• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国社区居住老年人跌倒风险自我评估量表的信度和效度:一项初步研究。

Reliability and validity of the fall risk self-assessment scale for community-dwelling older people in China: a pilot study.

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Beijing, 100191, China.

Jimenli Community Health Service Center, North Third Ring West Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100088, China.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2022 Apr 1;22(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02962-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12877-022-02962-3
PMID:35365082
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8976342/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Falls are a common and serious public health issue among older adults, contributing to the loss of independence, psychological distress, and incapability to engage in meaningful occupations, etc. However, there is a lack of abundant information about the fall risk self-evaluation scale for community-dwelling older people. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the preliminary reliability and validity of the fall risk self-assessment scale (FRSAS) among community-dwelling older adults.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted. A total of 230 individuals aged 65 years and over were recruited by a convenience sampling between October and December 2020 from three communities in Haidian district, Beijing. Eligible participants were required to fill in the general condition questionnaire and the fall risk self-assessment scale. The reliability and validity were analyzed by using SPSS 20.0.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty-two participants completed the assessment as required (the completion rate was 96.52%). The most items of FRSAS were understood by older adults, which was completed in 10 min. Cronbach's α and intraclass correlation coefficient ICC (2,1) of the scale were 0.757 and 0.967 respectively, suggesting good internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Exploratory factor analysis yielded 14 factors that explained 61.744% of the variance. Five items failed to be categorized into any factors because the factor loading of these items was less than 0.4. A future large-sample study needs to be conducted to explore its construct validity. The total scores and dimensional scores except for C-dimension showed significant differences between participants who had experienced a fall in the previous 6 months and those who had not (P < 0.05), indicating good discriminant validity.

CONCLUSIONS

The fall risk self-assessment scale including 41 items demonstrated relatively high feasibility as well as satisfactory results in the internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and discriminant validity.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registration number: ChiCTR2000038856 ; Date of registration: 7 Oct 2020.

摘要

背景

跌倒在老年人中是一个常见且严重的公共卫生问题,会导致丧失独立性、心理困扰和无法从事有意义的职业等。然而,关于社区居住老年人的跌倒风险自我评估量表的信息并不丰富。因此,本研究旨在评估社区居住老年人跌倒风险自我评估量表(FRSAS)的初步信度和效度。

方法

采用横断面研究方法。2020 年 10 月至 12 月,通过便利抽样法从北京市海淀区 3 个社区招募了 230 名 65 岁及以上的老年人。合格的参与者需要填写一般情况问卷和跌倒风险自我评估量表。采用 SPSS 20.0 进行信度和效度分析。

结果

222 名参与者按要求完成评估(完成率为 96.52%)。FRSAS 的大部分项目老年人都能理解,完成时间为 10 分钟。量表的 Cronbach's α 和组内相关系数 ICC(2,1)分别为 0.757 和 0.967,表明具有良好的内部一致性和重测信度。探索性因子分析得出 14 个因子,解释了 61.744%的方差。5 个项目由于这些项目的因子负荷小于 0.4,未能归入任何因子。需要进行未来的大样本研究来探索其结构效度。在过去 6 个月内经历过跌倒的参与者与未经历过跌倒的参与者之间,总分和除 C 维度外的各维度得分均有显著差异(P<0.05),表明具有良好的区分效度。

结论

包括 41 个项目的跌倒风险自我评估量表具有较高的可行性,在内部一致性、重测信度和区分效度方面均取得了较好的结果。

临床试验注册

注册号:ChiCTR2000038856;注册日期:2020 年 10 月 7 日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d19/8976342/2c63cde7e197/12877_2022_2962_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d19/8976342/0aef4a806afe/12877_2022_2962_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d19/8976342/2c63cde7e197/12877_2022_2962_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d19/8976342/0aef4a806afe/12877_2022_2962_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d19/8976342/2c63cde7e197/12877_2022_2962_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity of the fall risk self-assessment scale for community-dwelling older people in China: a pilot study.中国社区居住老年人跌倒风险自我评估量表的信度和效度:一项初步研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Apr 1;22(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02962-3.
2
Examination of reliability and validity of the Self-Assessment Burden Scale-Motor for community-dwelling older adults in Japan: a validation study.日本社区居住老年人自我评估负担量表-运动部分的信度和效度检验:一项验证研究。
PeerJ. 2024 Jul 18;12:e17730. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17730. eCollection 2024.
3
Cross-cultural adaptation of the Taiwan Chinese version of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International for community-dwelling elderly individuals.《中文版跌倒效能量表-国际版》在社区居住老年人中的跨文化调适。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Nov 19;22(1):881. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03597-0.
4
[Study on the reliability and validity of the Chinese Criteria of Health Scale for the elderly people].[老年人健康量表中国常模的信效度研究]
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Dec 6;56(12):1809-1814. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20220223-00170.
5
Psychometric evaluation of the Protection Motivation Theory scale in assessing fall protection motivation among older adults to reduce fall risk.保护动机理论量表在评估老年人防跌倒保护动机以降低跌倒风险中的心理测量学评价。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Oct 31;23(1):703. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04372-5.
6
Clinical assessment of Persian translation of Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale in community-dwelling older adults.社区居住的老年人中 Fullerton 高级平衡量表波斯语翻译的临床评估。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Feb;42(4):567-573. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1503731. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
7
Development and validation of knowledge assessment scales on sarcopenia and fall for Chinese community-dwelling older adults.中文社区老年人肌少症和跌倒知识评估量表的编制与验证。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2023 Jun;23(6):430-436. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14596. Epub 2023 May 14.
8
The Chinese Short Version of the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale: Its Validity, Reliability, and Predictive Value for Future Falls in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.中文版活动特异性平衡信心量表的信度、效度和对社区居住老年人未来跌倒的预测价值。
Clin Interv Aging. 2022 Oct 3;17:1483-1491. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S380921. eCollection 2022.
9
Psychometric Properties and Measurement Invariance of the Chinese Version of the Brief Assessment of Impaired Cognition Questionnaire in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.中文版简明认知障碍问卷在社区居住老年人中的心理测量特性和测量不变性。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 17;10:908827. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.908827. eCollection 2022.
10
Reliability and Validity of the Floor Transfer Test as a Measure of Readiness for Independent Living Among Older Adults.老年人独立生活准备程度地板转移测试的信度和效度。
J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2019 Jul/Sep;42(3):136-147. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000142.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and preliminary validation of the nutrition literacy scale for type 2 diabetes mellitus in China-a mixed methods study.中国2型糖尿病营养素养量表的编制与初步验证——一项混合方法研究
Front Public Health. 2025 May 13;13:1569675. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1569675. eCollection 2025.
2
Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of fall risk questionnaire in to Amharic language.跌倒风险问卷跨文化适应、效度及信度:阿姆哈拉语版本
BMC Geriatr. 2025 May 17;25(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05962-1.
3
Evaluating the reliability and validity of the geriatric assessment of disability scale in older adults undergoing hemodialysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Fall definitions, faller classifications and outcomes used in falls research among people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review.多发性硬化症患者跌倒研究中使用的跌倒定义、跌倒者分类及结果:一项系统综述
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Mar;44(6):856-864. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1786173. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
2
Psychometric testing of the Fall Risks for Older People in the Community screening tool (FROP-Com screen) for community-dwelling people with stroke.社区居住的脑卒中患者使用的社区老年人跌倒风险筛查工具(FROP-Com 筛查)的心理计量学测试。
PLoS One. 2020 May 13;15(5):e0233045. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233045. eCollection 2020.
3
评估老年透析患者残疾评定量表的信度和效度。
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Apr 4;25(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05869-x.
4
Development and validation of the sarcopenia disease risk perception scale for older adults.老年人肌少症疾病风险感知量表的编制与验证。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Oct 25;24(1):876. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05487-z.
5
Translation, validity and reliability of the fall risk scale for older adults.老年人跌倒风险量表的翻译、效度和信度。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Aug 24;24(1):708. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05292-8.
6
A novel score for predicting falls in community-dwelling older people: a derivation and validation study.一种用于预测社区居住老年人跌倒的新型评分:推导和验证研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jun 4;24(1):491. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05064-4.
7
Fall risk question-based tools for fall screening in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review of the literature.基于跌倒风险问题的社区居住老年人跌倒筛查工具:文献系统评价
J Frailty Sarcopenia Falls. 2023 Dec 1;8(4):240-253. doi: 10.22540/JFSF-08-240. eCollection 2023 Dec.
8
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Arabic Version of the Fall Risk Questionnaire.Fall Risk Questionnaire 阿拉伯文版的跨文化调适与心理计量特性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Apr 21;20(8):5606. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20085606.
Development of a fall-risk assessment profile for community-dwelling older adults by using the National Health Interview Survey in Taiwan.
基于台湾国民健康访谈调查资料研发社区居住之老年人跌倒风险评估工具。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Feb 14;20(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8286-8.
4
Assessing the fall risks of community-dwelling stroke survivors using the Short-form Physiological Profile Assessment (S-PPA).使用简化生理概况评估(S-PPA)评估社区居住的中风幸存者的跌倒风险。
PLoS One. 2019 May 21;14(5):e0216769. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216769. eCollection 2019.
5
Reliability, validity, and clinical utility of a self-reported screening tool in the prediction of fall incidence in older adults.自我报告筛查工具预测老年人跌倒发生率的可靠性、有效性和临床实用性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Oct;42(21):3098-3105. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1582721. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
6
Incidence, risk factors and economic burden of fall-related injuries in older Chinese people: a systematic review.中国老年人跌倒相关伤害的发生率、危险因素和经济负担:系统评价。
Inj Prev. 2019 Feb;25(1):4-12. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2018-042982.
7
Multifactorial and multiple component interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community.预防社区老年人跌倒的多因素及多成分干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 23;7(7):CD012221. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012221.pub2.
8
Reliability, validity, and clinical feasibility of a rapid and objective assessment of post-stroke deficits in hand proprioception.一种快速、客观评估脑卒中后手本体感觉障碍的方法的可靠性、有效性和临床可行性研究。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018 Jun 7;15(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12984-018-0387-6.
9
Translation and validation study of the Chinese version Iconographical Falls Efficacy Scale-Short Version (Icon-FES).中文版本 Iconographical Falls Efficacy Scale-Short Version(Icon-FES)的翻译和验证研究。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 Jul-Aug;77:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2018.03.008. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
10
Timed Up and Go Test can predict recurrent falls: a longitudinal study of the community-dwelling elderly in China.计时起立行走测试可预测复发性跌倒:中国社区居住老年人的纵向研究。
Clin Interv Aging. 2017 Nov 28;12:2009-2016. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S138287. eCollection 2017.