Health and Physical Education Department, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh 11586, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Sport Kinanthropology, Faculty of Sports, University of Prešov, 080 01 Prešov, Slovakia.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 29;19(17):10773. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710773.
The present study aimed to verify the effects of running-specific strength training alone, endurance training alone, and concurrent training on recreational endurance athletes' performance and selected anthropometric parameters.
Thirty male recreational endurance runners were randomly assigned using a blocking technique to either a running-specific strength training group (RSSTG), an endurance training group (ETG), or a concurrent training group (CTG). RSSTG performed three strength-training sessions per week orientated to running, ETG underwent three endurance sessions per week, and CTG underwent a 3-day-per-week concurrent training program performed on non-consecutive days, alternating the strength and endurance training sessions applied to RSSTG and ETG. The training protocol lasted 12 weeks and was designed using the ATR (Accumulation, Transmutation, Realization) block periodization system. The following assessments were conducted before and after the training protocol: body mass (BM), body mass index (BMI), body fat percentage (BFP), lean mass (LM), countermovement jump (CMJ), 1RM (one-repetition maximum) squat, running economy at 12 and 14 km/h (RE12 and RE14), maximum oxygen consumption (VOmax), and anaerobic threshold (AnT).
RSSTG significantly improved the results in CMJ, 1RM squat, RE12, and RE14. ETG significantly improved in RE12, RE14, VOmax, and AnT. Finally, CTG, obtained significant improvements in BFP, LM, CMJ, 1RM squat, RE12, RE14, VOmax, and AnT. RSSTG obtained improvements significantly higher than ETG in CMJ, 1RM squat, and RE14. ETG results were significantly better than those attained by RSSTG in AnT. Moreover, CTG marks were significantly higher than those obtained by ETG in CMJ and RE14.
Performing a 12-week concurrent training program integrated into the ATR periodization system effectively improves body composition and performance variables that can be obtained with exclusive running-specific strength and endurance training in recreational runners aged 30 to 40. Running-specific strength training enhances maximum and explosive strength and RE, whereas exclusive endurance training improves VOmax, AnT, and RE. Performing concurrent training on non-consecutive days effectively prevents the strength and endurance adaptations attained with single-mode exercise from being attenuated. The ATR periodization system is useful in improving recreational endurance athletes' performance parameters, especially when performing concurrent training programs.
本研究旨在验证单独进行跑步专项力量训练、耐力训练和同时训练对娱乐性长跑运动员的表现和选定人体测量参数的影响。
30 名男性娱乐性长跑运动员采用分组技术随机分配至跑步专项力量训练组(RSSTG)、耐力训练组(ETG)或同时训练组(CTG)。RSSTG 每周进行三次以跑步为导向的力量训练,ETG 每周进行三次耐力训练,CTG 每周进行三次非连续日的同时训练计划,交替进行 RSSTG 和 ETG 的力量和耐力训练。训练方案持续 12 周,采用 ATR(积累、转化、实现)块周期化系统设计。在训练方案前后进行了以下评估:体重(BM)、体重指数(BMI)、体脂百分比(BFP)、瘦体重(LM)、纵跳(CMJ)、1RM(最大重复次数)深蹲、12 和 14km/h 时的跑步经济性(RE12 和 RE14)、最大摄氧量(VOmax)和无氧阈(AnT)。
RSSTG 显著提高了 CMJ、1RM 深蹲、RE12 和 RE14 的结果。ETG 显著提高了 RE12、RE14、VOmax 和 AnT。最后,CTG 在 BFP、LM、CMJ、1RM 深蹲、RE12、RE14、VOmax 和 AnT 方面均获得了显著改善。RSSTG 在 CMJ、1RM 深蹲和 RE14 方面的改善明显高于 ETG。ETG 结果在 AnT 方面明显优于 RSSTG。此外,CTG 得分明显高于 ETG 在 CMJ 和 RE14 方面的得分。
在 30 至 40 岁的娱乐性跑步运动员中,执行 12 周的融入 ATR 周期化系统的同时训练方案可有效改善身体成分和表现变量,而单独进行跑步专项力量和耐力训练可获得这些变量。跑步专项力量训练可增强最大力量和爆发力以及 RE,而单独进行耐力训练可提高 VOmax、AnT 和 RE。在非连续日进行同时训练可有效防止因单一模式运动而导致的力量和耐力适应性降低。ATR 周期化系统在提高娱乐性长跑运动员的表现参数方面非常有用,尤其是在执行同时训练方案时。