Paridans Marine, Monseur Justine, Donneau Anne-Françoise, Gillain Nicolas, Husson Eddy, Leclercq Dieudonné, Meuris Christelle, Darcis Gilles, Moutschen Michel, Saegerman Claude, Gillet Laurent, Bureau Fabrice, Guillaume Michèle, Pétré Benoit
Public Health Department, Liège University, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Biostatistics Unit-Public Health Department, Liège University, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Sep 6;10(9):1485. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10091485.
While many studies have documented the intentions for the COVID-19 vaccine booster, few have explored the change from intention to final decision. This study explores the COVID-19 booster intentions and the change from intention to decision in a primo-vaccinated university population, with a distinction between staff members and students. It looks at the sociodemographic and medical characteristics, health literacy, personal COVID-19 infection and vaccination history, and attitudes/intentions regarding the booster, among the 1030 participants (64.4% staff members, 61.3% female, median age 36.0 years). Of the 8.7% who were initially hesitant, 72.7% ultimately got a booster and 27.3% did not. Another 84.2% intended to get a booster and 7.1% did not. Among the latter two groups, 88.9% maintained their intention and 11.1% changed their minds. The determinants associated with the intentions were health literacy and previous intentions regarding the COVID-19 primo-vaccination. The determinants associated with the change to non-vaccination were a previous COVID-19 infection, a past COVID-19 primo-vaccination intention, and a neutralizing antibody level. The results point to an opening for the support in decision-making, with a significant percentage of the study population potentially changing their mind between intention and final decision; this process should start early and be tailored to the individual's COVID-19 history. A personalized approach seems necessary in order to ensure that individuals make an informed choice.
虽然许多研究记录了接种新冠疫苗加强针的意向,但很少有研究探讨从意向到最终决定的转变。本研究在首次接种疫苗的大学人群中,区分教职员工和学生,探讨了新冠疫苗加强针的意向以及从意向到决定的转变。该研究考察了1030名参与者(64.4%为教职员工,61.3%为女性,年龄中位数36.0岁)的社会人口学和医学特征、健康素养、个人新冠病毒感染和疫苗接种史,以及对加强针的态度/意向。最初犹豫不决的8.7%的人中,72.7%最终接种了加强针,27.3%没有接种。另有84.2%的人打算接种加强针,7.1%的人不打算接种。在后面这两组人中,88.9%维持了他们的意向,11.1%改变了主意。与意向相关的决定因素是健康素养和之前对新冠疫苗首次接种的意向。与改为不接种相关的决定因素是既往新冠病毒感染、过去的新冠疫苗首次接种意向以及中和抗体水平。研究结果表明在决策支持方面存在一个切入点,相当大比例的研究人群可能在意向和最终决定之间改变主意;这个过程应该尽早开始,并根据个人的新冠病毒感染史进行调整。为确保个人做出明智的选择,个性化方法似乎是必要的。