• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

压力性进食:一项关于德国成年人饮食行为、慰藉食物和健康食物替代品的在线调查。

Stress eating: an online survey of eating behaviours, comfort foods, and healthy food substitutes in German adults.

作者信息

Gemesi Kathrin, Holzmann Sophie Laura, Kaiser Birgit, Wintergerst Monika, Lurz Martin, Groh Georg, Böhm Markus, Krcmar Helmut, Gedrich Kurt, Hauner Hans, Holzapfel Christina

机构信息

Institute for Nutritional Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 62, 80992, Munich, Germany.

Research Group Public Health Nutrition, ZIEL - Institute for Food & Health, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2022 Feb 24;22(1):391. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12787-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-022-12787-9
PMID:35209876
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8868035/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In many people, stress is associated with changes in eating behaviour. Food products consumed during stress (comfort foods) are often unhealthy. It is rather unknown what comfort foods are consumed in Germany and what healthier food products are considered as alternatives to support stress-eaters in making healthier food choices.

METHODS

This online survey was conducted in spring 2021 throughout Germany. Participants were digitally recruited by newsletters, homepages, social media, and mailing lists. The survey included a standardized questionnaire with items concerning e.g. sociodemography, stress, and nutrition. Comfort foods were pre-selected through literature search and food substitutes were defined and discussed by experts. Analyses examined comfort food consumption and substitute preferences dependent on sex, age, body mass index (BMI), and being a self-identified stress-eater. The statistical analysis was performed using R.

RESULTS

Survey participants were mostly female (80.6%, 994/1234), had a mean age of 31.4 ± 12.8 years and a mean BMI of 23.4 ± 4.3 kg/m. Participants stated, that the two favourite comfort foods were chocolate (consumed often/very often by 48.3%, 596/1234) and coffee (consumed often/very often by 45.9%, 566/1234). Regarding food substitutes, the most frequently named alternative food for chocolate and cookies was fresh fruits (for chocolate: 74.4%, 815/1096, for cookies: 62.6%, 565/902). Tea without added sugar (64.4%, 541/840) was the preferred substitute for coffee. Almost 50% of participants (48.1%, 594/1234) identified themselves as stress-eaters, of which 68.9% (408/592) stated to eat (very) often more than usual in subjective stress situations.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from this work suggest that specific comfort foods and substitutes are preferred by the participants in stressful situations. This knowledge about food choices and substitutes should be investigated in further studies to improve eating behaviour in stressful situations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The survey was registered in the German Register of Clinical Studies (Registration number: DRKS00023984 ).

摘要

背景

在许多人当中,压力与饮食行为的改变有关。压力期间食用的食品(慰藉食品)往往不健康。在德国,人们食用哪些慰藉食品,以及哪些更健康的食品可被视为替代品,以帮助压力进食者做出更健康的食物选择,目前尚不清楚。

方法

这项在线调查于2021年春季在德国全国范围内进行。通过时事通讯、主页、社交媒体和邮件列表以数字方式招募参与者。该调查包括一份标准化问卷,其中包含有关社会人口统计学、压力和营养等方面的问题。通过文献检索预先选择慰藉食品,并由专家定义和讨论食物替代品。分析根据性别、年龄、体重指数(BMI)以及自我认定为压力进食者的情况,研究慰藉食品的消费情况和替代品偏好。使用R进行统计分析。

结果

调查参与者大多为女性(80.6%,994/1234),平均年龄为31.4±12.8岁,平均BMI为23.4±4.3kg/m²。参与者表示,最喜欢的两种慰藉食品是巧克力(经常/非常经常食用的占48.3%,596/1234)和咖啡(经常/非常经常食用的占45.9%,566/1234)。关于食物替代品,巧克力和饼干最常被提及的替代食品是新鲜水果(巧克力:74.4%,815/1096;饼干:62.6%,565/902)。不加糖的茶(64.4%,541/840)是咖啡的首选替代品。近50%的参与者(48.1%,594/1234)认为自己是压力进食者,其中68.9%(408/592)表示在主观压力情境下(非常)经常比平时吃得更多。

结论

这项研究的结果表明,参与者在压力情境下更喜欢特定的慰藉食品和替代品。关于食物选择和替代品的这些知识应在进一步研究中进行调查,以改善压力情境下的饮食行为。

试验注册

该调查已在德国临床研究注册中心注册(注册号:DRKS00023984)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ce0/8876374/ee5636d31100/12889_2022_12787_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ce0/8876374/ee5636d31100/12889_2022_12787_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ce0/8876374/ee5636d31100/12889_2022_12787_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Stress eating: an online survey of eating behaviours, comfort foods, and healthy food substitutes in German adults.压力性进食:一项关于德国成年人饮食行为、慰藉食物和健康食物替代品的在线调查。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Feb 24;22(1):391. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12787-9.
2
Cookie or clementine? Psychophysiological stress reactivity and recovery after eating healthy and unhealthy comfort foods.吃健康和不健康的安慰食品后,曲奇或橘子?心理生理应激反应和恢复。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2019 Sep;107:26-36. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2019.04.022. Epub 2019 May 1.
3
Stress-induced hyperphagia: empirical characterization of stress-overeaters.应激诱导的多食:应激性暴食者的实证特征。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jan 14;22(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12488-9.
4
Trends in food consumption and nutrient intake in Germany between 2006 and 2012: results of the German National Nutrition Monitoring (NEMONIT).2006年至2012年德国食物消费与营养摄入趋势:德国国家营养监测(NEMONIT)结果
Br J Nutr. 2016 Apr;115(8):1498-507. doi: 10.1017/S0007114516000544. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
5
Healthy versus unhealthy comfort eating for psychophysiological stress recovery in low-income Black and Latinx adults.低收人群体中的黑人和拉丁裔成年人的心理生理性应激恢复中的健康与不健康的舒适型进食。
Appetite. 2022 Sep 1;176:106140. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106140. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
6
Quality of diet and food choices of Finnish young men: a sociodemographic and health behaviour approach.芬兰青年的饮食质量和食物选择:社会人口学和健康行为方法。
Public Health Nutr. 2010 Jun;13(6A):980-6. doi: 10.1017/S1368980010001187.
7
"I enjoy the good foods, all of which are not good for me." The categorization and moralization of food.“我喜欢好吃的食物,但这些食物对我都没好处。”食物的分类和道德化。
Appetite. 2023 Dec 1;191:107071. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2023.107071. Epub 2023 Oct 1.
8
Food consumption of adults in Germany: results of the German National Nutrition Survey II based on diet history interviews.德国成年人的食物消费情况:基于饮食史访谈的德国第二次全国营养调查结果。
Br J Nutr. 2015 May 28;113(10):1603-14. doi: 10.1017/S0007114515000744. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
9
Exploring comfort food preferences across age and gender.探索不同年龄和性别的安慰食物偏好。
Physiol Behav. 2003 Sep;79(4-5):739-47. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9384(03)00203-8.
10
Do perceived norms of social media users' eating habits and preferences predict our own food consumption and BMI?社交媒体用户饮食习惯和偏好的感知规范是否能预测我们自己的食物消费和 BMI?
Appetite. 2020 Jun 1;149:104611. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104611. Epub 2020 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Why Do We Eat Comfort Food? Exploring Expectations Regarding Comfort Food and Their Relationship with Comfort Eating Frequency.我们为什么吃慰藉食物?探索对慰藉食物的期望及其与慰藉饮食频率的关系。
Nutrients. 2025 Jul 8;17(14):2259. doi: 10.3390/nu17142259.
2
Interrelation of Stress, Eating Behavior, and Body Adiposity in Women with Obesity: Do Emotions Matter?肥胖女性的压力、饮食行为与身体肥胖之间的相互关系:情绪起作用吗?
Nutrients. 2024 Nov 29;16(23):4133. doi: 10.3390/nu16234133.
3
Long-lasting effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on lifestyle and body weight: results of representative cross-sectional surveys in adults in Germany.

本文引用的文献

1
Stress-induced hyperphagia: empirical characterization of stress-overeaters.应激诱导的多食:应激性暴食者的实证特征。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jan 14;22(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12488-9.
2
Relationships among perceived stress, emotional eating, and dietary intake in college students: Eating self-regulation as a mediator.大学生感知压力、情绪性进食与饮食摄入的关系:饮食自我调节的中介作用。
Appetite. 2021 Aug 1;163:105215. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105215. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
3
Changes in Food Consumption During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Analysis of Consumer Survey Data From the First Lockdown Period in Denmark, Germany, and Slovenia.
COVID-19 大流行对生活方式和体重的长期影响:德国成年人代表性横断面调查的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Apr 30;24(1):1199. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18680-x.
4
Comfort food concepts and contexts in which they are used: A scoping review protocol.慰藉食物的概念及其使用背景:一项范围综述方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 24;19(4):e0299991. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299991. eCollection 2024.
5
Characterization of adults concerning the use of a hypothetical mHealth application addressing stress-overeating: an online survey.描述成年人使用一款假设的移动健康应用程序来应对压力性暴饮暴食的情况:一项在线调查。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Apr 4;24(1):958. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18383-3.
6
Physical activity and nutrition in relation to resilience: a cross-sectional study.身体活动和营养与恢复力的关系:一项横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 27;14(1):2272. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52753-6.
7
The Impact of the COVID-19 Epidemic on the Mood and Diet of Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery.新冠疫情对接受减重手术患者的情绪和饮食的影响。
Nutrients. 2022 Jul 12;14(14):2849. doi: 10.3390/nu14142849.
新冠疫情期间的食品消费变化:丹麦、德国和斯洛文尼亚首次封锁期消费者调查数据分析
Front Nutr. 2021 Mar 8;8:635859. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.635859. eCollection 2021.
4
Perceived stress and diet quality in women of reproductive age: a systematic review and meta-analysis.育龄期妇女感知压力与饮食质量:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nutr J. 2020 Aug 28;19(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12937-020-00609-w.
5
Impact of Stress Levels on Eating Behaviors among College Students.压力水平对大学生饮食行为的影响。
Nutrients. 2020 Apr 27;12(5):1241. doi: 10.3390/nu12051241.
6
Food Selection Under Stress Among Undergraduate Students in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯利雅得大学生在压力下的食物选择
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2020 Feb 28;13:211-221. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S236953. eCollection 2020.
7
Negative affect is associated with increased stress-eating for women with high perceived life stress.对于感知到生活压力较大的女性而言,消极情绪与压力性暴饮暴食的增加有关。
Physiol Behav. 2019 Oct 15;210:112639. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.112639. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
8
Stress and Obesity.压力与肥胖。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2019 Jan 4;70:703-718. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102936. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
9
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of nudging to increase fruit and vegetable choice.系统评价和荟萃分析促进选择水果和蔬菜的有效性。
Eur J Public Health. 2017 Oct 1;27(5):912-920. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx085.
10
Personality differences in the susceptibility to stress-eating: The influence of emotional control and impulsivity.压力性进食易感性中的人格差异:情绪控制和冲动性的影响。
Eat Behav. 2016 Dec;23:76-81. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2016.07.009. Epub 2016 Jul 15.