Institute of Structural Biology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Physical and Synthetic Biology, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
Nat Commun. 2022 Jul 29;13(1):4396. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31945-6.
Pulsed electron-electron double resonance spectroscopy (PELDOR/DEER) and single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer spectroscopy (smFRET) are frequently used to determine conformational changes, structural heterogeneity, and inter probe distances in biological macromolecules. They provide qualitative information that facilitates mechanistic understanding of biochemical processes and quantitative data for structural modelling. To provide a comprehensive comparison of the accuracy of PELDOR/DEER and smFRET, we use a library of double cysteine variants of four proteins that undergo large-scale conformational changes upon ligand binding. With either method, we use established standard experimental protocols and data analysis routines to determine inter-probe distances in the presence and absence of ligands. The results are compared to distance predictions from structural models. Despite an overall satisfying and similar distance accuracy, some inconsistencies are identified, which we attribute to the use of cryoprotectants for PELDOR/DEER and label-protein interactions for smFRET. This large-scale cross-validation of PELDOR/DEER and smFRET highlights the strengths, weaknesses, and synergies of these two important and complementary tools in integrative structural biology.
脉冲电子-电子双共振波谱学(PELDOR/DEER)和单分子Förster 共振能量转移波谱学(smFRET)常用于确定生物大分子中的构象变化、结构异质性和探针间距离。它们提供了有助于理解生化过程的机制的定性信息和结构建模的定量数据。为了全面比较 PELDOR/DEER 和 smFRET 的准确性,我们使用了一个包含四个在配体结合时发生大规模构象变化的蛋白的双半胱氨酸变体库。使用这两种方法,我们都使用了既定的标准实验方案和数据分析例程来确定有和没有配体时探针之间的距离。结果与结构模型的距离预测进行了比较。尽管整体上满足且相似的距离准确性,但我们发现了一些不一致之处,我们将其归因于 PELDOR/DEER 中使用的冷冻保护剂和 smFRET 中标记蛋白相互作用。这种对 PELDOR/DEER 和 smFRET 的大规模交叉验证突出了这两种重要且互补的综合结构生物学工具的优势、劣势和协同作用。