• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估角膜曲率计对长眼轴眼人工晶状体计算公式的影响。

Assessment of the influence of keratometry on intraocular lens calculation formulas in long axial length eyes.

机构信息

Joint Shantou International Eye Center of Shantou University and The Chinese University of Hong Kong, North Dongxia Road, Shantou, 515041, Guangdong, China.

Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

Int Ophthalmol. 2022 Oct;42(10):3211-3219. doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02322-5. Epub 2022 Sep 3.

DOI:10.1007/s10792-022-02322-5
PMID:36057757
Abstract

PURPOSE

Hyperopic surprises tend to occur in axial myopic eyes and other factors including corneal curvature have rarely been analyzed in cataract surgery, especially in eyes with long axial length (≥ 26.0 mm). Thus, the purpose of our study was to evaluate the influence of keratometry on four different formulas (SRK/T, Barrett Universal II, Haigis and Olsen) in intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation for long eyes.

METHODS

Retrospective case series. A total of 180 eyes with axial length (AL) ≥ 26.0 mm were divided into 3 keratometry (K) groups: K ≤ 42.0 D (Flat), K ≥ 46.0 D (Steep), 42.0 < K < 46.0 D (Average), and all the eyes were underwent phacoemulsification cataract surgery with Rayner (Hove, UK) 920H IOL implantation. Prediction errors (PE) were compared between different formulas to assess the accuracy of different formulas. Multiple regression analysis was performed to investigate factors associated with the PE.

RESULTS

The mean absolute error was higher for all evaluated formulas in Steep group (ranging from 0.66 D to 1.02 D) than the Flat (0.34 D to 0.67 D) and Average groups (0.40 D to 0.74D). The median absolute errors predicted by Olsen formula were significantly lower than that predicted by Haigis formula (0.42 D versus 0.85 D in Steep and 0.29 D versus 0.69 D in Average) in Steep and Average groups (P = 0.012, P < 0.001, respectively). And the Olsen formula demonstrated equal accuracy to the Barrett II formula in Flat and Average groups. The predictability of the SRK/T formula was affected by the AL and K, while the predictability of Olsen and Haigis formulas was affected by the AL only.

CONCLUSIONS

Steep cornea has more influence on the accuracy of IOL power calculation than the other corneal shape in long eyes. Overall, both the Olsen and Barrett Universal II formulas are recommended in long eyes with unusual keratometry.

摘要

目的

远视离焦在轴性近视眼中较为常见,而角膜曲率等其他因素在白内障手术中很少被分析,尤其是在眼轴较长(≥26.0mm)的情况下。因此,本研究旨在评估角膜曲率对四种不同公式(SRK/T、Barrett Universal II、Haigis 和 Olsen)在长眼眼人工晶状体(IOL)屈光力计算中的影响。

方法

回顾性病例系列研究。共纳入 180 例眼轴(AL)≥26.0mm 的患者,分为 3 个角膜曲率(K)组:K≤42.0D(平)、K≥46.0D(陡)、42.0<K<46.0D(平均),所有患者均行白内障超声乳化吸除术联合 Rayner(英国霍夫)920H IOL 植入术。比较不同公式的预测误差(PE),以评估不同公式的准确性。进行多元回归分析以探讨与 PE 相关的因素。

结果

陡组所有评估公式的平均绝对误差均高于平组(0.34D-0.67D)和平均组(0.40D-0.74D)(0.66D-1.02D)。Olsen 公式预测的中位数绝对误差在陡组(0.42D 与 Haigis 公式的 0.85D 相比)和平均组(0.29D 与 Haigis 公式的 0.69D 相比)均显著低于 Haigis 公式,差异有统计学意义(P=0.012,P<0.001)。Olsen 公式在平组和平均组的准确性与 Barrett II 公式相当。SRK/T 公式的预测能力受 AL 和 K 的影响,而 Olsen 和 Haigis 公式的预测能力仅受 AL 的影响。

结论

在长眼患者中,陡角膜对 IOL 屈光力计算的准确性影响大于其他角膜形态。总体而言,在角膜曲率异常的长眼中,推荐使用 Olsen 和 Barrett Universal II 公式。

相似文献

1
Assessment of the influence of keratometry on intraocular lens calculation formulas in long axial length eyes.评估角膜曲率计对长眼轴眼人工晶状体计算公式的影响。
Int Ophthalmol. 2022 Oct;42(10):3211-3219. doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02322-5. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
2
Comparison of accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation for eyes with an axial length greater than 29.0 mm.比较眼轴长度大于 29.0mm 的眼睛的人工晶状体屈光力计算的准确性。
Int Ophthalmol. 2022 Jul;42(7):2029-2038. doi: 10.1007/s10792-021-02194-1. Epub 2022 May 10.
3
[Alternative method of intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with short axial length].[短眼轴眼内人工晶状体屈光力计算的替代方法]
Vestn Oftalmol. 2022;138(3):24-28. doi: 10.17116/oftalma202213803124.
4
[Intraocular lens power calculation for high myopic eyes with cataract: comparison of three formulas].[白内障高度近视眼人工晶状体屈光度计算:三种公式的比较]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Apr 11;53(4):260-265. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2017.04.007.
5
Comparison of IOL Power Calculation Formulas for a Trifocal IOL in Eyes With High Myopia.高度近视眼三焦点人工晶状体的 IOL 计算公式比较。
J Refract Surg. 2021 Aug;37(8):538-544. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20210506-01. Epub 2021 Aug 1.
6
Algorithmic intraocular lens power calculation formula selection by keratometry, anterior chamber depth and axial length.基于角膜曲率计、前房深度和眼轴长度的人工晶状体计算公式选择的算法。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2022 May;100(3):e701-e709. doi: 10.1111/aos.14956. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
7
Accuracy of intraocular lens calculation formulas in cataract patients with steep corneal curvature.在角膜曲率陡峭的白内障患者中,人工晶状体计算公式的准确性。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 20;15(11):e0241630. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241630. eCollection 2020.
8
Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with extreme myopia: Comparison of Barrett Universal II, Haigis, and Olsen formulas.高度近视眼的人工晶状体度数计算:Barrett Universal II、Haigis 和 Olsen 公式的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 Jun;45(6):732-737. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.12.025. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
9
Accuracy of Modern Intraocular Lens Formulas in Highly Myopic Eyes Implanted With Plate-Haptic Intraocular Lenses.高度近视眼植入板式襻人工晶状体后现代人工晶状体计算公式的准确性
Am J Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep;265:105-116. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2024.04.017. Epub 2024 May 3.
10
[Comparison of the accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas based on the new swept-source optical coherence tomography biometry].[基于新型扫频源光学相干断层扫描生物测量法的人工晶状体屈光力计算公式准确性比较]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Jul 11;57(7):502-511. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20200729-00511.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Prior Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis on the Calibration Accuracy of Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses: A Direct Comparative Study.准分子原位角膜磨镶术史对扩展景深人工晶状体校准精度的影响:一项直接对比研究。
J Pers Med. 2025 Jul 10;15(7):301. doi: 10.3390/jpm15070301.
2
Comparison of Intraocular Lens Formulas in Patients With Postoperative Refractive Surprise.术后屈光意外患者人工晶状体计算公式的比较
Cureus. 2024 Dec 2;16(12):e74991. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74991. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
IOL power calculation in long eyes: Selection of the best axial length adjustement factor using the most common formulas.

本文引用的文献

1
Reply.回复。
Ophthalmology. 2021 Apr;128(4):e21-e22. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.10.037. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
2
Accuracy of common IOL power formulas in 611 eyes based on axial length and corneal power ranges.基于眼轴长度和角膜曲率范围的 611 只眼中常见人工晶状体计算公式的准确性。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2021 Dec;105(12):1661-1665. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-315882. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
3
Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence Formulas and Axial Length Adjustments for Highly Myopic Eyes.人工智能公式和高度近视眼轴长度调整的准确性。
长眼的人工晶状体度数计算:使用最常用公式选择最佳眼轴长度调整因子。
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 23;10(17):e36609. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36609. eCollection 2024 Sep 15.
4
Comparison of keratometric values and anterior segment parameters measured using Scheimpflug Sirius topography and Lenstar biometry.应用 Scheimpflug Sirius 眼前节分析仪和 Lenstar 生物测量仪测量的角膜曲率计值和眼前节参数的比较。
Int Ophthalmol. 2024 Feb 20;44(1):103. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-03046-4.
5
Agreement between a new optical low coherence reflectometry biometer and an anterior segment optical coherence tomographer.一种新型光学低相干反射生物测量仪与眼前节光学相干断层扫描仪之间的一致性
Eye Vis (Lond). 2023 Feb 25;10(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40662-023-00330-9.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Mar;223:100-107. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.09.019. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
4
Comparison of Predictability Using Barrett Universal II and SRK/T Formulas according to Keratometry.根据角膜曲率计比较使用巴雷特通用II公式和SRK/T公式的可预测性。
J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jun 19;2020:7625725. doi: 10.1155/2020/7625725. eCollection 2020.
5
Intraocular lens formula comparison in axial hyperopia with a high-power intraocular lens of 30 or more diopters.使用30屈光度及以上的高屈光度人工晶状体对轴性远视患者人工晶状体计算公式的比较
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020 Sep;46(9):1236-1239. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000235.
6
Effect of Axial Length Adjustment Methods on Intraocular Lens Power Calculation in Highly Myopic Eyes.轴向长度调整方法对高度近视眼中人工晶状体屈光力计算的影响。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jun;214:110-118. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.02.023. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
7
Agreement of ocular biometric measurements in young healthy eyes between IOLMaster 700 and OA-2000.IOLMaster 700 与 OA-2000 在年轻健康眼中测量眼生物参数的一致性。
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 21;10(1):3134. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59919-y.
8
Effect of lens constants optimization on the accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas for highly myopic eyes.晶状体常数优化对高度近视眼人工晶状体屈光度计算公式准确性的影响。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2019 Jun 18;12(6):943-948. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2019.06.10. eCollection 2019.
9
Accuracy and Precision of Intraocular Lens Calculations Using the New Hill-RBF Version 2.0 in Eyes With High Axial Myopia.高度近视眼中新型 Hill-RBF 版本 2.0 计算人工晶状体的准确性和精密度。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2019 Sep;205:66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.04.019. Epub 2019 May 10.
10
Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with extreme myopia: Comparison of Barrett Universal II, Haigis, and Olsen formulas.高度近视眼的人工晶状体度数计算:Barrett Universal II、Haigis 和 Olsen 公式的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 Jun;45(6):732-737. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.12.025. Epub 2019 Mar 12.