H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Metron, Inc., Reston, VA, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 14;22(1):496. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12910-w.
Thousands of school systems have struggled with the decisions about how to deliver education safely and effectively amid the COVID19 pandemic. This study evaluates the public health impact of various school reopening scenarios (when, and how to return to in-person instruction) on the spread of COVID19.
An agent-based simulation model was adapted and used to project the impact of various school reopening strategies on the number of infections, hospitalizations, and deaths in the state of Georgia during the study period, i.e., February 18-November 24, 2020. The tested strategies include (i) schools closed, i.e., all students receive online instruction, (ii) alternating school day, i.e., half of the students receive in-person instruction on Mondays and Wednesdays and the other half on Tuesdays and Thursdays, (iii) alternating school day for children, i.e., half of the children (ages 0-9) receive in-person instruction on Mondays and Wednesdays and the other half on Tuesdays and Thursdays, (iv) children only, i.e., only children receive in-person instruction, (v) regular, i.e., all students return to in-person instruction. We also tested the impact of universal masking in schools.
Across all scenarios, the number of COVID19-related deaths ranged from approximately 8.8 to 9.9 thousand, the number of cumulative infections ranged from 1.76 to 1.96 million for adults and 625 to 771 thousand for children and youth, and the number of COVID19-related hospitalizations ranged from approximately 71 to 80 thousand during the study period. Compared to schools reopening August 10 with a regular reopening strategy, the percentage of the population infected reduced by 13%, 11%, 9%, and 6% in the schools closed, alternating school day for children, children only, and alternating school day reopening strategies, respectively. Universal masking in schools for all students further reduced outcome measures.
Reopening schools following a regular reopening strategy would lead to higher deaths, hospitalizations, and infections. Hybrid in-person and online reopening strategies, especially if offered as an option to families and teachers who prefer to opt-in, provide a good balance in reducing the infection spread compared to the regular reopening strategy, while ensuring access to in-person education.
在 COVID19 大流行期间,数千个学校系统一直在努力做出关于如何安全有效地提供教育的决策。本研究评估了各种学校重新开放场景(何时以及如何恢复面对面教学)对 COVID19 传播的公共卫生影响。
改编了基于代理的仿真模型,并用于预测在研究期间(即 2020 年 2 月 18 日至 11 月 24 日),佐治亚州重新开放学校策略对感染、住院和死亡人数的影响。测试的策略包括:(i) 关闭学校,即所有学生接受在线教学;(ii) 交错上学日,即一半学生在周一和周三接受面对面教学,另一半在周二和周四接受面对面教学;(iii) 儿童交错上学日,即一半儿童(0-9 岁)在周一和周三接受面对面教学,另一半在周二和周四接受面对面教学;(iv) 仅儿童,即仅儿童接受面对面教学;(v) 常规,即所有学生返回面对面教学。我们还测试了学校普遍戴口罩的影响。
在所有场景中,与 COVID19 相关的死亡人数约为 8800 至 9900 人,累计感染人数为成年人 176 至 1960 万人,儿童和青少年 62.5 至 77.1 万人,与 COVID19 相关的住院人数约为 7100 至 8000 人。与 8 月 10 日常规重新开放策略相比,在关闭学校、儿童交错上学日、仅儿童和交错上学日重新开放策略中,受感染人群的比例分别降低了 13%、11%、9%和 6%。对所有学生实行学校普遍戴口罩的措施进一步降低了各项评估指标。
遵循常规重新开放策略重新开放学校将导致更高的死亡、住院和感染人数。混合面对面和在线重新开放策略,特别是如果作为家庭和教师的选择提供,与常规重新开放策略相比,在减少感染传播方面提供了良好的平衡,同时确保获得面对面教育。