School of Population Health, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, 43606, USA.
Department of Psychology, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, Ontario, M5B 2K3, Canada.
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jul;305:115031. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115031. Epub 2022 May 13.
The COVID19 pandemic has caused a mental health crisis worldwide, which may have different age-specific impacts, partly due to age-related differences in resilience and coping. The purposes of this study were to 1) identify disparities in mental distress, perceived adversities, resilience, and coping during the COVID-19 pandemic among four age groups (18-34, 35-49, 50-64, and ≥65); 2) assess the age-moderated time effect on mental distress, and 3) estimate the effects of perceived adversities on mental distress as moderated by age, resilience and coping.
Data were drawn from a longitudinal survey of a nationally representative sample (n = 7830) administered during the pandemic. Weighted mean of mental distress and adversities (perceived loneliness, perceived stress, and perceived risk), resilience, and coping were compared among different age groups. Hierarchical random-effects models were used to assess the moderated effects of adversities on mental distress.
The youngest age group (18-34) reported the highest mental distress at baseline with the mean (standard error) as 2.70 (0.12), which showed an incremental improvement with age (2.27 (0.10), 1.88 (0.08), 1.29 (0.07) for 35-49, 50-64, and ≥65 groups respectively). The older age groups reported lower levels of loneliness and perceived stress, higher perceived risk, greater resilience, and more relaxation coping (ps < .001). Model results showed that mental distress declined slightly over time, and the downward trend was moderated by age group. Perceived adversities, alcohol, and social coping were positively,whereas resilience and relaxation were negatively associated with mental distress. Resilience and age group moderated the slope of each adversity on mental distress.
The youngest age group appeared to be most vulnerable during the pandemic. Mental health interventions may provide resilience training to combat everyday adversities for the vulnerable individuals and empower them to achieve personal growth that challenges age boundaries.
COVID19 大流行在全球范围内引发了一场心理健康危机,这可能因年龄相关的恢复力和应对能力差异而产生不同的特定年龄影响。本研究的目的是:1)确定四个年龄组(18-34、35-49、50-64 和≥65 岁)在 COVID-19 大流行期间在精神困扰、感知逆境、恢复力和应对方面的差异;2)评估年龄对精神困扰的时间调节作用;3)估计感知逆境对精神困扰的影响,同时考虑年龄、恢复力和应对的调节作用。
数据来自大流行期间进行的一项全国代表性样本(n=7830)的纵向调查。在不同年龄组之间比较了精神困扰和逆境(感知孤独、感知压力和感知风险)、恢复力和应对的加权平均值。使用分层随机效应模型评估逆境对精神困扰的调节作用。
最年轻的年龄组(18-34 岁)在基线时报告的精神困扰最高,平均值(标准误差)为 2.70(0.12),随着年龄的增长呈递增趋势(35-49 岁、50-64 岁和≥65 岁组分别为 2.27(0.10)、1.88(0.08)和 1.29(0.07))。年龄较大的组报告的孤独感和感知压力较低,感知风险较高,恢复力和放松应对较高(p<0.001)。模型结果表明,精神困扰随时间略有下降,下降趋势受年龄组调节。感知逆境、酒精和社交应对与精神困扰呈正相关,而恢复力和放松应对与精神困扰呈负相关。恢复力和年龄组调节了每种逆境对精神困扰的斜率。
最年轻的年龄组在大流行期间似乎最脆弱。心理健康干预措施可以为弱势群体提供恢复力培训,以应对日常逆境,增强他们实现个人成长的能力,挑战年龄界限。