• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器学习应用于髋关节修复手术术前风险评估的实施。

Implementation of a machine learning application in preoperative risk assessment for hip repair surgery.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.

Department of Medical Research, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Apr 23;22(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01648-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12871-022-01648-y
PMID:35459103
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9034633/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aims to develop a machine learning-based application in a real-world medical domain to assist anesthesiologists in assessing the risk of complications in patients after a hip surgery.

METHODS

Data from adult patients who underwent hip repair surgery at Chi-Mei Medical Center and its 2 branch hospitals from January 1, 2013, to March 31, 2020, were analyzed. Patients with incomplete data were excluded. A total of 22 features were included in the algorithms, including demographics, comorbidities, and major preoperative laboratory data from the database. The primary outcome was a composite of adverse events (in-hospital mortality, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, respiratory, hepatic and renal failure, and sepsis). Secondary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) admission and prolonged length of stay (PLOS). The data obtained were imported into 7 machine learning algorithms to predict the risk of adverse outcomes. Seventy percent of the data were randomly selected for training, leaving 30% for testing. The performances of the models were evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The optimal algorithm with the highest AUROC was used to build a web-based application, then integrated into the hospital information system (HIS) for clinical use.

RESULTS

Data from 4,448 patients were analyzed; 102 (2.3%), 160 (3.6%), and 401 (9.0%) patients had primary composite adverse outcomes, ICU admission, and PLOS, respectively. Our optimal model had a superior performance (AUROC by DeLong test) than that of ASA-PS in predicting the primary composite outcomes (0.810 vs. 0.629, p < 0.01), ICU admission (0.835 vs. 0.692, p < 0.01), and PLOS (0.832 vs. 0.618, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The hospital-specific machine learning model outperformed the ASA-PS in risk assessment. This web-based application gained high satisfaction from anesthesiologists after online use.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在开发一个基于机器学习的应用程序,应用于真实的医学领域,以帮助麻醉师评估髋关节手术后患者发生并发症的风险。

方法

分析了 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 3 月 31 日期间在奇美医疗中心及其 2 家分院接受髋关节修复手术的成年患者的数据。排除数据不完整的患者。算法共纳入 22 个特征,包括数据库中的人口统计学、合并症和主要术前实验室数据。主要结局是不良事件的综合指标(院内死亡率、急性心肌梗死、中风、呼吸、肝和肾功能衰竭以及败血症)。次要结局为重症监护病房(ICU)入住和住院时间延长(PLOS)。将获得的数据导入 7 种机器学习算法中,以预测不良结局的风险。将 70%的数据随机抽取用于训练,30%的数据用于测试。通过接收者操作特征曲线下的面积(AUROC)评估模型的性能。使用具有最高 AUROC 的最佳算法构建基于网络的应用程序,然后将其集成到医院信息系统(HIS)中用于临床使用。

结果

分析了 4448 例患者的数据;102 例(2.3%)、160 例(3.6%)和 401 例(9.0%)患者分别发生了主要复合不良结局、入住 ICU 和 PLOS。我们的最佳模型在预测主要复合结局(DeLong 检验的 AUROC 0.810 与 0.629,p<0.01)、入住 ICU(0.835 与 0.692,p<0.01)和 PLOS(0.832 与 0.618,p<0.01)方面的表现均优于 ASA-PS。

结论

医院特定的机器学习模型在风险评估方面优于 ASA-PS。该基于网络的应用程序在在线使用后得到了麻醉师的高度满意度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88e8/9034633/64c89d9c19aa/12871_2022_1648_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88e8/9034633/07ca4b1f66b7/12871_2022_1648_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88e8/9034633/89cea847675d/12871_2022_1648_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88e8/9034633/64c89d9c19aa/12871_2022_1648_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88e8/9034633/07ca4b1f66b7/12871_2022_1648_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88e8/9034633/89cea847675d/12871_2022_1648_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88e8/9034633/64c89d9c19aa/12871_2022_1648_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementation of a machine learning application in preoperative risk assessment for hip repair surgery.机器学习应用于髋关节修复手术术前风险评估的实施。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Apr 23;22(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01648-y.
2
Utilizing Machine Learning Methods for Preoperative Prediction of Postsurgical Mortality and Intensive Care Unit Admission.利用机器学习方法预测术后死亡率和入住重症监护病房。
Ann Surg. 2020 Dec;272(6):1133-1139. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003297.
3
[Predicting prolonged length of intensive care unit stay machine learning].[预测重症监护病房长期住院时间 机器学习]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2021 Dec 18;53(6):1163-1170. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.06.026.
4
Dynamic and explainable machine learning prediction of mortality in patients in the intensive care unit: a retrospective study of high-frequency data in electronic patient records.动态可解释机器学习预测 ICU 患者死亡率:电子患者记录中高频数据的回顾性研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Apr;2(4):e179-e191. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30018-2. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
5
Novel Preoperative Risk Stratification Using Digital Phenotyping Applying a Scalable Machine-Learning Approach.使用数字表型和可扩展机器学习方法进行新型术前风险分层
Anesth Analg. 2024 Jul 1;139(1):174-185. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006753. Epub 2023 Dec 5.
6
Hospital Length of Stay and 30-Day Mortality Prediction in Stroke: A Machine Learning Analysis of 17,000 ICU Admissions in Brazil.医院住院时间和 30 天死亡率预测:巴西 17000 例 ICU 入院患者的机器学习分析。
Neurocrit Care. 2022 Aug;37(Suppl 2):313-321. doi: 10.1007/s12028-022-01486-3. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
7
Early hospital mortality prediction of intensive care unit patients using an ensemble learning approach.基于集成学习方法的重症监护病房患者早期住院病死率预测。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Dec;108:185-195. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
8
Precision medicine for traumatic cervical spinal cord injuries: accessible and interpretable machine learning models to predict individualized in-hospital outcomes.创伤性颈脊髓损伤的精准医学:可及且可解释的机器学习模型,用于预测个体化的院内结局。
Spine J. 2023 Dec;23(12):1750-1763. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.08.009. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
9
Using machine learning methods to predict in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients in the ICU.使用机器学习方法预测 ICU 中脓毒症患者的院内死亡率。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Oct 2;20(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01271-2.
10
Predictors of 30-Day Mortality Among Dutch Patients Undergoing Colorectal Cancer Surgery, 2011-2016.2011-2016 年荷兰结直肠癌手术患者 30 天死亡率的预测因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e217737. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.7737.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting postoperative trauma-induced coagulopathy in patients with severe injuries by machine learning.通过机器学习预测重伤患者术后创伤性凝血病
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 25;15(1):27072. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13283-x.
2
Implementation and Updating of Clinical Prediction Models: A Systematic Review.临床预测模型的实施与更新:一项系统综述
Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2025 May 23;3(3):100228. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpdig.2025.100228. eCollection 2025 Sep.
3
Naïve Bayes is an interpretable and predictive machine learning algorithm in predicting osteoporotic hip fracture in-hospital mortality compared to other machine learning algorithms.

本文引用的文献

1
Real-time AI prediction for major adverse cardiac events in emergency department patients with chest pain.实时人工智能预测急诊科胸痛患者的主要不良心脏事件。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 Sep 11;28(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00786-x.
2
The value of the "Surgical Risk Preoperative Assessment System" (SURPAS) in preoperative consultation for elective surgery: a pilot study.“手术风险术前评估系统”(SURPAS)在择期手术术前会诊中的价值:一项试点研究。
Patient Saf Surg. 2020 Jul 25;14:31. doi: 10.1186/s13037-020-00256-4. eCollection 2020.
3
Is the ACS-NSQIP Risk Calculator Accurate in Predicting Adverse Postoperative Outcomes in the Emergency Setting? An Italian Single-center Preliminary Study.
与其他机器学习算法相比,朴素贝叶斯是一种可解释且具有预测性的机器学习算法,用于预测骨质疏松性髋部骨折患者的院内死亡率。
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Jan 2;4(1):e0000529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000529. eCollection 2025 Jan.
4
The anesthesiologist's guide to critically assessing machine learning research: a narrative review.麻醉医生批判性评估机器学习研究指南:一篇叙述性综述
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):452. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02840-y.
5
Automation in Contemporary Clinical Information Systems: a Survey of AI in Healthcare Settings.当代临床信息系统中的自动化:医疗环境中的人工智能调查。
Yearb Med Inform. 2023 Aug;32(1):115-126. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1768733. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
6
[Application and prospect of machine learning in orthopaedic trauma].[机器学习在骨科创伤中的应用与前景]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Dec 15;37(12):1562-1568. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202308064.
7
Implementing a Novel Machine Learning System for Nutrition Education in Diabetes Mellitus Nutritional Clinic: Predicting 1-Year Blood Glucose Control.在糖尿病营养诊所实施用于营养教育的新型机器学习系统:预测1年血糖控制情况
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Sep 28;10(10):1139. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10101139.
8
Using artificial intelligence to predict adverse outcomes in emergency department patients with hyperglycemic crises in real time.利用人工智能实时预测急诊科高血糖危象患者的不良结局。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2023 Oct 24;23(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s12902-023-01437-9.
9
A Comprehensive Analysis and Review of Artificial Intelligence in Anaesthesia.麻醉学中人工智能的综合分析与综述
Cureus. 2023 Sep 11;15(9):e45038. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45038. eCollection 2023 Sep.
10
Enabling personalized perioperative risk prediction by using a machine-learning model based on preoperative data.基于术前数据的机器学习模型实现围手术期个体化风险预测。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 2;13(1):7128. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33981-8.
ACS-NSQIP 风险计算器在预测急诊术后不良结局方面的准确性如何?一项意大利单中心初步研究。
World J Surg. 2020 Nov;44(11):3710-3719. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05705-w. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
4
Artificial Neural Network and Cox Regression Models for Predicting Mortality after Hip Fracture Surgery: A Population-Based Comparison.人工神经网络和 Cox 回归模型预测髋部骨折手术后的死亡率:基于人群的比较。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 May 19;56(5):243. doi: 10.3390/medicina56050243.
5
Osteoporotic hip fracture prediction from risk factors available in administrative claims data - A machine learning approach.从行政索赔数据中可用的风险因素预测骨质疏松性髋部骨折-一种机器学习方法。
PLoS One. 2020 May 19;15(5):e0232969. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232969. eCollection 2020.
6
A novel machine learning algorithm, Bayesian networks model, to predict the high-risk patients with cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury.一种新的机器学习算法,贝叶斯网络模型,用于预测心脏手术相关急性肾损伤的高危患者。
Clin Cardiol. 2020 Jul;43(7):752-761. doi: 10.1002/clc.23377. Epub 2020 May 12.
7
Preoperative Evaluation of the Frail Patient.虚弱患者的术前评估。
Anesth Analg. 2020 Jun;130(6):1493-1503. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004735.
8
How Accurate Are the Surgical Risk Preoperative Assessment System (SURPAS) Universal Calculators in Total Joint Arthroplasty?全膝关节置换术中外科风险术前评估系统(SURPAS)通用计算器的准确性如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Feb;478(2):241-251. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001078.
9
Comorbidity as the dominant predictor of mortality after hip fracture surgeries.合并症是髋部骨折手术后死亡率的主要预测因素。
Osteoporos Int. 2019 Dec;30(12):2477-2483. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05139-8. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
10
Application of a deep learning algorithm for detection and visualization of hip fractures on plain pelvic radiographs.深度学习算法在骨盆平片上髋部骨折检测和可视化中的应用。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Oct;29(10):5469-5477. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06167-y. Epub 2019 Apr 1.