Departments of Complex Systems and Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05401, United States.
Cereb Cortex. 2022 Dec 15;33(1):176-194. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhac060.
The use of predefined parcellations on surface-based representations of the brain as a method for data reduction is common across neuroimaging studies. In particular, prediction-based studies typically employ parcellation-driven summaries of brain measures as input to predictive algorithms, but the choice of parcellation and its influence on performance is often ignored. Here we employed preprocessed structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study® to examine the relationship between 220 parcellations and out-of-sample predictive performance across 45 phenotypic measures in a large sample of 9- to 10-year-old children (N = 9,432). Choice of machine learning (ML) pipeline and use of alternative multiple parcellation-based strategies were also assessed. Relative parcellation performance was dependent on the spatial resolution of the parcellation, with larger number of parcels (up to ~4,000) outperforming coarser parcellations, according to a power-law scaling of between 1/4 and 1/3. Performance was further influenced by the type of parcellation, ML pipeline, and general strategy, with existing literature-based parcellations, a support vector-based pipeline, and ensembling across multiple parcellations, respectively, as the highest performing. These findings highlight the choice of parcellation as an important influence on downstream predictive performance, showing in some cases that switching to a higher resolution parcellation can yield a relatively large boost to performance.
在基于大脑表面的表示形式上使用预定义的分割作为数据减少的方法在神经影像学研究中很常见。特别是,基于预测的研究通常采用基于分割的大脑测量摘要作为输入到预测算法中,但分割的选择及其对性能的影响往往被忽略。在这里,我们使用来自青少年大脑认知发展研究®的预处理结构磁共振成像 (sMRI) 数据,在一个包含 9 至 10 岁儿童的大样本中(N=9432),检查了 220 个分割与 45 个表型测量的样本外预测性能之间的关系。我们还评估了机器学习 (ML) 管道的选择和替代的基于多个分割的策略的使用。相对分割性能取决于分割的空间分辨率,随着分割的数量增加(最多约 4000 个),根据 1/4 到 1/3 的幂律缩放,性能优于较粗的分割。性能还受到分割类型、ML 管道和一般策略的影响,基于现有文献的分割、基于支持向量的管道和多个分割的集成分别具有最高的性能。这些发现强调了分割选择作为下游预测性能的重要影响,在某些情况下,切换到更高分辨率的分割可以相对较大地提高性能。