• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初次全髋关节置换术后脱位早期翻修的预测模型。

Prediction model for an early revision for dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty.

机构信息

Coxa Hospital for Joint Replacement, Tampere, Finland.

Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Sep 9;17(9):e0274384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274384. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0274384
PMID:36084121
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9462822/
Abstract

Dislocation is one of the most common complications after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Several patient-related risk factors for dislocation have been reported in the previous literature, but only few prediction models for dislocation have been made. Our aim was to build a prediction model for an early (within the first 2 years) revision for dislocation after primary THA using two different statistical methods. The study data constituted of 37 pre- or perioperative variables and postoperative follow-up data of 16 454 primary THAs performed at our institution in 2008-2021. Model I was a traditional logistic regression model and Model II was based on the elastic net method that utilizes machine learning. The models' overall performance was measured using the pseudo R2 values. The discrimination of the models was measured using C-index in Model I and Area Under the Curve (AUC) in Model II. Calibration curves were made for both models. At 2 years postoperatively, 95 hips (0.6% prevalence) had been revised for dislocation. The pseudo R2 values were 0.04 in Model I and 0.02 in Model II indicating low predictive capability in both models. The C-index in Model I was 0.67 and the AUC in Model II was 0.73 indicating modest discrimination. The prediction of an early revision for dislocation after primary THA is difficult even in a large cohort of patients with detailed data available because of the reasonably low prevalence and multifactorial nature of dislocation. Therefore, the risk of dislocation should be kept in mind in every primary THA, whether the patient has predisposing factors for dislocation or not. Further, when conducting a prediction model, sophisticated methods that utilize machine learning may not necessarily offer significant advantage over traditional statistical methods in clinical setup.

摘要

脱位是初次全髋关节置换术(THA)后最常见的并发症之一。既往文献报道了多种与患者相关的脱位危险因素,但仅有少数脱位预测模型。我们的目的是使用两种不同的统计方法建立初次 THA 后早期(2 年内)因脱位而翻修的预测模型。该研究的数据包括 2008 年至 2021 年在我院进行的 16454 例初次 THA 的术前或围手术期变量和术后随访数据。模型 I 是传统的逻辑回归模型,模型 II 基于弹性网络方法,利用机器学习。模型的整体性能通过伪 R2 值进行测量。模型 I 的判别能力通过 C 指数进行测量,模型 II 的判别能力通过曲线下面积(AUC)进行测量。为两个模型都制作了校准曲线。术后 2 年,95 髋(0.6%的患病率)因脱位而翻修。模型 I 的伪 R2 值为 0.04,模型 II 的伪 R2 值为 0.02,表明两个模型的预测能力都较低。模型 I 的 C 指数为 0.67,模型 II 的 AUC 为 0.73,表明有一定的判别能力。即使在具有详细数据的大量患者中,由于脱位的合理低患病率和多因素性质,初次 THA 后早期翻修脱位的预测也很困难。因此,无论患者是否存在脱位的易患因素,在进行初次 THA 时都应牢记脱位的风险。此外,在进行预测模型时,利用机器学习的复杂方法在临床设置中不一定比传统统计方法具有显著优势。

相似文献

1
Prediction model for an early revision for dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty.初次全髋关节置换术后脱位早期翻修的预测模型。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 9;17(9):e0274384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274384. eCollection 2022.
2
Robotic Assistance for Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Associated With Lower Risk of Revision for Dislocation When Compared to Manual Techniques.与手动技术相比,机器人辅助后路全髋关节置换术的脱位翻修风险更低。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Jun;37(6):1124-1129. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.01.085. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
3
Changing Surgical Approach From Primary to Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Not Associated With Increased Risk of Dislocation or Re-Revisions.从初次全髋关节置换术转为翻修全髋关节置换术时改变手术入路与脱位或再翻修风险增加无关。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Jul;37(7S):S622-S627. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.03.007. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
4
Outcomes of revision total hip arthroplasty using the modular dual mobility acetabular system to treat recurrent dislocation.使用模块化双动髋臼系统治疗复发性脱位的翻修全髋关节置换术的结果
Int Orthop. 2022 Apr;46(4):789-795. doi: 10.1007/s00264-021-05280-2. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
5
Treatment strategies for recurrent dislocation following total hip arthroplasty: relationship between cause of dislocation and type of revision surgery.全髋关节置换术后复发性脱位的治疗策略:脱位原因与翻修手术类型的关系。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Mar 29;24(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06355-4.
6
Creation of a Total Hip Arthroplasty Patient-Specific Dislocation Risk Calculator.全髋关节置换术患者特定脱位风险计算器的创建。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022 Jun 15;104(12):1068-1080. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.21.01171. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
7
Outcome and risk factors of failures associated with revision total hip arthroplasty for recurrent dislocation.复发性脱位翻修全髋关节置换术相关失败的结局及危险因素
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Aug;142(8):1801-1807. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03814-2. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
8
Incidence, Timing, and Predictors of Hip Dislocation After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis.原发性骨关节炎全髋关节置换术后髋关节脱位的发生率、时间及预测因素。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022 Nov 1;30(21):1047-1053. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00150. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
9
Revision hip arthroplasty dislocation risk calculator: when to select dual mobility, large heads, constrained liners, or a standard head size? Testing one hundred thousand hip revisions with artificial intelligence.髋关节翻修术后脱位风险计算器:何时选择双动头、大头、约束衬垫或标准头尺寸?使用人工智能测试 10 万例髋关节翻修术。
Int Orthop. 2023 Aug;47(8):2003-2011. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-05856-0. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
10
Utilizing Dual Mobility Components for First-Time Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Instability.初次翻修全髋关节置换术治疗不稳定时采用双动组件。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Feb;33(2):505-509. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.09.029. Epub 2017 Sep 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidence and Clinical Risk Factors of Post-Operative Complications following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A 10-Year Population-Based Cohort Study.初次全髋关节置换术后手术并发症的发生率及临床危险因素:一项基于人群的10年队列研究。
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 27;13(1):160. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010160.
2
AI-based hip prosthesis failure prediction through evolutional radiological indices.基于人工智能的髋关节假体失效预测:通过进化影像学指标。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Feb;144(2):895-907. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05069-5. Epub 2023 Oct 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk factors for dislocation after primary total hip replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 125 studies involving approximately five million hip replacements.初次全髋关节置换术后脱位的危险因素:对125项涉及约500万例髋关节置换术的研究进行的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Rheumatol. 2019 Oct;1(2):e111-e121. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(19)30045-1. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
2
To Explain or to Predict: Important Aspect to Consider Also in Orthopaedics: Letter to the Editor.
Am J Sports Med. 2021 Nov;49(13):NP63-NP64. doi: 10.1177/03635465211030215.
3
Development of machine learning algorithms to predict achievement of minimal clinically important difference for the KOOS-PS following total knee arthroplasty.开发机器学习算法以预测全膝关节置换术后膝关节损伤和骨关节炎疗效评分-身体功能(KOOS-PS)达到最小临床重要差异的情况。
J Orthop Res. 2022 Apr;40(4):808-815. doi: 10.1002/jor.25125. Epub 2021 Jul 18.
4
Preoperative Risk Prediction Models for Short-Term Revision and Death After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Data from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.全髋关节置换术后短期翻修和死亡的术前风险预测模型:来自芬兰关节置换登记处的数据。
JB JS Open Access. 2021 Jan 25;6(1). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.20.00091. eCollection 2021 Jan-Mar.
5
Deep Learning Artificial Intelligence Model for Assessment of Hip Dislocation Risk Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty From Postoperative Radiographs.基于术后 X 线片的深度学习人工智能模型评估初次全髋关节置换术后髋关节脱位风险
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jun;36(6):2197-2203.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.02.028. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
6
Development of a Novel, Potentially Universal Machine Learning Algorithm for Prediction of Complications After Total Hip Arthroplasty.开发一种用于预测全髋关节置换术后并发症的新型、可能通用的机器学习算法。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 May;36(5):1655-1662.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.12.040. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
7
"True" Cumulative Incidence of and Risk Factors for Hip Dislocation within 2 Years After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Due to Osteoarthritis: A Nationwide Population-Based Study from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register."True" 全髋关节置换术后 2 年内因骨关节炎导致髋关节脱位的累积发生率和危险因素:来自丹麦髋关节置换登记处的全国基于人群的研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Feb 17;103(4):295-302. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.01352.
8
Machine Learning Predicts the Fall Risk of Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients Based on Wearable Sensor Instrumented Performance Tests.基于可穿戴传感器仪器性能测试的全髋关节置换术患者跌倒风险的机器学习预测。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Feb;36(2):573-578. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.08.034. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
9
Return to Work After Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Predictive Model.全关节置换术后重返工作岗位:预测模型。
Orthopedics. 2020 Sep 1;43(5):e415-e420. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20200619-12. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
10
Increased risk for dislocation after introduction of the Continuum cup system: lessons learnt from a cohort of 1,381 THRs after 1-year follow-up.连续杯系统引入后脱位风险增加:1 年随访 1381 例 THR 后的经验教训。
Acta Orthop. 2020 Jun;91(3):279-285. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1744981. Epub 2020 Apr 1.