• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Prevalence, Directionality, and Dyadic Perpetration Types of Intimate Partner Violence in a Community Sample in Portugal: a Gender-Inclusive Inquiry.葡萄牙社区样本中亲密伴侣暴力的患病率、方向性及二元犯罪类型:一项性别包容性调查
Eur J Crim Pol Res. 2022 Jun 6:1-18. doi: 10.1007/s10610-022-09514-w.
2
Sociodemographic Differences in Intimate Partner Violence Prevalence, Chronicity, and Severity Among Young Sexual and Gender Minorities Assigned Male at Birth: The P18 Cohort Study.出生时被指定为男性的年轻性少数群体和性别少数群体中亲密伴侣暴力的流行率、持续性和严重程度的社会人口学差异:P18 队列研究。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Sep;37(17-18):NP16476-NP16508. doi: 10.1177/08862605211021985. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
3
Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization--national intimate partner and sexual violence survey, United States, 2011.性暴力、跟踪和亲密伴侣暴力受害的流行率和特征——2011 年美国全国亲密伴侣和性暴力调查。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014 Sep 5;63(8):1-18.
4
Examining the Prevalence, Bidirectionality, and Co-Occurrence of Sexual Intimate Partner Violence among Women During Pregnancy and Postpartum.调查孕期及产后女性中性亲密伴侣暴力的患病率、双向性及共现情况。
Partner Abuse. 2014 Oct;5(4):407-419. doi: 10.1891/1946-6560.5.4.407.
5
Women's and men's reports of past-year prevalence of intimate partner violence and rape and women's risk factors for intimate partner violence: A multicountry cross-sectional study in Asia and the Pacific.关于过去一年亲密伴侣暴力和强奸的女性及男性报告以及女性亲密伴侣暴力的风险因素:一项在亚洲及太平洋地区开展的多国横断面研究。
PLoS Med. 2017 Sep 5;14(9):e1002381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002381. eCollection 2017 Sep.
6
Associations Between Alcohol Use and Intimate Partner Violence Among Men Who Have Sex with Men.男性同性性行为者的饮酒行为与亲密伴侣暴力之间的关联。
LGBT Health. 2016 Dec;3(6):400-406. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2016.0057.
7
Perpetration and Victimization of Intimate Partner Violence Among Young Men and Women in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆地区青年男女中亲密伴侣暴力的实施与受害情况。
J Interpers Violence. 2018 Aug;33(16):2486-2511. doi: 10.1177/0886260515625910. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
8
Prevalence and Risk Factors of Women's Past-Year Physical IPV Perpetration and Victimization in Tanzania.坦桑尼亚女性过去一年身体暴力的实施及受害情况的患病率和风险因素
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Feb;36(3-4):1141-1167. doi: 10.1177/0886260517738775. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
9
Intimate partner violence, depression, and sexual behaviour among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in the PROUD trial.在 PROUD 试验中,男同性恋、双性恋和其他与男性发生性关系的男性中的亲密伴侣暴力、抑郁和性行为。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Apr 25;19(1):431. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6757-6.
10
Prevalence and risk factors of physical or sexual intimate violence perpetration amongst men in four districts in the central region of Ghana: Baseline findings from a cluster randomised controlled trial.加纳中部四个地区男性中身体或性亲密暴力实施的流行率和风险因素:一项整群随机对照试验的基线结果。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 9;13(3):e0191663. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191663. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Dating Violence Questionnaire for Victimization and Perpetration (DVQ-VP) in Ecuadorian population.厄瓜多尔人群中受害与施害约会暴力问卷(DVQ-VP)的心理测量特性。
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2025 Aug 21;38(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s41155-025-00359-w.
2
How to Evaluate Reports of Intimate Partner Violence? Examining Interpartner Agreement in a Forensic Sample of Different-Sex Couples Where Men are Accused of Intimate Partner Violence.如何评估亲密伴侣暴力报告?在男性被指控亲密伴侣暴力的不同性别伴侣的法医样本中检验伴侣间的一致性。
J Interpers Violence. 2025 Feb;40(3-4):537-563. doi: 10.1177/08862605241249740. Epub 2024 May 10.
3
Interpartner Agreement on Intimate Partner Violence Reports: Evidence From a Community Sample of Different-Sex Couples.亲密伴侣暴力报告中的伴侣间协议:来自不同性别伴侣社区样本的证据。
Assessment. 2024 Jul;31(5):980-993. doi: 10.1177/10731911231196483. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
4
Perpetration of Intimate Partner Violence and COVID-19-Related Anxiety During the Second Lockdown in Portugal: The Mediating Role of Anxiety, Depression, and Stress.葡萄牙第二次封锁期间亲密伴侣暴力行为与新冠疫情相关焦虑:焦虑、抑郁和压力的中介作用
J Fam Violence. 2023 Jan 24:1-12. doi: 10.1007/s10896-023-00498-7.

本文引用的文献

1
An increasing risk of family violence during the Covid-19 pandemic: Strengthening community collaborations to save lives.新冠疫情期间家庭暴力风险上升:加强社区合作以拯救生命。
Forensic Sci Int Rep. 2020 Dec;2:100089. doi: 10.1016/j.fsir.2020.100089. Epub 2020 Apr 12.
2
Intimate Partner Violence Reports During the COVID-19 Pandemic First Year in Portuguese Urban Areas: A Brief Report.葡萄牙城市地区新冠疫情第一年期间的亲密伴侣暴力报告:简要报告
J Fam Violence. 2022;37(6):871-880. doi: 10.1007/s10896-021-00332-y. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
3
Prevalence of intimate partner violence against women in the Arab world: a systematic review.阿拉伯世界针对妇女的亲密伴侣暴力的流行率:系统评价。
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2019 Oct 22;19(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12914-019-0215-5.
4
Prevalence of intimate partner violence against women in Sweden and Spain: A psychometric study of the 'Nordic paradox'.瑞典和西班牙针对妇女的亲密伴侣暴力的流行率:“北欧悖论”的心理测量研究。
PLoS One. 2019 May 16;14(5):e0217015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217015. eCollection 2019.
5
Intimate partner violence in the Americas: a systematic review and reanalysis of national prevalence estimates.美洲的亲密伴侣暴力行为:对国家患病率估计值的系统评价与重新分析
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2019 Mar 20;43:e26. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2019.26. eCollection 2019.
6
Intimate Partner Violence.亲密伴侣暴力
N Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 28;380(9):850-857. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1807166.
7
Intimate partner violence against young women: prevalence and associated factors in Europe.亲密伴侣暴力侵害年轻女性:欧洲的流行情况和相关因素。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018 Jul;72(7):611-616. doi: 10.1136/jech-2017-209701. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
8
Intimate partner violence: a study in men and women from six European countries.亲密伴侣暴力:对来自六个欧洲国家的男性和女性的一项研究。
Int J Public Health. 2015 May;60(4):467-78. doi: 10.1007/s00038-015-0663-1. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
9
Child abuse and neglect and intimate partner violence victimization and perpetration: a prospective investigation.儿童虐待与忽视以及亲密伴侣暴力的受害与施害情况:一项前瞻性调查
Child Abuse Negl. 2014 Apr;38(4):650-63. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.11.004. Epub 2013 Dec 9.
10
The global prevalence of intimate partner homicide: a systematic review.全球亲密伴侣杀人事件的普遍性:一项系统性综述。
Lancet. 2013 Sep 7;382(9895):859-65. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61030-2. Epub 2013 Jun 20.

葡萄牙社区样本中亲密伴侣暴力的患病率、方向性及二元犯罪类型:一项性别包容性调查

The Prevalence, Directionality, and Dyadic Perpetration Types of Intimate Partner Violence in a Community Sample in Portugal: a Gender-Inclusive Inquiry.

作者信息

Capinha Marta, Rijo Daniel, Pereira Marco, Matos Marlene

机构信息

University of Coimbra, Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive Behavioral Intervention, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra, Rua Do Colégio Novo, 3000-115 Coimbra, Portugal.

University of Minho, Psychology Research Center, School of Psychology, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.

出版信息

Eur J Crim Pol Res. 2022 Jun 6:1-18. doi: 10.1007/s10610-022-09514-w.

DOI:10.1007/s10610-022-09514-w
PMID:35692937
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9170125/
Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a major concern across the world, and its prevalence assessment has been a priority in numerous countries. However, data about IPV prevalence in Portugal is scarce and not up-to-date. This study aims to estimate IPV prevalence in Portugal. A community sample of 1392 adults (77.4% female, mean age = 34.95 years,  = 12.80) was collected through a web-based survey, between March and June of 2020. Participants completed a sociodemographic questionnaire and the (CTS-2). Accounting for all forms of IPV, a past-year prevalence of 64.4% and 64.6% were found, for victimization and perpetration, respectively. Regarding gender or sexual orientation, no significant differences were found in the past-year or the lifetime prevalence, neither concerning frequency. Directionality and dyadic concordance types were analyzed and showed that most violence was bidirectional. Having perpetrated violence in previous intimate relationships was the most influential factor when predicting past-year perpetration or victimization. Other significant predictors were age, being victimized before 15 years old, cohabitation with the intimate partner, and drug use, but the last two were only significant for victimization. Findings support the idea that IPV is a relevant phenomenon, regardless of gender and sexual orientation. It is the first nationwide, gender-inclusive study to do so in Portugal. Studies based on different samples might provide important evidence to prevent hasty conclusions about IPV prevalence and patterns and to guide empirically driven policies.

摘要

亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)是全球主要关注的问题,其患病率评估在许多国家一直是优先事项。然而,葡萄牙关于IPV患病率的数据稀缺且不及时。本研究旨在估计葡萄牙的IPV患病率。2020年3月至6月期间,通过网络调查收集了1392名成年人的社区样本(女性占77.4%,平均年龄 = 34.95岁,标准差 = 12.80)。参与者完成了一份社会人口统计学问卷和冲突策略量表(CTS-2)。考虑到所有形式的IPV,过去一年中,受害者和施暴者的患病率分别为64.4%和64.6%。在性别或性取向方面,过去一年或一生患病率以及频率方面均未发现显著差异。对方向性和二元一致性类型进行了分析,结果表明大多数暴力是双向的。在预测过去一年的施暴或受害情况时,在之前的亲密关系中实施过暴力是最具影响力的因素。其他显著的预测因素包括年龄、15岁之前曾是受害者、与亲密伴侣同居以及吸毒,但后两者仅对受害情况有显著影响。研究结果支持这样一种观点,即无论性别和性取向如何,IPV都是一个相关现象。这是葡萄牙第一项全国性的、包含性别的此类研究。基于不同样本的研究可能会提供重要证据,以防止对IPV患病率和模式得出草率结论,并指导基于实证的政策。