Muzyka-Woźniak Maria, Oleszko Adam, Grzybowski Andrzej
Ophthalmology Clinical Center SPEKTRUM, Zaolzianska Str. 4, 53-334 Wroclaw, Poland.
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Zołnierska Str. 18, 10-561 Olsztyn, Poland.
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 24;11(23):6921. doi: 10.3390/jcm11236921.
Background: Posterior keratometry measurements are evolving features of the optical biometers. The differences between devices have bigger impact for the low astigmatism values. The majority of adults present the corneal astigmatism below 1.5 D. Objectives: To compare the total corneal astigmatism measured with two different technologies in cataract patients with corneal astigmatism below 1.5 D. Material and Methods: Three automated exams were performed on each of the two devices: swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) and Scheimpflug biometers. The anterior and total corneal astigmatism and power were analysed. Statistical comparisons were performed for within-subject standard deviation, repeatability, Bland−Altman and vector analysis. Results: Twenty-nine eyes of twenty-seven patients were included. The limits of agreement between anterior and total corneal astigmatism were narrower for the SS-OCT than for the Scheimpflug biometer (−0.16 to 0.29 D and −0.40 to 0.39 D, respectively). The >0.5 D difference between SS-OCT and Scheimpflug total astigmatism was noticed in 5 (17%) of cases. The difference between mean total keratometric power for both devices was statistically significant (0.2 D, p < 0.001). SS-OCT total corneal flat measurements had worse repeatability than Scheimpflug (p = 0.007). Conclusions: For the corneal astigmatism <1.5 D, the difference between anterior and total corneal astigmatism measured with SS-OCT was clinically not significant. The mean anterior and total keratometry values obtained with Scheimpflug and SS-OCT biometers are not interchangeable.
角膜后表面曲率测量是光学生物测量仪不断发展的特性。不同设备之间的差异对低散光值的影响更大。大多数成年人的角膜散光低于1.5 D。目的:比较两种不同技术测量的角膜散光低于1.5 D的白内障患者的总角膜散光。材料与方法:对两种设备(扫频光学相干断层扫描(SS-OCT)和Scheimpflug生物测量仪)分别进行三项自动检查。分析前角膜散光和总角膜散光及屈光力。进行了受试者内标准差、重复性、Bland-Altman分析和矢量分析的统计比较。结果:纳入了27例患者的29只眼。SS-OCT测量的前角膜散光和总角膜散光之间的一致性界限比Scheimpflug生物测量仪更窄(分别为-0.16至0.29 D和-0.40至0.39 D)。5例(17%)病例中发现SS-OCT和Scheimpflug总散光之间的差异>0.5 D。两种设备的平均总角膜屈光力差异具有统计学意义(0.2 D,p<0.001)。SS-OCT总角膜平坦测量的重复性比Scheimpflug测量差(p = 0.007)。结论:对于角膜散光<1.5 D,SS-OCT测量的前角膜散光和总角膜散光之间的差异在临床上无显著意义。Scheimpflug和SS-OCT生物测量仪获得的平均前角膜曲率和总角膜曲率值不可互换。