Casarotta Erika, Bottari Elisa, Vannicola Sara, Giorgetti Rachele, Domizi Roberta, Carsetti Andrea, Damiani Elisa, Scorcella Claudia, Gabbanelli Vincenzo, Pantanetti Simona, Marini Benedetto, Donati Abele, Adrario Erica
Department of Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "Ospedali Riuniti", Ancona, Italy.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 3;9:910031. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.910031. eCollection 2022.
In COVID-19 patients on mechanical ventilation, VAP from remains a crucial risk factor for death. Antibiotic resistance represents an important problem in treating this infection. This study aims to describe the evolution of the superinfection from in patients with acute respiratory failure from SARS-CoV-2 infection admitted to ICU and compare the impact of two different antibiotic strategies on microbiological negativization.
ingle-center observational retrospective study, including patients admitted to our ICU from March 2020 to May 2021 for acute respiratory failure from SARS-CoV-2 infection who developed superinfection. Clinical data at ICU admission were collected, as well as the timing of isolation of , its resistance profile, the site of infection, and the antibiotic therapy.
Of the 32 patients enrolled, 10 patients (31.2%) were treated with the combination of high-dose ampicillin/sulbactam, high-dose tigecycline, intravenous and inhaled colistin , the other 22 (68.8%) were treated with the combination of two antibiotics . Of the 10 patients in the group, 8 patients (80%) received also fosfomycin. All patients (100%) in the group had microbiological negativization, while in the group microbiological negativization was observed in 8 (36.4%) patients, < 0.01.
Our report shows microbiological negativization in all patients treated with the combination therapy of nebulized and intravenous colistin, high-dose tigecycline, and high-dose ampicillin/sulbactam. This combination of antibiotics seems to be a useful alternative when other treatments are not available or fail.
在接受机械通气的新冠病毒肺炎(COVID-19)患者中,呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)仍然是死亡的关键危险因素。抗生素耐药性是治疗这种感染的一个重要问题。本研究旨在描述入住重症监护病房(ICU)的新型严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染所致急性呼吸衰竭患者中[具体感染名称未给出]重叠感染的演变情况,并比较两种不同抗生素策略对微生物学转阴的影响。
单中心观察性回顾性研究,纳入2020年3月至2021年5月因SARS-CoV-2感染所致急性呼吸衰竭入住我院ICU且发生[具体感染名称未给出]重叠感染的患者。收集患者入住ICU时的临床资料,以及[具体感染名称未给出]的分离时间、耐药谱、感染部位和抗生素治疗情况。
在纳入的32例患者中,10例患者(31.2%)接受了大剂量氨苄西林/舒巴坦、大剂量替加环素、静脉及吸入多粘菌素[具体名称未给出]联合治疗,另外22例(68.8%)接受了两种抗生素联合治疗。在联合治疗组的10例患者中,8例患者(80%)还接受了磷霉素治疗。联合治疗组所有患者(100%)实现了微生物学转阴,而在两种抗生素联合治疗组中,8例(36.4%)患者实现了微生物学转阴,P<0.01。
我们的报告显示,雾化和静脉注射多粘菌素、大剂量替加环素和大剂量氨苄西林/舒巴坦联合治疗的所有患者均实现了微生物学转阴。当其他治疗方法不可用或失败时,这种抗生素联合方案似乎是一种有效的替代方案。