Suppr超能文献

评估和报告饮食模式方法的系统评价

A Systematic Review of the Methods Used to Assess and Report Dietary Patterns.

作者信息

Wingrove Kate, Lawrence Mark A, McNaughton Sarah A

机构信息

Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Front Nutr. 2022 May 25;9:892351. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.892351. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

The use of dietary pattern assessment methods has increased over time. However, data from individual studies can be difficult to compare and synthesize when the dietary pattern assessment methods, and the dietary patterns that are identified are not described sufficiently. The aims of this systematic review were to analyze the application and reporting of dietary pattern assessment methods, and the reporting of the dietary patterns that were analyzed with health outcomes. Three electronic databases were searched (Medline, Embase, and Global Health). Cohort and nested case control studies published in English between January 1980 and March 2019 that examined associations between dietary patterns and health outcomes (including cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes and metabolic syndrome, and body weight) in apparently healthy, community dwelling adults (aged over 18 years) or children (aged 2-18 years) were eligible for inclusion. A narrative synthesis was conducted and descriptive statistics were used to summarize the application and reporting of each dietary pattern assessment method, and the reporting of the identified dietary patterns. Analysis of associations between dietary patterns and health outcomes was beyond the scope of this review. Of the included studies = 410), 62.7% used index-based methods, 30.5% used factor analysis or principal component analysis, 6.3% used reduced rank regression, and 5.6% used cluster analysis. Some studies (4.6%) used more than one method. There was considerable variation in the application and reporting of dietary pattern assessment methods. For example, the application of Mediterranean diet indices varied in terms of the nature of dietary components (foods only or foods and nutrients) and the rationale behind the cut-off points (absolute and/or data driven). In some cases, important methodological details were omitted. The level of detail used to describe the dietary patterns also varied, and food and nutrient profiles were often not reported. To ensure dietary patterns evidence can be synthesized and translated into dietary guidelines, standardized approaches for the application and reporting of dietary pattern assessment methods and the reporting of the identified dietary patterns would be beneficial.

摘要

随着时间的推移,膳食模式评估方法的使用有所增加。然而,当膳食模式评估方法以及所确定的膳食模式没有得到充分描述时,来自个别研究的数据可能难以比较和综合。本系统评价的目的是分析膳食模式评估方法的应用和报告情况,以及所分析的膳食模式与健康结果的报告情况。检索了三个电子数据库(Medline、Embase和全球健康数据库)。1980年1月至2019年3月期间以英文发表的队列研究和巢式病例对照研究符合纳入标准,这些研究调查了明显健康的社区居住成年人(18岁以上)或儿童(2 - 18岁)的膳食模式与健康结果(包括心血管疾病、癌症、糖尿病和代谢综合征以及体重)之间的关联。进行了叙述性综合分析,并使用描述性统计来总结每种膳食模式评估方法的应用和报告情况,以及所确定膳食模式的报告情况。膳食模式与健康结果之间关联的分析超出了本综述的范围。在所纳入的研究中(n = 410),62.7%使用基于指数的方法,30.5%使用因子分析或主成分分析,6.3%使用降秩回归,5.6%使用聚类分析。一些研究(4.6%)使用了不止一种方法。膳食模式评估方法的应用和报告存在相当大的差异。例如,地中海饮食指数的应用在膳食成分的性质(仅食物或食物和营养素)以及切点背后的原理(绝对的和/或数据驱动的)方面有所不同。在某些情况下,重要的方法学细节被省略了。用于描述膳食模式的详细程度也各不相同,食物和营养素概况往往未被报告。为确保膳食模式证据能够被综合并转化为膳食指南,采用标准化的方法来应用和报告膳食模式评估方法以及报告所确定的膳食模式将是有益的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/921f/9175067/5c3bac38b7b0/fnut-09-892351-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验