• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国各县投票限制与 COVID-19 病例和死亡率之间的关系。

The relationship between voting restrictions and COVID-19 case and mortality rates between US counties.

机构信息

University of Alberta School of Public Health, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Health Professions Department, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Jun 1;17(6):e0267738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267738. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0267738
PMID:35648741
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9159582/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since the 2010 election, the number of laws in the U.S. that create barriers to voting has increased dramatically. These laws may have spillover effects on population health by creating a disconnect between voter preferences and political representation, thereby limiting protective public health policies and funding. We examine whether voting restrictions are associated with county-level COVID-19 case and mortality rates.

METHODS

To obtain information on restricted access to voting, we used the Cost of Voting Index (COVI), a state-level measure of barriers to voting during a U.S. election from 1996 to 2016. COVID-19 case and mortality rates were obtained from the New York Times' GitHub database (a compilation from multiple academic sources). Multilevel modeling was used to determine whether restrictive voting laws were associated with county-level COVID-19 case and mortality rates after controlling for county-level characteristics from the County Health Rankings. We tested whether associations were heterogeneous across racial and socioeconomic groups.

RESULTS

A significant association was observed between increasing voting restrictions and COVID-19 case (ß = 580.5, 95% CI = 3.9, 1157.2) and mortality rates (ß = 16.5, 95% CI = 0.33,32.6) when confounders were included.

CONCLUSIONS

Restrictive voting laws were associated with higher COVID-19 case and mortality rates.

摘要

背景

自 2010 年选举以来,美国制定了大量增加投票障碍的法律。这些法律可能会通过选民偏好与政治代表之间的脱节产生溢出效应,从而限制保护公众健康的政策和资金。我们研究了投票限制是否与县一级的 COVID-19 病例和死亡率有关。

方法

为了获取有关投票限制的信息,我们使用了投票成本指数(COVI),这是 1996 年至 2016 年美国选举期间衡量投票障碍的州一级指标。COVID-19 的病例和死亡率来自纽约时报的 GitHub 数据库(来自多个学术来源的汇编)。多水平模型用于确定在控制县健康排名中的县一级特征后,限制投票的法律与县一级的 COVID-19 病例和死亡率之间是否存在关联。我们测试了关联是否在种族和社会经济群体之间存在异质性。

结果

当包括混杂因素时,投票限制的增加与 COVID-19 病例(β=580.5,95%置信区间=3.9,1157.2)和死亡率(β=16.5,95%置信区间=0.33,32.6)之间存在显著关联。

结论

限制投票的法律与更高的 COVID-19 病例和死亡率有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d98d/9159582/351cbbd2185c/pone.0267738.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d98d/9159582/23a55167e1c2/pone.0267738.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d98d/9159582/351cbbd2185c/pone.0267738.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d98d/9159582/23a55167e1c2/pone.0267738.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d98d/9159582/351cbbd2185c/pone.0267738.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The relationship between voting restrictions and COVID-19 case and mortality rates between US counties.美国各县投票限制与 COVID-19 病例和死亡率之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 1;17(6):e0267738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267738. eCollection 2022.
2
Voting restrictions associated with health inequities in teenage birth rates.与青少年生育率不平等相关的投票限制。
Public Health. 2023 May;218:121-127. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2023.02.022. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
3
County-level association of COVID-19 mortality with 2020 United States presidential voting.县一级的 COVID-19 死亡率与 2020 年美国总统选举的关联。
Public Health. 2021 Sep;198:114-117. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.06.011. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
4
Barriers to Voting and Access to Health Insurance Among US Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.美国成年人投票及获得医疗保险的障碍:一项横断面研究。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2021 Jul 30;2:100026. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2021.100026. eCollection 2021 Oct.
5
COVID-19 Infections and Mortality in Florida Counties: Roles of Race, Ethnicity, Segregation, and 2020 Election Results.佛罗里达州各县的 COVID-19 感染和死亡率:种族、族裔、隔离以及 2020 年选举结果的作用。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022 Oct;9(5):1965-1975. doi: 10.1007/s40615-021-01135-z. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
6
Associations of presidential voting preference and gubernatorial control with county-level COVID-19 case and death rates in the continental United States.在美国大陆,总统选举偏好和州长控制与县级 COVID-19 病例和死亡率的关联。
Public Health. 2021 Sep;198:161-163. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.07.038. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
7
Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.迈向政治发展科学。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2019 Sep;84(3):7-185. doi: 10.1111/mono.12410.
8
The Association of COVID-19 Infection and Vaccination Rates in Florida.佛罗里达州的 COVID-19 感染率和疫苗接种率关联。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2022;28(4):E676-E684. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001509. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
9
Emergency Absentee Voting for Hospitalized Patients and Voting During COVID-19: A 50-State Study.紧急情况下为住院患者提供缺席投票和在 COVID-19 期间投票:一项 50 个州的研究。
West J Emerg Med. 2021 Jul 15;22(4):1000-1009. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.4.50884.
10
Assessment of Structural Barriers and Racial Group Disparities of COVID-19 Mortality With Spatial Analysis.利用空间分析评估 COVID-19 死亡率的结构性障碍和种族群体差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e220984. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0984.

引用本文的文献

1
Using spatial Bayesian models to estimate associations between structural racial discrimination and disparities in severe maternal morbidity.使用空间贝叶斯模型来估计结构性种族歧视与严重孕产妇发病率差异之间的关联。
Soc Sci Med. 2025 Apr;371:117932. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117932. Epub 2025 Mar 7.
2
Hurricanes and Health Equity: A Review of Structural Determinants of Vulnerability for Climate and Health Research.飓风与健康公平:气候与健康研究中脆弱性的结构决定因素综述
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2025 Feb 1;12(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s40572-025-00475-w.
3
Voting Restrictions and Increased Odds of Adverse Birth Outcomes in the US.

本文引用的文献

1
Barriers to Voting and Access to Health Insurance Among US Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.美国成年人投票及获得医疗保险的障碍:一项横断面研究。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2021 Jul 30;2:100026. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2021.100026. eCollection 2021 Oct.
2
Political polarization on COVID-19 pandemic response in the United States.美国在应对新冠疫情方面的政治两极分化。
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Sep;179:110892. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.110892. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
3
Work-related and personal predictors of COVID-19 transmission: evidence from the UK and USA.
美国的投票限制与不良出生结局几率的增加
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Dec 6. doi: 10.1007/s40615-024-02253-0.
4
Expanding voter registration to clinical settings to improve health equity.将选民登记扩展至临床环境以改善健康公平性。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct;58(5):970-975. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14218. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
工作相关和个人因素对 COVID-19 传播的影响:来自英国和美国的证据。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2022 Feb;76(2):152-157. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-215208. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
4
The Impact of COVID-19 Management Policies Tailored to Airborne SARS-CoV-2 Transmission: Policy Analysis.《基于 SARS-CoV-2 空气传播的新冠管理政策的影响:政策分析》。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Apr 21;7(4):e20699. doi: 10.2196/20699.
5
A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker).一个全球性的大流行病政策面板数据库(牛津 COVID-19 政府应对追踪器)。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Apr;5(4):529-538. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01079-8. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
6
Association of Social and Economic Inequality With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Incidence and Mortality Across US Counties.社会经济不平等与美国各县 2019 冠状病毒病发病率和死亡率的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2034578. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.34578.
7
Social inequality and the syndemic of chronic disease and COVID-19: county-level analysis in the USA.社会不平等与慢性病和新冠疫情的综合征:美国县级分析
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2021 Jan 5. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-215626.
8
Risk factors for severe and critically ill COVID-19 patients: A review.COVID-19 患者重症和危重症的危险因素:综述。
Allergy. 2021 Feb;76(2):428-455. doi: 10.1111/all.14657. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
9
Partisan differences in physical distancing are linked to health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic.党派之间在保持社交距离方面的分歧与 COVID-19 大流行期间的健康结果有关。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Nov;4(11):1186-1197. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-00977-7. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
10
Pandemic Politics: Timing State-Level Social Distancing Responses to COVID-19.大流行政治:新冠疫情时期的州级社会隔离应对措施的时机选择。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2021 Apr 1;46(2):211-233. doi: 10.1215/03616878-8802162.