;10(3):293-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.10.3.293-298.1979.