• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价使用 3D 打印技术制作牙科临时修复体的丙烯酸树脂的生物膜形成情况。

Evaluation of biofilm formation on acrylic resins used to fabricate dental temporary restorations with the use of 3D printing technology.

机构信息

Department of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Institute of Health Sciences, Collegium Medicum, University of Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra, Poland.

Dental Clinic Diamante, Lubin, Poland.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2022 Oct 13;22(1):442. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02488-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12903-022-02488-5
PMID:36229871
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9563793/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Temporary implant-retained restorations are required to support function and esthetics of the masticatory system until the final restoration is completed and delivered. Acrylic resins are commonly used in prosthetic dentistry and lately they have been used in three-dimensional (3D) printing technology. Since this technology it is fairly new, the number of studies on their susceptibility to microbial adhesion is low. Restorations placed even for a short period of time may become the reservoir for microorganisms that may affect the peri-implant tissues and trigger inflammation endangering further procedures. The aim of the study was to test the biofilm formation on acrylamide resins used to fabricate temporary restorations in 3D printing technology and to assess if the post-processing impacts microbial adhesion.

METHODS

Disk-shaped samples were manufactured using the 3D printing technique from three commercially available UV-curable resins consisting of acrylate and methacrylate oligomers with various time and inhibitors of polymerization (NextDent MFH bleach, NextDent 3D Plus, MazicD Temp). The tested samples were raw, polished and glazed. The ability to create biofilm by oral streptococci (S. mutans, S. sanguinis, S. oralis, S. mitis) was tested, as well as species with higher pathogenic potential: Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis and Candida albicans. The roughness of the materials was measured by an atomic force microscope. Biofilm formation was assessed after 72 h of incubation by crystal violet staining with absorbance measurement, quantification of viable microorganisms, and imaging with a scanning electron microscope (SEM).

RESULTS

Each tested species formed the biofilm on the samples of all three resins. Post-production processing resulted in reduced roughness parameters and biofilm abundance. Polishing and glazing reduced roughness parameters significantly in the NextDent resin group, while glazing alone caused significant surface smoothing in Mazic Temp. A thin layer of microbial biofilm covered glazed resin surfaces with a small number of microorganisms for all tested strains except S. oralis and S. epidermidis, while raw and polished surfaces were covered with a dense biofilm, rich in microorganisms.

CONCLUSIONS

UV-curing acrylic resins used for fabricating temporary restorations in the 3D technology are the interim solution, but are susceptible to adhesion and biofilm formation by oral streptococci, staphylococci and Candida. Post-processing and particularly glazing process significantly reduce bacterial biofilm formation and the risk of failure of final restoration.

摘要

背景

在最终修复体完成并交付之前,需要临时植入物保留修复体来维持咀嚼系统的功能和美观。丙烯酸树脂在修复体中被广泛应用,最近也被应用于三维(3D)打印技术。由于这项技术相对较新,研究其对微生物附着的敏感性的研究较少。即使放置时间很短的修复体也可能成为微生物的储存库,这些微生物可能会影响种植体周围组织并引发炎症,从而危及进一步的治疗过程。本研究的目的是测试用于 3D 打印技术制造临时修复体的丙烯酰胺树脂的生物膜形成情况,并评估后处理是否会影响微生物附着。

方法

使用 3D 打印技术,从三种市售的紫外线可固化树脂中制造圆盘状样本,这些树脂由含有丙烯酰胺和甲基丙烯酰胺的低聚物组成,具有不同的聚合时间和抑制剂(NextDent MFH 漂白剂、NextDent 3D Plus、MazicD Temp)。测试样本包括原始样本、抛光样本和上釉样本。通过对口腔链球菌(变形链球菌、血链球菌、口腔链球菌、米勒链球菌)以及具有更高致病性的物种(金黄色葡萄球菌、表皮葡萄球菌和白色念珠菌)进行测试,来评估它们形成生物膜的能力。通过原子力显微镜测量材料的粗糙度。通过结晶紫染色和吸光度测量、活菌定量和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)成像来评估生物膜形成情况,孵育 72 小时后进行检测。

结果

每种测试的物种都在三种树脂的样本上形成了生物膜。生产后处理会降低粗糙度参数和生物膜丰度。抛光和上釉显著降低了 NextDent 树脂组的粗糙度参数,而上釉单独处理会使 MazicTemp 树脂的表面显著变平滑。除了口腔链球菌和表皮葡萄球菌外,涂釉树脂表面覆盖着一层薄薄的微生物生物膜,膜上的微生物数量较少,而原始和抛光表面则覆盖着一层密集的生物膜,富含微生物。

结论

用于 3D 技术制造临时修复体的紫外线固化丙烯酸树脂是一种临时解决方案,但易受口腔链球菌、葡萄球菌和白色念珠菌的附着和生物膜形成的影响。后处理,特别是上釉处理,可显著减少细菌生物膜的形成和最终修复体失败的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd03/9563793/0859b59bea0e/12903_2022_2488_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd03/9563793/13eaaba1be16/12903_2022_2488_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd03/9563793/0859b59bea0e/12903_2022_2488_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd03/9563793/13eaaba1be16/12903_2022_2488_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd03/9563793/0859b59bea0e/12903_2022_2488_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of biofilm formation on acrylic resins used to fabricate dental temporary restorations with the use of 3D printing technology.评价使用 3D 打印技术制作牙科临时修复体的丙烯酸树脂的生物膜形成情况。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Oct 13;22(1):442. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02488-5.
2
Evaluation of surface roughness, wettability and adhesion of multispecies biofilm on 3D-printed resins for the base and teeth of complete dentures.三维打印义齿基托和牙面树脂表面粗糙度、润湿性和多菌种生物膜黏附性的评价。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2024 Apr 19;32:e20230326. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2023-0326. eCollection 2024.
3
Effects of printing orientation and artificial ageing on martens hardness and indentation modulus of 3D printed restorative resin materials.打印方向和人工老化对 3D 打印修复树脂材料的马氏体硬度和压痕模量的影响。
Dent Mater. 2024 Jul;40(7):1003-1014. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2024.05.005. Epub 2024 May 11.
4
Influence of 3D printing system, postpolymerization and aging protocols on resin flexural strength and dimensional stability for printing occlusal splints, models and temporary restorations.3D 打印系统、后聚合和老化方案对用于打印咬合垫、模型和临时修复体的树脂弯曲强度和尺寸稳定性的影响。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Oct 19;28(11):604. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05998-4.
5
Effect of Printing Layer Thickness on Optical Properties and Surface Roughness of 3D-Printed Resins: An In Vitro Study.打印层厚度对 3D 打印树脂光学性能和表面粗糙度的影响:一项体外研究。
Int J Prosthodont. 2024 Feb 21;37(7):165-173. doi: 10.11607/ijp.8965.
6
In vitro comparison of the surface roughness of polymethyl methacrylate and bis-acrylic resins for interim restorations before and after polishing.聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯和双丙烯酸树脂用于临时修复体的表面粗糙度的体外比较,抛光前后。
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 May;125(5):833.e1-833.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.02.009. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
7
The flexural strength of 3D-printed provisional restorations fabricated with different resins: a systematic review and meta-analysis.不同树脂 3D 打印临时修复体的弯曲强度:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jan 10;24(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03826-x.
8
Comparison of material properties and biofilm formation in interim single crowns obtained by 3D printing and conventional methods.3D 打印和传统方法制作的临时单冠的材料性能和生物膜形成比较。
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Jan;127(1):168-172. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.06.026. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
9
Effect of denture-coating composite on Candida albicans biofilm and surface degradation after disinfection protocol.义齿涂层复合材料对白色念珠菌生物膜及消毒方案后表面降解的影响。
Int Dent J. 2016 Apr;66(2):86-92. doi: 10.1111/idj.12212. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
10
Effect of liquid-polish coating on in vivo biofilm accumulation on provisional restorations: part 1.液体抛光涂层对临时修复体体内生物膜积聚的影响:第1部分。
Quintessence Int. 2007 Jul-Aug;38(7):591-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of polishing methods on the physical properties of temporary restorations.抛光方法对临时修复体物理性能的影响。
Odontology. 2025 Sep 15. doi: 10.1007/s10266-025-01191-5.
2
Digital Workflow in Full Mouth Rehabilitation with Immediate Loading, Intraoral Welding and 3D-Printed Reconstructions in a Periodontal Patient: A Case Report.牙周病患者全口义齿即刻负重、口内焊接及3D打印重建的数字化工作流程:病例报告
Reports (MDPI). 2023 Nov 1;6(4):52. doi: 10.3390/reports6040052.
3
Comparison of Color Stability and Surface Roughness of Interim Crowns Fabricated by Conventional, Milling and 3D Printing Methods.

本文引用的文献

1
Water Sorption, Solubility, and Translucency of 3D-Printed Denture Base Resins.3D打印义齿基托树脂的吸水性、溶解性及透明度
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Mar 9;10(3):42. doi: 10.3390/dj10030042.
2
3D-printed resins for provisional dental restorations: Comparison of mechanical and biological properties.用于临时牙修复的 3D 打印树脂:机械性能和生物性能的比较。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022 Jul;34(5):804-815. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12888. Epub 2022 Feb 20.
3
The Biological Effects of 3D Resins Used in Orthodontics: A Systematic Review.正畸用3D树脂的生物学效应:一项系统评价
传统、铣削和3D打印方法制作的临时冠的颜色稳定性和表面粗糙度比较
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025 Apr;11(2):e70119. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70119.
4
The Effect of Manufacturing Factors on the Material Properties and Adhesion of and on Additive Denture Base Material.制造因素对义齿基托材料的材料性能及与[具体物质1]和[具体物质2]的黏附性的影响
Materials (Basel). 2025 Mar 17;18(6):1323. doi: 10.3390/ma18061323.
5
Properties of 3D-Printed resins for interim restorations: effects of printing and post-curing protocols.用于临时修复体的3D打印树脂特性:打印和后固化方案的影响
Braz Oral Res. 2025 Feb 21;39:e019. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2025.vol39.019. eCollection 2025.
6
Next-Generation Dental Materials: Exploring Bacterial Biofilm Formation on 3D-Printable Resin-Based Composites.下一代牙科材料:探索基于3D可打印树脂复合材料上细菌生物膜的形成
J Funct Biomater. 2025 Jan 3;16(1):12. doi: 10.3390/jfb16010012.
7
Comparative Evaluation of Biofilm Formation on Temporization Crown Materials Used in the Rehabilitation of Primary Dentition With Different Polishing Materials: An In Vitro Study.不同抛光材料用于乳牙修复时临时冠材料上生物膜形成的比较评价:一项体外研究
Cureus. 2024 Sep 8;16(9):e68944. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68944. eCollection 2024 Sep.
8
Biofilm inhibition of denture cleaning tablets and carvacrol on denture bases produced with different techniques.不同技术制作义齿基托对义齿清洁片和香芹酚的生物膜抑制作用。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Jul 5;28(7):413. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05810-3.
9
[Effect of printing orientation on physical and mechanical properties of 3D printing prosthodontic base resin materials].[打印方向对3D打印口腔修复基托树脂材料物理和力学性能的影响]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Apr 18;56(2):345-351. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2024.02.023.
10
Microbiological evaluation of conjunctival anopthalmic flora after using digital 3D-printed ocular prosthesis compared to conventional one: a randomized clinical trial.使用数字化 3D 打印眼假体与传统眼假体后对结膜无眼球菌群的微生物学评估:一项随机临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Dec 18;23(1):1012. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03746-w.
Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Jan 3;9(1):15. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9010015.
4
Personalized, 3D- printed fracture fixation plates versus commonly used orthopedic implant materials- biomaterials characteristics and bacterial biofilm formation.个性化、3D 打印骨折固定板与常用骨科植入材料的比较——生物材料特性和细菌生物膜形成。
Injury. 2022 Mar;53(3):938-946. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.12.020. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
5
Flexural strength and impact strength of heat-cured acrylic and 3D printed denture base resins- A comparative in vitro study.热固化丙烯酸树脂和3D打印义齿基托树脂的弯曲强度与冲击强度——一项体外对比研究。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2022 Jan-Feb;12(1):1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2021.09.018. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
6
3D-Printed vs. Heat-Polymerizing and Autopolymerizing Denture Base Acrylic Resins.3D打印义齿基托丙烯酸树脂与热聚合及自聚合义齿基托丙烯酸树脂的对比
Materials (Basel). 2021 Oct 3;14(19):5781. doi: 10.3390/ma14195781.
7
Influence of the Manufacturing Method on the Adhesion of and to Oral Splint Resins.制造方法对[具体物质1]和[具体物质2]与口腔夹板树脂黏附性的影响
Polymers (Basel). 2021 May 11;13(10):1534. doi: 10.3390/polym13101534.
8
Presence of non-oral bacteria in the oral cavity.口腔中非口腔细菌的存在。
Arch Microbiol. 2021 Aug;203(6):2747-2760. doi: 10.1007/s00203-021-02300-y. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
9
Interferes with Streptococci Spatial Distribution and with Protein Expression of Species within a Polymicrobial Oral Biofilm.干扰口腔多微生物生物膜中链球菌的空间分布及物种的蛋白质表达。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Jan 26;10(2):116. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10020116.
10
Surface Modification Techniques of Titanium and its Alloys to Functionally Optimize Their Biomedical Properties: Thematic Review.钛及其合金的表面改性技术以功能优化其生物医学性能:专题综述
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020 Nov 11;8:603072. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.603072. eCollection 2020.