• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

信息来源类型和防护信息对脸书上新闻信息批判性评估的影响:荷兰的随机对照试验

Effect of Source Type and Protective Message on the Critical Evaluation of News Messages on Facebook: Randomized Controlled Trial in the Netherlands.

作者信息

Folkvord Frans, Snelting Freek, Anschutz Doeschka, Hartmann Tilo, Theben Alexandra, Gunderson Laura, Vermeulen Ivar, Lupiáñez-Villanueva Francisco

机构信息

Open Evidence Research, Open Evidence, Barcelona, Spain.

Nijmegen, Netherlands.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 31;24(3):e27945. doi: 10.2196/27945.

DOI:10.2196/27945
PMID:35357314
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9015754/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Disinformation has become an increasing societal concern, especially due to the speed that news is shared in the digital era. In particular, disinformation in the health care sector can lead to serious casualties, as the current COVID-19 crisis clearly shows.

OBJECTIVE

The main aim of this study was to experimentally examine the effects of information about the source and a protective warning message on users' critical evaluation of news items, as well as the perception of accuracy of the news item.

METHODS

A 3 (unreliable vs reliable vs no identified source) × 2 (with protective message vs without) between-subject design was conducted among 307 participants (mean age 29 (SD 10.9] years).

RESULTS

The results showed a significant effect of source information on critical evaluation. In addition, including a protective message did not significantly affect critical evaluation. The results showed no interaction between type of source and protective message on critical evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on these results, it is questionable whether including protective messages to improve critical evaluation is a way to move forward and improve critical evaluation of health-related news items, although effective methodologies to tackle the spread of disinformation are highly needed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05030883; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05030883.

摘要

背景

虚假信息已成为日益严重的社会问题,尤其是在数字时代新闻传播速度极快的情况下。特别是医疗保健领域的虚假信息可能导致严重伤亡,当前的新冠疫情危机就清楚地表明了这一点。

目的

本研究的主要目的是通过实验检验关于信息来源的信息以及一条保护性警告信息对用户对新闻报道的批判性评估以及对新闻报道准确性感知的影响。

方法

在307名参与者(平均年龄29岁(标准差10.9岁))中进行了一项3(不可靠来源与可靠来源与未指明来源)×2(有保护性信息与无保护性信息)的组间设计。

结果

结果表明来源信息对批判性评估有显著影响。此外,包含保护性信息并未对批判性评估产生显著影响。结果显示来源类型与保护性信息在批判性评估方面不存在交互作用。

结论

基于这些结果,尽管迫切需要有效的方法来应对虚假信息的传播,但通过包含保护性信息来改善批判性评估是否是推进和改善对健康相关新闻报道批判性评估的一种方式仍值得怀疑。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05030883;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05030883 。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e7d/9015754/dd81397ac599/jmir_v24i3e27945_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e7d/9015754/732ab9667bc7/jmir_v24i3e27945_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e7d/9015754/2dba809426b9/jmir_v24i3e27945_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e7d/9015754/dd81397ac599/jmir_v24i3e27945_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e7d/9015754/732ab9667bc7/jmir_v24i3e27945_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e7d/9015754/2dba809426b9/jmir_v24i3e27945_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e7d/9015754/dd81397ac599/jmir_v24i3e27945_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of Source Type and Protective Message on the Critical Evaluation of News Messages on Facebook: Randomized Controlled Trial in the Netherlands.信息来源类型和防护信息对脸书上新闻信息批判性评估的影响:荷兰的随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 31;24(3):e27945. doi: 10.2196/27945.
2
Fake News and the Sleeper Effect in Social Media Posts: the Case of Perception of Safety in the Workplace.假新闻和社交媒体帖子中的潜伏效应:工作场所安全感知案例。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2023 Jul;26(7):554-562. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2022.0199. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
3
Effects of Disinformation Using Deepfake: The Protective Effect of Media Literacy Education.利用深度伪造信息的影响:媒体素养教育的保护作用。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2021 Mar;24(3):188-193. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2020.0174. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
4
The Prevalence and Impact of Fake News on COVID-19 Vaccination in Taiwan: Retrospective Study of Digital Media.《台湾地区假新闻对 COVID-19 疫苗接种的流行与影响:数字媒体回溯性研究》
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 26;24(4):e36830. doi: 10.2196/36830.
5
Conversations and Medical News Frames on Twitter: Infodemiological Study on COVID-19 in South Korea.推特上的对话与医学新闻框架:韩国新冠肺炎信息流行病学研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 5;22(5):e18897. doi: 10.2196/18897.
6
The Evaluation of a Social Media Campaign to Increase COVID-19 Testing in Migrant Groups: Cluster Randomized Trial.社交媒体活动评估以增加移民群体的 COVID-19 检测:集群随机试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 24;24(3):e34544. doi: 10.2196/34544.
7
Mobile Phone Text Messaging for Tobacco Risk Communication Among Young Adult Community College Students: Protocol and Baseline Overview for a Randomized Controlled Trial.面向青年成人社区大学生的烟草风险沟通手机短信:一项随机对照试验的方案与基线概述
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Oct 15;7(10):e10977. doi: 10.2196/10977.
8
Demographic Factors Influencing the Impact of Coronavirus-Related Misinformation on WhatsApp: Cross-sectional Questionnaire Study.影响 WhatsApp 上与冠状病毒相关错误信息影响的人口统计学因素:横断面问卷调查研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Jan 30;7(1):e19858. doi: 10.2196/19858.
9
Effect of a social media-based counselling intervention in countering fake news on COVID-19 vaccine in Nigeria.基于社交媒体的咨询干预对尼日利亚抗击新冠疫苗假新闻的效果。
Health Promot Int. 2022 Apr 29;37(2). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab140.
10
Optimizing the Presentation of Mental Health Information in Social Media: The Effects of Health Testimonials and Platform on Source Perceptions, Message Processing, and Health Outcomes.优化社交媒体中心理健康信息的呈现方式:健康证言和平台对来源感知、信息处理和健康结果的影响。
Health Commun. 2017 Sep;32(9):1121-1132. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2016.1214218. Epub 2016 Aug 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Social Media as an Effective Provider of Quality-Assured and Accurate Information to Increase Vaccine Rates: Systematic Review.社交媒体作为提供优质、准确信息以提高疫苗接种率的有效手段:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 26;25:e50276. doi: 10.2196/50276.
2
Distractions, analytical thinking and falling for fake news: A survey of psychological factors.注意力分散、分析性思维与轻信虚假新闻:一项心理因素调查
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2023;10(1):319. doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-01813-9. Epub 2023 Jun 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Climate Change Disinformation and How to Combat It.气候变化相关虚假信息及应对措施
Annu Rev Public Health. 2021 Apr 1;42:1-21. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-102409. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
2
Social media and vaccine hesitancy.社交媒体与疫苗犹豫
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Oct;5(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004206. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
3
Why do people spread false information online? The effects of message and viewer characteristics on self-reported likelihood of sharing social media disinformation.为什么人们会在网上传播虚假信息?信息和观众特征对自我报告的社交媒体虚假信息分享可能性的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 7;15(10):e0239666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239666. eCollection 2020.
4
Suicide Coverage in the Digital Press Media: Adherence to World Health Organization Guidelines and Effectiveness of Different Interventions Aimed at Media Professionals.数字新闻媒体中的自杀报道:对世界卫生组织准则的遵循情况以及针对媒体专业人员的不同干预措施的有效性。
Health Commun. 2020 Nov;35(13):1623-1632. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2019.1654176. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
5
The Rise and Development of Public Health Communication.公共卫生传播的兴起与发展。
Health Commun. 2020 Nov;35(13):1666-1677. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2019.1654180. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
6
The Effects of Social Determinants on Public Health Emergency Preparedness Mediated by Health Communication: The 2015 MERS Outbreak in South Korea.社会决定因素对健康传播中介的公共卫生应急准备的影响:2015 年韩国 MERS 爆发。
Health Commun. 2020 Oct;35(11):1396-1406. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2019.1636342. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
7
Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality.利用众包新闻来源质量判断来打击社交媒体上的错误信息。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Feb 12;116(7):2521-2526. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1806781116. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
8
A systematic review of mHealth interventions for the support of eating disorders.移动医疗干预支持进食障碍的系统评价。
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2018 Sep;26(5):394-416. doi: 10.1002/erv.2609. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
9
The spread of true and false news online.网络上真实和虚假新闻的传播。
Science. 2018 Mar 9;359(6380):1146-1151. doi: 10.1126/science.aap9559.
10
Debunking: A Meta-Analysis of the Psychological Efficacy of Messages Countering Misinformation.破除谣言:反驳错误信息的信息在心理功效方面的元分析
Psychol Sci. 2017 Nov;28(11):1531-1546. doi: 10.1177/0956797617714579. Epub 2017 Sep 12.