Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa.
Department of Educational Measurement and Statistics, University of Iowa.
J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2022 Aug;131(6):611-625. doi: 10.1037/abn0000649.
Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) aims to advance a dimensional, multilevel understanding of psychopathology across the life span. Two key challenges exist in applying a developmental perspective to RDoC: First, the most accurate informants for assessing a person's psychopathology often differ across development (e.g., parents and teachers may be better informants of a person's externalizing problems in early childhood, whereas peer- and self-report may also be important to assess in adolescence). Second, many constructs change in their behavioral manifestation across development (i.e., heterotypic continuity). Thus, different informants and measures across time may be necessary to account for the construct's changing manifestation. The challenge of using different informants and measures of a construct across time is ensuring that the same construct is assessed in a comparable way across development. Vertical scaling creates a developmental scale to link scores from changing informants and measures to account for heterotypic continuity and study people's development of psychopathology across the life span. This is the first study that created a developmental scale to assess people's development by putting different informants and measures on the same scale. We examined the development of externalizing problems from ages 2 to 15 years (N = 1,364) using annual ratings by mothers, fathers, teachers, other caregivers, and self-report. The developmental scale linked different informants and measures on the same scale. This allowed us to chart people's growth trajectories and to identify multilevel risk factors, including poor verbal comprehension. Creating a developmental scale may be crucial to advance RDoC's goal of studying the development of psychopathology across the life span. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
研究领域标准(RDoC)旨在促进对整个生命周期心理病理学的多维、多层次理解。将发展视角应用于 RDoC 存在两个关键挑战:首先,评估一个人心理病理学的最准确信息来源在不同发展阶段往往不同(例如,父母和老师可能是儿童早期个体外化问题的更好信息来源,而同伴和自我报告也可能对青少年评估很重要)。其次,许多结构在发展过程中表现出行为变化(即异质连续性)。因此,为了说明结构表现的变化,可能需要在不同时间使用不同的信息来源和测量方法。在不同时间使用同一结构的不同信息来源和测量方法的挑战是确保以类似的方式在整个发展过程中评估同一结构。纵向标度创建了一个发展量表,将来自不断变化的信息来源和测量方法的分数联系起来,以解释异质连续性,并研究人们在整个生命周期中心理病理学的发展。这是第一项通过将不同的信息来源和测量方法放在同一个量表上来评估人们发展的研究。我们使用母亲、父亲、教师、其他照顾者和自我报告的年度评分,研究了从 2 岁到 15 岁的外化问题的发展(N=1364)。发展量表将同一量表上的不同信息来源和测量方法联系起来。这使我们能够绘制人们的增长轨迹,并确定多层次风险因素,包括语言理解能力差。创建发展量表可能对于推进 RDoC 研究整个生命周期中心理病理学发展的目标至关重要。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。