• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于 ADC 特征的放射组学模型预测前列腺癌盆腔淋巴结转移:与临床列线图和 PI-RADS 评估的比较。

Preoperative prediction of pelvic lymph nodes metastasis in prostate cancer using an ADC-based radiomics model: comparison with clinical nomograms and PI-RADS assessment.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.

Beijing Smart Tree Medical Technology Co. Ltd., No. 24, Huangsi Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100011, China.

出版信息

Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022 Sep;47(9):3327-3337. doi: 10.1007/s00261-022-03583-5. Epub 2022 Jun 28.

DOI:10.1007/s00261-022-03583-5
PMID:35763053
Abstract

PURPOSE

To develop and test radiomics models based on manually corrected or automatically gained masks on ADC maps for pelvic lymph node metastasis (PLNM) prediction in patients with prostate cancer (PCa).

METHODS

A primary cohort of 474 patients with PCa who underwent prostate mpMRI were retrospectively enrolled for PLNM prediction between January 2017 and January 2020. They were then randomly split into training/validation (n = 332) and test (n = 142) groups for model development and internal testing. Four radiomics models were developed using four masks (manually corrected/automatic prostate gland and PCa lesion segmentation) based on the ADC maps using the primary cohort. Another cohort of 128 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) with extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) for PCa was used as the testing cohort between February 2020 and October 2021. The performance of the models was evaluated in terms of discrimination and clinical usefulness using the area under the curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis (DCA). The optimal radiomics model was further compared with Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) and Briganti 2017 nomograms, and PI-RADS assessment.

RESULTS

17 (13.28%) Patients with PLNM were included in the testing cohort. The radiomics model based on the mask of automatically segmented prostate obtained the highest AUC among the four radiomics models (0.73 vs. 0.63 vs. 0.70 vs. 0.56). Briganti 2017, MSKCC nomograms, and PI-RADS assessment-yielded AUCs of 0.69, 0.71, and 0.70, respectively, and no significant differences were found compared with the optimal radiomics model (P = 0.605-0.955).

CONCLUSION

The radiomics model based on the mask of automatically segmented prostate offers a non-invasive method to predict PLNM for patients with PCa. It shows comparable accuracy to the current MKSCC and Briganti nomograms.

摘要

目的

开发和测试基于手动校正或自动获得的 ADC 图掩模的放射组学模型,以预测前列腺癌(PCa)患者的盆腔淋巴结转移(PLNM)。

方法

回顾性纳入 2017 年 1 月至 2020 年 1 月期间接受前列腺 mpMRI 的 474 例 PCa 患者的主要队列,以预测 PLNM。然后,他们被随机分为训练/验证(n=332)和测试(n=142)组,用于模型开发和内部测试。使用主要队列中基于 ADC 图的四个掩模(手动校正/自动前列腺和 PCa 病变分割),开发了四个放射组学模型。另一组 128 例接受根治性前列腺切除术(RP)和扩展盆腔淋巴结清扫术(ePLND)的 PCa 患者于 2020 年 2 月至 2021 年 10 月作为测试队列。使用曲线下面积(AUC)和决策曲线分析(DCA)评估模型的鉴别和临床实用性。还将最优放射组学模型与 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center(MSKCC)和 Briganti 2017 列线图以及 PI-RADS 评估进行比较。

结果

在测试队列中纳入了 17 例(13.28%)有 PLNM 的患者。基于自动分割前列腺的掩模的放射组学模型在四个放射组学模型中获得了最高的 AUC(0.73 比 0.63 比 0.70 比 0.56)。Briganti 2017、MSKCC 列线图和 PI-RADS 评估的 AUC 分别为 0.69、0.71 和 0.70,与最优放射组学模型相比无显著差异(P=0.605-0.955)。

结论

基于自动分割前列腺的掩模的放射组学模型为预测 PCa 患者的 PLNM 提供了一种非侵入性方法。其准确性与目前的 MKSCC 和 Briganti 列线图相当。

相似文献

1
Preoperative prediction of pelvic lymph nodes metastasis in prostate cancer using an ADC-based radiomics model: comparison with clinical nomograms and PI-RADS assessment.基于 ADC 特征的放射组学模型预测前列腺癌盆腔淋巴结转移:与临床列线图和 PI-RADS 评估的比较。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022 Sep;47(9):3327-3337. doi: 10.1007/s00261-022-03583-5. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
2
Histological comparison between predictive value of preoperative 3-T multiparametric MRI and Ga-PSMA PET/CT scan for pathological outcomes at radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer.术前 3-T 多参数 MRI 和 Ga-PSMA PET/CT 扫描对前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术和盆腔淋巴结清扫术病理结果的预测价值的组织学比较。
BJU Int. 2021 Jan;127(1):71-79. doi: 10.1111/bju.15134. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
3
Radiomics Models Based on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Maps for the Prediction of High-Grade Prostate Cancer at Radical Prostatectomy: Comparison With Preoperative Biopsy.基于表观扩散系数图的放射组学模型在根治性前列腺切除术前预测高级别前列腺癌的应用:与术前活检的比较。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021 Dec;54(6):1892-1901. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27565. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
4
Utility of diffusion weighted imaging-based radiomics nomogram to predict pelvic lymph nodes metastasis in prostate cancer.基于扩散加权成像的放射组学列线图预测前列腺癌盆腔淋巴结转移的效用。
BMC Med Imaging. 2022 Nov 4;22(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12880-022-00905-3.
5
Development and External Validation of a Novel Nomogram to Predict the Probability of Pelvic Lymph-node Metastases in Prostate Cancer Patients Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Molecular Imaging with Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography.基于磁共振成像和前列腺特异性膜抗原正电子发射断层扫描分子成像的新型列线图预测前列腺癌患者盆腔淋巴结转移概率的建立与外部验证
Eur Urol Oncol. 2023 Dec;6(6):553-563. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.03.010. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
6
Identification of the Optimal Candidates for Nodal Staging with Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Among Prostate Cancer Patients Who Underwent Preoperative Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography. External Validation of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Briganti Nomograms and Development of a Novel Tool.基于术前前列腺特异膜抗原正电子发射断层扫描识别行扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术的前列腺癌患者最佳淋巴结分期候选者:纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心和布里甘蒂列线图的外部验证及新型工具的开发。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2023 Dec;6(6):543-552. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.05.003. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
7
Prediction of pelvic lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer using radiomics based on T-weighted imaging.基于 T2WI 影像的放射组学预测前列腺癌盆腔淋巴结转移。
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022 Aug 28;47(8):1025-1036. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2022.210692.
8
Integration of clinicopathologic identification and deep transferrable image feature representation improves predictions of lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer.临床病理特征识别与深度可迁移图像特征表示的融合提高了前列腺癌淋巴结转移预测的准确性。
EBioMedicine. 2021 Jun;68:103395. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103395. Epub 2021 May 25.
9
Biparametric MRI of the prostate radiomics model for prediction of pelvic lymph node metastasis in prostate cancers : a two-centre study.前列腺多参数 MRI 放射组学模型预测前列腺癌盆腔淋巴结转移:一项双中心研究。
BMC Med Imaging. 2024 Jul 25;24(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12880-024-01372-8.
10
Preoperative PI-RADS Version 2 scores helps improve accuracy of clinical nomograms for predicting pelvic lymph node metastasis at radical prostatectomy.术前 PI-RADS 版本 2 评分有助于提高根治性前列腺切除术预测盆腔淋巴结转移的临床列线图的准确性。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2020 Mar;23(1):116-126. doi: 10.1038/s41391-019-0164-z. Epub 2019 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic accuracy of MRI radiomics in predicting lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer: A systematic review.MRI影像组学在预测前列腺癌淋巴结转移中的诊断准确性:一项系统评价。
Eur J Radiol Open. 2025 Jul 28;15:100673. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2025.100673. eCollection 2025 Dec.
2
Application of radiomics-based prediction model to predict preoperative lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于影像组学的预测模型在预测前列腺癌术前淋巴结转移中的应用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2025 Jun 20;15:1577794. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1577794. eCollection 2025.
3
Deep learning-based fully automated detection and segmentation of pelvic lymph nodes on diffusion-weighted images for prostate cancer: a multicenter study.

本文引用的文献

1
Prostate-specific Antigen Testing as Part of a Risk-Adapted Early Detection Strategy for Prostate Cancer: European Association of Urology Position and Recommendations for 2021.前列腺特异性抗原检测作为前列腺癌风险适应性早期检测策略的一部分:欧洲泌尿外科学会2021年立场与建议
Eur Urol. 2021 Dec;80(6):703-711. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.07.024. Epub 2021 Aug 15.
2
Pathology Informatics Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC).在纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心(MSKCC)的 COVID-19 大流行期间的病理信息学教育。
Acta Med Acad. 2021 Apr;50(1):136-142. doi: 10.5644/ama2006-124.331.
3
Integration of clinicopathologic identification and deep transferrable image feature representation improves predictions of lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer.
基于深度学习的前列腺癌扩散加权图像上盆腔淋巴结的全自动检测与分割:一项多中心研究
Cancer Imaging. 2025 Mar 17;25(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s40644-025-00840-w.
4
Bi-parametric MRI-based quantification radiomics model for the noninvasive prediction of histopathology and biochemical recurrence after prostate cancer surgery: a multicenter study.基于双参数MRI的定量放射组学模型用于前列腺癌手术后组织病理学和生化复发的无创预测:一项多中心研究
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Mar 17. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-04873-4.
5
Comparison between Three Radiomics Models and Clinical Nomograms for Prediction of Lymph Node Involvement in PCa Patients Combining Clinical and Radiomic Features.结合临床和影像组学特征的三种影像组学模型与临床列线图在预测前列腺癌患者淋巴结受累情况中的比较
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jul 31;16(15):2731. doi: 10.3390/cancers16152731.
6
Can Machine Learning Models Detect and Predict Lymph Node Involvement in Prostate Cancer? A Comprehensive Systematic Review.机器学习模型能否检测和预测前列腺癌的淋巴结转移?一项全面的系统评价。
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 10;12(22):7032. doi: 10.3390/jcm12227032.
7
The Use of MRI-Derived Radiomic Models in Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification: A Critical Review of Contemporary Literature.基于MRI的影像组学模型在前列腺癌风险分层中的应用:当代文献的批判性综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 16;13(6):1128. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13061128.
8
Beyond diagnosis: is there a role for radiomics in prostate cancer management?超越诊断:放射组学在前列腺癌管理中是否有作用?
Eur Radiol Exp. 2023 Mar 13;7(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s41747-023-00321-4.
9
Semiautomated pelvic lymph node treatment response evaluation for patients with advanced prostate cancer: based on MET-RADS-P guidelines.基于 MET-RADS-P 指南的晚期前列腺癌患者盆腔淋巴结治疗反应半自动评估。
Cancer Imaging. 2023 Jan 17;23(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40644-023-00523-4.
临床病理特征识别与深度可迁移图像特征表示的融合提高了前列腺癌淋巴结转移预测的准确性。
EBioMedicine. 2021 Jun;68:103395. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103395. Epub 2021 May 25.
4
FeAture Explorer (FAE): A tool for developing and comparing radiomics models.特征探索器(FAE):一种用于开发和比较放射组学模型的工具。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 17;15(8):e0237587. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237587. eCollection 2020.
5
A Prospective Comparison of F-prostate-specific Membrane Antigen-1007 Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography, Whole-body 1.5 T Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Diffusion-weighted Imaging, and Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography with Traditional Imaging in Primary Distant Metastasis Staging of Prostate Cancer (PROSTAGE).F-前列腺特异性膜抗原-1007 正电子发射断层扫描计算机断层扫描、全身 1.5T 磁共振成像弥散加权成像与传统成像单光子发射计算机断层扫描/计算机断层扫描在前列腺癌原发远处转移分期(PROSTAGE)中的前瞻性比较
Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Aug;4(4):635-644. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.06.012. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
6
Radiomics in radiation oncology-basics, methods, and limitations.放射肿瘤学中的放射组学——基础、方法和局限性。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2020 Oct;196(10):848-855. doi: 10.1007/s00066-020-01663-3. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
7
External Validation of the 2019 Briganti Nomogram for the Identification of Prostate Cancer Patients Who Should Be Considered for an Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection.2019 年 Briganti 列线图对前列腺癌患者行扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术的评估作用的外部验证。
Eur Urol. 2020 Aug;78(2):138-142. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.023. Epub 2020 Apr 5.
8
Radiomics: from qualitative to quantitative imaging.放射组学:从定性成像到定量成像。
Br J Radiol. 2020 Apr;93(1108):20190948. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190948. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
9
Feasibility of integrating computer-aided diagnosis with structured reports of prostate multiparametric MRI.将计算机辅助诊断与前列腺多参数 MRI 的结构化报告相结合的可行性。
Clin Imaging. 2020 Mar;60(1):123-130. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2019.12.010. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
10
Development and External Validation of a Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and International Society of Urological Pathology Based Add-On Prediction Tool to Identify Prostate Cancer Candidates for Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection.基于多参数磁共振成像和国际泌尿病理学会的附加预测工具的开发和外部验证,以确定接受盆腔淋巴结清扫术的前列腺癌候选者。
J Urol. 2020 Apr;203(4):713-718. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000652. Epub 2019 Nov 13.