Pucchio Aidan, Krance Saffire H, Pur Daiana R, Miranda Rafael N, Felfeli Tina
School of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2022 Aug 7;16:2463-2476. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S377262. eCollection 2022.
This systematic review explores the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the analysis of biofluid markers in age-related macular degeneration (AMD). We detail the accuracy and validity of AI in diagnostic and prognostic models and biofluid markers that provide insight into AMD pathogenesis and progression. This review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted across 5 electronic databases including Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, EMBASE, Medline, and Web of Science from inception to July 14, 2021. Studies pertaining to biofluid marker analysis using AI or bioinformatics in AMD were included. Identified studies were assessed for risk of bias and critically appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools. A total of 10,264 articles were retrieved from all databases and 37 studies met the inclusion criteria, including 15 cross-sectional studies, 15 prospective cohort studies, five retrospective cohort studies, one randomized controlled trial, and one case-control study. The majority of studies had a general focus on AMD (58%), while neovascular AMD (nAMD) was the focus in 11 studies (30%), and geographic atrophy (GA) was highlighted by three studies. Fifteen studies examined disease characteristics, 15 studied risk factors, and seven guided treatment decisions. Altered lipid metabolism (HDL-cholesterol, total serum triglycerides), inflammation (c-reactive protein), oxidative stress, and protein digestion were implicated in AMD development and progression. AI tools were able to both accurately differentiate controls and AMD patients with accuracies as high as 87% and predict responsiveness to anti-VEGF therapy in nAMD patients. Use of AI models such as discriminant analysis could inform prognostic and diagnostic decision-making in a clinical setting. The identified pathways provide opportunity for future studies of AMD development and could be valuable in the advancement of novel treatments.
本系统评价探讨了人工智能(AI)在年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)生物流体标志物分析中的应用。我们详细阐述了AI在诊断和预后模型以及生物流体标志物方面的准确性和有效性,这些标志物有助于深入了解AMD的发病机制和进展。本评价按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目指南进行。从创刊至2021年7月14日,对包括Cochrane对照试验中央登记册、Cochrane系统评价数据库、EMBASE、Medline和科学网在内的5个电子数据库进行了全面检索。纳入了使用AI或生物信息学进行AMD生物流体标志物分析的研究。使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的批判性评价工具对纳入的研究进行偏倚风险评估和严格评价。从所有数据库中检索到10264篇文章,37项研究符合纳入标准,包括15项横断面研究、15项前瞻性队列研究、5项回顾性队列研究、1项随机对照试验和1项病例对照研究。大多数研究普遍关注AMD(58%),而11项研究(30%)聚焦于新生血管性AMD(nAMD),另有3项研究突出了地图样萎缩(GA)。15项研究检查了疾病特征,15项研究了危险因素,7项研究指导了治疗决策。脂质代谢改变(高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、总血清甘油三酯)、炎症(C反应蛋白)、氧化应激和蛋白质消化与AMD的发生和进展有关。AI工具能够准确区分对照组和AMD患者,准确率高达87%,并能预测nAMD患者对抗血管内皮生长因子(anti-VEGF)治疗的反应。使用判别分析等AI模型可为临床环境中的预后和诊断决策提供参考。所确定的途径为未来AMD发展的研究提供了机会,可能对新疗法的推进具有重要价值。