• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

病原体防御中的矛盾反应:一把双刃剑?

Ambivalent response in pathogen defense: A double-edged sword?

机构信息

Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea; Plant Immunity Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea; Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.

Interdisciplinary Program in Agricultural Genomics, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.

出版信息

Plant Commun. 2022 Nov 14;3(6):100415. doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2022.100415. Epub 2022 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.xplc.2022.100415
PMID:35918895
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9700132/
Abstract

Plants possess effective immune systems that defend against most microbial attackers. Recent plant immunity research has focused on the classic binary defense model involving the pivotal role of small-molecule hormones in regulating the plant defense signaling network. Although most of our current understanding comes from studies that relied on information derived from a limited number of pathosystems, newer studies concerning the incredibly diverse interactions between plants and microbes are providing additional insights into other novel mechanisms. Here, we review the roles of both classical and more recently identified components of defense signaling pathways and stress hormones in regulating the ambivalence effect during responses to diverse pathogens. Because of their different lifestyles, effective defense against biotrophic pathogens normally leads to increased susceptibility to necrotrophs, and vice versa. Given these opposing forces, the plant potentially faces a trade-off when it mounts resistance to a specific pathogen, a phenomenon referred to here as the ambivalence effect. We also highlight a novel mechanism by which translational control of the proteins involved in the ambivalence effect can be used to engineer durable and broad-spectrum disease resistance, regardless of the lifestyle of the invading pathogen.

摘要

植物拥有有效的免疫系统,可以抵御大多数微生物的攻击。最近的植物免疫研究集中在经典的二元防御模型上,该模型涉及小分子激素在调节植物防御信号网络中的关键作用。尽管我们目前的大部分理解来自于依赖于有限数量的病理系统得出的信息的研究,但关于植物和微生物之间令人难以置信的多样化相互作用的新研究正在为其他新机制提供更多的见解。在这里,我们回顾了防御信号通路和应激激素的经典和最近确定的成分在调节对不同病原体的双重反应中的作用。由于它们不同的生活方式,对生物营养型病原体的有效防御通常会导致对坏死营养型病原体的敏感性增加,反之亦然。鉴于这些相反的力量,当植物对特定病原体产生抗性时,它可能面临着一种权衡,这种现象在这里被称为双重反应。我们还强调了一种新的机制,即通过涉及双重反应的蛋白质的翻译控制,可以用来设计持久和广谱的疾病抗性,而不管入侵病原体的生活方式如何。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be31/9700132/c34ca359de8a/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be31/9700132/b8bdfd7517c2/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be31/9700132/c34ca359de8a/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be31/9700132/b8bdfd7517c2/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be31/9700132/c34ca359de8a/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Ambivalent response in pathogen defense: A double-edged sword?病原体防御中的矛盾反应:一把双刃剑?
Plant Commun. 2022 Nov 14;3(6):100415. doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2022.100415. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
2
Hormone defense networking in rice: tales from a different world.水稻中的激素防御网络:来自不同世界的故事。
Trends Plant Sci. 2013 Oct;18(10):555-65. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2013.07.002. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
3
Hormone crosstalk in plant disease and defense: more than just jasmonate-salicylate antagonism.植物疾病与防御中的激素串扰:不止是茉莉酸-水杨酸拮抗作用。
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2011;49:317-43. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-073009-114447.
4
The Janus face of reactive oxygen species in resistance and susceptibility of plants to necrotrophic and biotrophic pathogens.活性氧在植物对坏死亲和性病原菌抗性和易感性中的双面性。
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2012 Oct;59:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.01.014. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
5
Networking by small-molecule hormones in plant immunity.小分子激素在植物免疫中的网络作用
Nat Chem Biol. 2009 May;5(5):308-16. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.164.
6
Plant innate immunity: an updated insight into defense mechanism.植物先天免疫:对防御机制的最新认识。
J Biosci. 2013 Jun;38(2):433-49. doi: 10.1007/s12038-013-9302-2.
7
Necrotrophic Exploitation and Subversion of Plant Defense: A Lifestyle or Just a Phase, and Implications in Breeding Resistance.植物坏死性营养和防御系统的破坏:一种生活方式还是只是一个阶段,及其在抗性育种中的意义。
Phytopathology. 2019 Mar;109(3):332-346. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-09-18-0334-IA. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
8
Nonhost resistance against bacterial pathogens: retrospectives and prospects.非寄主对细菌病原体的抗性:回顾与展望。
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2013;51:407-27. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-082712-102319.
9
Mechanisms and strategies of plant defense against Botrytis cinerea.植物抵御灰葡萄孢的机制与策略
Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2017 Mar;37(2):262-274. doi: 10.1080/07388551.2016.1271767. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
10
Endophytic OsiSh-2-Mediated Balancing between Growth and Disease Resistance in Host Rice.内生菌 OsiSh-2 介导的宿主水稻生长与抗病性之间的平衡。
mBio. 2021 Aug 31;12(4):e0156621. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01566-21. Epub 2021 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

1
A Novel Effector FoUpe9 Enhances the Virulence of f. sp. Tropical Race 4 by Inhibiting Plant Immunity.一种新型效应因子FoUpe9通过抑制植物免疫增强香蕉枯萎病菌4号小种的毒力。
J Fungi (Basel). 2025 Apr 13;11(4):308. doi: 10.3390/jof11040308.
2
Role of Metal-Based Nanoparticles in spp. Plants.金属基纳米颗粒在 spp. 植物中的作用。 (注:原文中“spp.”表述不太完整规范,可能会影响对具体含义的理解,但按要求准确翻译如此。)
ACS Omega. 2025 Mar 14;10(11):10756-10768. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c11102. eCollection 2025 Mar 25.
3
Impact of Nutrient Stress on Plant Disease Resistance.

本文引用的文献

1
Simultaneous mutations in and fully suppress the dwarf and autoimmune phenotypes of mutant.和 同时突变完全抑制了 突变体的矮小和自身免疫表型。
Plant Signal Behav. 2022 Dec 31;17(1):2046412. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2022.2046412.
2
Genome-edited powdery mildew resistance in wheat without growth penalties.编辑基因组提高小麦对白粉病的抗性而不影响生长。
Nature. 2022 Feb;602(7897):455-460. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04395-9. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
3
A rice gene encoding glycosyl hydrolase plays contrasting roles in immunity depending on the type of pathogens.
营养胁迫对植物抗病性的影响。
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Feb 19;26(4):1780. doi: 10.3390/ijms26041780.
4
Abscisic Acid Can Play a Dual Role in the - Pathosystem.脱落酸在病原系统中可发挥双重作用。
Plants (Basel). 2025 Jan 24;14(3):355. doi: 10.3390/plants14030355.
5
Omic characterisation of multi-component defences against the necrotrophic pathogen Pyrenophora tritici-repentis in wheat.小麦中针对坏死营养型病原菌小麦根腐离蠕孢的多组分防御机制的组学特征分析
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2025 Apr;27(3):347-361. doi: 10.1111/plb.13746. Epub 2025 Feb 7.
6
Two pathogen-inducible UDP-glycosyltransferases, UGT73C3 and UGT73C4, catalyze the glycosylation of pinoresinol to promote plant immunity in Arabidopsis.两种病原体诱导型UDP-糖基转移酶UGT73C3和UGT73C4催化松脂醇的糖基化反应,以促进拟南芥的植物免疫。
Plant Commun. 2025 Apr 14;6(4):101261. doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2025.101261. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
7
Diversity and Evolution of Genes in Species.物种中基因的多样性与进化
Biology (Basel). 2024 Oct 14;13(10):822. doi: 10.3390/biology13100822.
8
The Role of Salicylic, Jasmonic Acid and Ethylene in the Development of the Resistance/Susceptibility of Wheat to the SnTox1-Producing Isolate of the Pathogenic Fungus (Berk.).水杨酸、茉莉酸和乙烯在小麦对产SnTox1的致病真菌(伯克氏菌)分离株的抗性/易感性发展中的作用
Plants (Basel). 2024 Sep 10;13(18):2546. doi: 10.3390/plants13182546.
9
Transcriptome analysis unravels the biocontrol mechanism of Serratia plymuthica A30 against potato soft rot caused by Dickeya solani.转录组分析揭示了粘质沙雷氏菌 A30 对由软腐病迪氏菌引起的马铃薯软腐病的生物防治机制。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 6;19(9):e0308744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308744. eCollection 2024.
10
Sweet Cherry Plants Prioritize Their Response to Cope with Summer Drought, Overshadowing the Defense Response to pv. .甜樱桃植株优先应对夏季干旱的反应,而使对……的防御反应黯然失色。 (注:原文中“pv.”后面内容不完整,翻译可能存在一定局限性)
Plants (Basel). 2024 Jun 24;13(13):1737. doi: 10.3390/plants13131737.
一个编码糖基水解酶的水稻基因根据病原体的类型在免疫中发挥相反的作用。
Mol Plant Pathol. 2022 Mar;23(3):400-416. doi: 10.1111/mpp.13167. Epub 2021 Nov 28.
4
Activation of TIR signalling boosts pattern-triggered immunity.TIR 信号的激活增强了模式触发的免疫。
Nature. 2021 Oct;598(7881):500-503. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03987-1. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
5
The EDS1-PAD4-ADR1 node mediates Arabidopsis pattern-triggered immunity.EDS1-PAD4-ADR1 节点介导拟南芥模式触发免疫。
Nature. 2021 Oct;598(7881):495-499. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03829-0. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
6
Pattern-recognition receptors are required for NLR-mediated plant immunity.模式识别受体是 NLR 介导的植物免疫所必需的。
Nature. 2021 Apr;592(7852):105-109. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03316-6. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
7
Mutual potentiation of plant immunity by cell-surface and intracellular receptors.细胞表面和细胞内受体增强植物免疫。
Nature. 2021 Apr;592(7852):110-115. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03315-7. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
8
Two nuclear effectors of the rice blast fungus modulate host immunity via transcriptional reprogramming.水稻恶苗病菌的两个核效应物通过转录重编程调节宿主免疫。
Nat Commun. 2020 Nov 17;11(1):5845. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19624-w.
9
Intimate Association of PRR- and NLR-Mediated Signaling in Plant Immunity.PRR 和 NLR 介导的信号在植物免疫中的密切关联。
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2021 Jan;34(1):3-14. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-08-20-0239-IA. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
10
Exogenous fragmented DNA acts as a damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) inducing changes in CpG DNA methylation and defence-related responses in Lactuca sativa.外源性片段化DNA作为一种损伤相关分子模式(DAMP),可诱导生菜中CpG DNA甲基化的变化以及与防御相关的反应。
Funct Plant Biol. 2018 Oct;45(10):1065-1072. doi: 10.1071/FP18011.