• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种基于强化学习的数字健康干预措施促进乳房X光检查的可行性:回顾性单臂观察性研究。

Feasibility of a Reinforcement Learning-Enabled Digital Health Intervention to Promote Mammograms: Retrospective, Single-Arm, Observational Study.

作者信息

Bucher Amy, Blazek E Susanne, West Ashley B

机构信息

Lirio, Knoxville, TN, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2022 Nov 28;6(11):e42343. doi: 10.2196/42343.

DOI:10.2196/42343
PMID:36441579
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9745647/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Preventive screenings such as mammograms promote health and detect disease. However, mammogram attendance lags clinical guidelines, with roughly one-quarter of women not completing their recommended mammograms. A scalable digital health intervention leveraging behavioral science and reinforcement learning and delivered via email was implemented in a US health system to promote uptake of recommended mammograms among patients who were 1 or more years overdue for the screening (ie, 2 or more years from last mammogram).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to establish the feasibility of a reinforcement learning-enabled mammography digital health intervention delivered via email. The research aims included understanding the intervention's reach and ability to elicit behavioral outcomes of scheduling and attending mammograms, as well as understanding reach and behavioral outcomes for women of different ages, races, educational attainment levels, and household incomes.

METHODS

The digital health intervention was implemented in a large Catholic health system in the Midwestern United States and targeted the system's existing patients who had not received a recommended mammogram in 2 or more years. From August 2020 to July 2022, 139,164 eligible women received behavioral science-based email messages assembled and delivered by a reinforcement learning model to encourage clinically recommended mammograms. Target outcome behaviors included scheduling and ultimately attending the mammogram appointment.

RESULTS

In total, 139,164 women received at least one intervention email during the study period, and 81.52% engaged with at least one email. Deliverability of emails exceeded 98%. Among message recipients, 24.99% scheduled mammograms and 22.02% attended mammograms (88.08% attendance rate among women who scheduled appointments). Results indicate no practical differences in the frequency at which people engage with the intervention or take action following a message based on their age, race, educational attainment, or household income, suggesting the intervention may equitably drive mammography across diverse populations.

CONCLUSIONS

The reinforcement learning-enabled email intervention is feasible to implement in a health system to engage patients who are overdue for their mammograms to schedule and attend a recommended screening. In this feasibility study, the intervention was associated with scheduling and attending mammograms for patients who were significantly overdue for recommended screening. Moreover, the intervention showed proportionate reach across demographic subpopulations. This suggests that the intervention may be effective at engaging patients of many different backgrounds who are overdue for screening. Future research will establish the effectiveness of this type of intervention compared to typical health system outreach to patients who have not had recommended screenings as well as identify ways to enhance its reach and impact.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb03/9745647/8b2e5019e187/formative_v6i11e42343_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb03/9745647/4ca1306c4aef/formative_v6i11e42343_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb03/9745647/fa5d3dbeac9f/formative_v6i11e42343_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb03/9745647/8b2e5019e187/formative_v6i11e42343_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb03/9745647/4ca1306c4aef/formative_v6i11e42343_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb03/9745647/fa5d3dbeac9f/formative_v6i11e42343_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb03/9745647/8b2e5019e187/formative_v6i11e42343_fig3.jpg
摘要

背景

乳房X光检查等预防性筛查可促进健康并检测疾病。然而,乳房X光检查的参与率未达临床指南要求,约四分之一的女性未完成推荐的乳房X光检查。美国一个医疗系统实施了一项可扩展的数字健康干预措施,该措施利用行为科学和强化学习,并通过电子邮件提供,以促进那些筛查逾期一年或更长时间(即距离上次乳房X光检查已过去两年或更长时间)的患者接受推荐的乳房X光检查。

目的

本研究的目的是确定通过电子邮件提供的、基于强化学习的乳房X光检查数字健康干预措施的可行性。研究目标包括了解该干预措施的覆盖范围以及引发乳房X光检查预约和就诊行为结果的能力,同时了解不同年龄、种族、教育程度和家庭收入的女性的覆盖范围和行为结果。

方法

该数字健康干预措施在美国中西部的一个大型天主教医疗系统中实施,目标是该系统中已有两年或更长时间未接受推荐乳房X光检查的现有患者。从2020年8月到2022年7月,139,164名符合条件的女性收到了由强化学习模型组装并发送的基于行为科学的电子邮件,以鼓励她们接受临床推荐的乳房X光检查。目标结果行为包括预约并最终参加乳房X光检查预约。

结果

在研究期间,共有139,164名女性至少收到一封干预电子邮件,其中81.52%的女性与至少一封电子邮件进行了互动。电子邮件的可投递率超过98%。在信息接收者中,24.99%的人预约了乳房X光检查,22.02%的人参加了乳房X光检查(在预约的女性中,就诊率为88.08%)。结果表明,不同年龄、种族、教育程度或家庭收入的人在与干预措施互动或收到信息后采取行动的频率上没有实际差异,这表明该干预措施可能公平地推动不同人群进行乳房X光检查。

结论

在医疗系统中实施基于强化学习的电子邮件干预措施,以促使逾期未进行乳房X光检查的患者预约并参加推荐的筛查是可行的。在这项可行性研究中,该干预措施与为严重逾期未进行推荐筛查的患者预约和参加乳房X光检查相关。此外,该干预措施在各人口亚群体中的覆盖范围相当。这表明该干预措施可能有效地促使许多不同背景、逾期未进行筛查的患者参与进来。未来的研究将确定这种干预措施与针对未接受推荐筛查患者的典型医疗系统外展服务相比的有效性,并确定提高其覆盖范围和影响的方法。

相似文献

1
Feasibility of a Reinforcement Learning-Enabled Digital Health Intervention to Promote Mammograms: Retrospective, Single-Arm, Observational Study.一种基于强化学习的数字健康干预措施促进乳房X光检查的可行性:回顾性单臂观察性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Nov 28;6(11):e42343. doi: 10.2196/42343.
2
The Effect of Automated Mammogram Orders Paired With Electronic Invitations to Self-schedule on Mammogram Scheduling Outcomes: Observational Cohort Comparison.自动乳房X光检查订单与电子邀请自我预约相结合对乳房X光检查预约结果的影响:观察性队列比较。
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Dec 7;9(12):e27072. doi: 10.2196/27072.
3
4
Implementation and process evaluation of three interventions to promote screening mammograms delivered for 4 years in a large primary care population.在一大群初级保健人群中实施并进行过程评估的三种促进乳腺钼靶筛查干预措施,为期4年。
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Sep;7(3):547-556. doi: 10.1007/s13142-017-0497-x.
5
Screening mammography for women aged 40 to 49 years at average risk for breast cancer: an evidence-based analysis.针对40至49岁患乳腺癌平均风险女性的乳腺钼靶筛查:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2007;7(1):1-32. Epub 2007 Jan 1.
6
The Framing Effect of Digital Textual Messages on Uptake Rates of Medical Checkups: Field Study.数字文本信息对体检参与率的框架效应:现场研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Mar 6;10:e45379. doi: 10.2196/45379.
7
Impact of Phone-Call and Access-Enhancing Intervention on Mammography Uptake among Primary Care Patients at an Urban Safety-Net Hospital: A Randomized Controlled Study.城市医疗服务定点医院中基于电话随访和增强服务的干预对初级护理患者接受乳房 X 光检查的影响:一项随机对照研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Nov;27(12):4643-4649. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08884-x. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
8
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
9
Effect of false-positive mammograms on interval breast cancer screening in a health maintenance organization.乳腺X线摄影假阳性对健康维护组织中乳腺癌间期筛查的影响。
Ann Intern Med. 1999 Jul 6;131(1):1-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-131-1-199907060-00002.
10
Efficacy of a simple, low-cost educational intervention in improving knowledge about risks and benefits of screening mammography.一项简单、低成本的教育干预措施在提高乳腺钼靶筛查风险和益处相关知识方面的效果。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2006 Jun;81(6):783-91. doi: 10.4065/81.6.783.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence in Health Promotion and Disease Reduction: Rapid Review.健康促进与疾病预防中的人工智能:快速综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 1;27:e70381. doi: 10.2196/70381.
2
Organizational Determinants, Outcomes Related to Participation and Adherence to Cancer Public Health Screening: A Systematic Review.组织决定因素、与癌症公共卫生筛查参与和依从性相关的结果:一项系统综述。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 May 26;17(11):1775. doi: 10.3390/cancers17111775.
3
How are Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Used in Digital Behavior Change Interventions? A Scoping Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Personalized Digital Health Communications to Increase COVID-19 Vaccination in Underserved Populations: A Double Diamond Approach to Behavioral Design.个性化数字健康通信以提高弱势群体的新冠疫苗接种率:行为设计的双钻石方法
Front Digit Health. 2022 Apr 15;4:831093. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.831093. eCollection 2022.
2
Estimation of Breast Cancer Overdiagnosis in a U.S. Breast Screening Cohort.美国乳腺筛查队列中乳腺癌过度诊断的评估。
Ann Intern Med. 2022 Apr;175(4):471-478. doi: 10.7326/M21-3577. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
3
Text Message Medication Adherence Reminders Automated and Delivered at Scale Across Two Institutions: Testing the Nudge System: Pilot Study.
机器学习和人工智能如何用于数字行为改变干预?一项范围综述。
Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2024 May 22;2(3):375-404. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpdig.2024.05.007. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
How to design equitable digital health tools: A narrative review of design tactics, case studies, and opportunities.如何设计公平的数字健康工具:对设计策略、案例研究及机遇的叙述性综述
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Aug 22;3(8):e0000591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000591. eCollection 2024 Aug.
5
Leveraging behavioral science and artificial intelligence to support mental health in the workplace: a pilot study.利用行为科学和人工智能来支持职场心理健康:一项试点研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Oct 19;14:1219229. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1219229. eCollection 2023.
短信药物依从性提醒在两个机构大规模自动发送:测试推动系统:试点研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021 May;14(5):e007015. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.007015. Epub 2021 May 17.
4
Use of Selected Recommended Clinical Preventive Services - Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2018.推荐的临床预防服务的使用情况 - 行为风险因素监测系统,美国,2018 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Apr 2;70(13):461-466. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7013a1.
5
Racial differences in no-show rates for screening mammography.种族差异对筛查性乳房 X 光检查的不就诊率的影响。
Cancer. 2021 Jun 1;127(11):1857-1863. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33435. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
6
Changes in Mammography Use by Women's Characteristics During the First 5 Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic.COVID-19 大流行的头 5 个月期间,女性特征对乳房 X 光检查使用的变化。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Sep 4;113(9):1161-1167. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djab045.
7
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
8
The Expanding Digital Divide: Digital Health Access Inequities during the COVID-19 Pandemic in New York City.不断扩大的数字鸿沟:纽约市新冠疫情期间数字健康获取的不平等现象
J Urban Health. 2021 Apr;98(2):183-186. doi: 10.1007/s11524-020-00508-9. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
9
Artificial Intelligence and Behavioral Science Through the Looking Glass: Challenges for Real-World Application.人工智能与行为科学:从“魔镜”中看现实世界的应用挑战。
Ann Behav Med. 2020 Dec 1;54(12):942-947. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaaa095.
10
Effects of a Tailored Text Messaging Intervention Among Diverse Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: Evidence From the 15-Month REACH Randomized Controlled Trial.基于 15 个月 REACH 随机对照试验的研究:个体化短信干预对不同类型 2 型糖尿病患者的影响。
Diabetes Care. 2021 Jan;44(1):26-34. doi: 10.2337/dc20-0961. Epub 2020 Nov 5.