Fernandes Renato, Ceylan Halil İbrahim, Clemente Filipe Manuel, Brito João Paulo, Martins Alexandre Duarte, Nobari Hadi, Reis Victor Machado, Oliveira Rafael
Sports Science School of Rio Maior-Polytechnic Institute of Santarém, 2040-413 Rio Maior, Portugal.
Life Quality Research Centre, 2040-413 Rio Maior, Portugal.
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Apr 7;10(4):695. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10040695.
Although data currently exists pertaining to the intensity in the women’s football match, the knowledge about training is still scarce. Therefore, the aim of this study was to quantify external (locomotor activity) and internal (psychophysiological) intensities, as well as the wellness profile of the typical microcycle from professional female soccer players during the 2019/20 in-season. Ten players (24.6 ± 2.3 years) from an elite Portuguese women soccer team participated in this study. All variables were collected in 87 training session and 15 matches for analysis from the 2019−2020 in-season. Global positioning variables such total distance, high-speed running, acceleration, deceleration and player load were recorded as intensity while Rated Perceived Exertion (RPE) and session-RPE were recorded as internal measures. The Hooper Index (HI) was collected as a wellness parameter. The results showed that internal and external intensity measures were greater in matches compared to trainings during the week (match day minus [MD-], MD-5, MD-4, MD-2), p < 0.05 with very large effect size (ES). In the same line, higher internal and external intensity values were found in the beginning of the week while the lowest values were found in MD-2 (p < 0.05, with very large ES). Regarding wellness, there was no significant differences in the HI parameters between the training days and match days (p > 0.05). This study confirmed the highest intensity values during MD and the lowest on the training session before the MD (MD-2). Moreover, higher training intensities were found in the beginning of the training week sessions which were then reduced when the MD came close. Wellness parameters showed no variation when compared to intensity measures. This study confirmed the hypothesis regarding internal and external intensity but not regarding wellness.
尽管目前已有关于女子足球比赛强度的数据,但有关训练的知识仍然匮乏。因此,本研究的目的是量化2019/20赛季职业女足运动员典型微周期的外部(运动活动)和内部(心理生理)强度,以及健康状况。来自一支葡萄牙精英女子足球队的10名球员(24.6±2.3岁)参与了本研究。在2019 - 2020赛季期间,收集了87次训练课和15场比赛的所有变量进行分析。记录了诸如总距离、高速奔跑、加速、减速和球员负荷等全球定位变量作为强度指标,同时记录了主观用力程度分级(RPE)和训练课RPE作为内部指标。收集了霍珀指数(HI)作为健康参数。结果表明,与一周中的训练相比(比赛日减去[MD-]、MD-5、MD-4、MD-2),比赛中的内部和外部强度指标更大,p < 0.05,效应量非常大(ES)。同样,在一周开始时发现内部和外部强度值较高,而在MD-2时发现最低值(p < 0.05,效应量非常大)。关于健康状况,训练日和比赛日之间的HI参数没有显著差异(p > 0.05)。本研究证实了比赛日期间强度值最高,而在比赛日前的训练课(MD-2)强度最低。此外,在训练周开始时发现训练强度较高,随着比赛日临近强度降低。与强度指标相比,健康参数没有变化。本研究证实了关于内部和外部强度的假设,但未证实关于健康状况的假设。