• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于多指标倾向评分的平均处理效应估计。

Estimation of average treatment effect based on a multi-index propensity score.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety of Ministry of Education, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Dec 28;22(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01822-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12874-022-01822-3
PMID:36577950
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9795597/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Estimating the average effect of a treatment, exposure, or intervention on health outcomes is a primary aim of many medical studies. However, unbalanced covariates between groups can lead to confounding bias when using observational data to estimate the average treatment effect (ATE). In this study, we proposed an estimator to correct confounding bias and provide multiple protection for estimation consistency.

METHODS

With reference to the kernel function-based double-index propensity score (Ker.DiPS) estimator, we proposed the artificial neural network-based multi-index propensity score (ANN.MiPS) estimator. The ANN.MiPS estimator employed the artificial neural network to estimate the MiPS that combines the information from multiple candidate models for propensity score and outcome regression. A Monte Carlo simulation study was designed to evaluate the performance of the proposed ANN.MiPS estimator. Furthermore, we applied our estimator to real data to discuss its practicability.

RESULTS

The simulation study showed the bias of the ANN.MiPS estimators is very small and the standard error is similar if any one of the candidate models is correctly specified under all evaluated sample sizes, treatment rates, and covariate types. Compared to the kernel function-based estimator, the ANN.MiPS estimator usually yields smaller standard error when the correct model is incorporated in the estimator. The empirical study indicated the point estimation for ATE and its bootstrap standard error of the ANN.MiPS estimator is stable under different model specifications.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed estimator extended the combination of information from two models to multiple models and achieved multiply robust estimation for ATE. Extra efficiency was gained by our estimator compared to the kernel-based estimator. The proposed estimator provided a novel approach for estimating the causal effects in observational studies.

摘要

背景

估计治疗、暴露或干预对健康结果的平均效果是许多医学研究的主要目标。然而,当使用观察数据估计平均治疗效果(ATE)时,组间不平衡的协变量会导致混杂偏差。在这项研究中,我们提出了一种估计器来纠正混杂偏差,并为估计一致性提供多重保护。

方法

我们参考基于核函数的双索引倾向评分(Ker.DiPS)估计量,提出了基于人工神经网络的多索引倾向评分(ANN.MiPS)估计量。ANN.MiPS 估计量使用人工神经网络来估计 MiPS,该 MiPS 结合了来自多个候选倾向评分和结果回归模型的信息。设计了蒙特卡罗模拟研究来评估所提出的 ANN.MiPS 估计量的性能。此外,我们将我们的估计器应用于真实数据,以讨论其实用性。

结果

模拟研究表明,在所有评估的样本大小、治疗率和协变量类型下,如果任何一个候选模型正确指定,ANN.MiPS 估计量的偏差非常小,标准误差也相似。与基于核函数的估计量相比,当正确模型被纳入估计量时,ANN.MiPS 估计量通常会产生更小的标准误差。实证研究表明,在不同的模型规格下,ANN.MiPS 估计量的 ATE 点估计及其引导标准误差是稳定的。

结论

所提出的估计器将来自两个模型的信息扩展到多个模型,并实现了 ATE 的多重稳健估计。与基于核的估计器相比,我们的估计器获得了额外的效率。所提出的估计器为观察性研究中的因果效应估计提供了一种新方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94c3/9795597/d972036d1a04/12874_2022_1822_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94c3/9795597/d972036d1a04/12874_2022_1822_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94c3/9795597/d972036d1a04/12874_2022_1822_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Estimation of average treatment effect based on a multi-index propensity score.基于多指标倾向评分的平均处理效应估计。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Dec 28;22(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01822-3.
2
Multiply robust estimator for the difference in survival functions using pseudo-observations.使用伪观测值的生存函数差异的多重稳健估计量。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Oct 23;23(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-02065-6.
3
Double Robust Efficient Estimators of Longitudinal Treatment Effects: Comparative Performance in Simulations and a Case Study.纵向治疗效果的双重稳健有效估计量:模拟中的比较性能及一个案例研究
Int J Biostat. 2019 Feb 26;15(2):/j/ijb.2019.15.issue-2/ijb-2017-0054/ijb-2017-0054.xml. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2017-0054.
4
Comparison of the ability of double-robust estimators to correct bias in propensity score matching analysis. A Monte Carlo simulation study.双重稳健估计在倾向评分匹配分析中校正偏差的能力比较。一项蒙特卡罗模拟研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017 Dec;26(12):1513-1519. doi: 10.1002/pds.4325. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
5
Prognostic score-based model averaging approach for propensity score estimation.基于预后评分的模型平均倾向评分估计方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Oct 3;24(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02350-y.
6
Model misspecification and bias for inverse probability weighting estimators of average causal effects.模型误设定和平均因果效应逆概率加权估计的偏差。
Biom J. 2023 Feb;65(2):e2100118. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202100118. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
7
Improving causal inference with a doubly robust estimator that combines propensity score stratification and weighting.利用结合倾向评分分层和加权的双重稳健估计器改进因果推断。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Aug;23(4):697-702. doi: 10.1111/jep.12714. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
8
Parallelized ultrasound homodyned-K imaging based on a generalized artificial neural network estimator.基于广义人工神经网络估计器的并行超声同源 K 成像。
Ultrasonics. 2023 Jul;132:106987. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2023.106987. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
9
Variance estimators for weighted and stratified linear dose-response function estimators using generalized propensity score.使用广义倾向得分的加权和分层线性剂量反应函数估计器的方差估计量。
Biom J. 2022 Jan;64(1):33-56. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202000267. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
10
Stratified doubly robust estimators for the average causal effect.平均因果效应的分层双稳健估计量。
Biometrics. 2014 Jun;70(2):270-7. doi: 10.1111/biom.12157. Epub 2014 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Matching plus regression adjustment for the estimation of the average treatment effect on survival outcomes: a case study with mosunetuzumab in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma.用于估计生存结局平均治疗效果的匹配加回归调整:以莫苏奈妥珠单抗治疗复发/难治性滤泡性淋巴瘤为例
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Feb 1;25(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02456-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Estimating average treatment effects with a double-index propensity score.用双指标倾向得分估计平均治疗效果。
Biometrics. 2020 Sep;76(3):767-777. doi: 10.1111/biom.13195. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
2
Principles of confounder selection.混杂因素选择原则。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2019 Mar;34(3):211-219. doi: 10.1007/s10654-019-00494-6. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
3
Estimating Individual Treatment Effect in Observational Data Using Random Forest Methods.使用随机森林方法估计观察性数据中的个体治疗效果。
J Comput Graph Stat. 2018;27(1):209-219. doi: 10.1080/10618600.2017.1356325. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
4
Points of Significance: Machine learning: a primer.要点:机器学习:入门。
Nat Methods. 2017 Nov 30;14(12):1119-1120. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4526.
5
Observational studies versus randomized controlled trials: avenues to causal inference in nephrology.观察性研究与随机对照试验:肾脏病学中因果推断的途径。
Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2012 Jan;19(1):11-8. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2011.09.004.
6
Improving propensity score weighting using machine learning.使用机器学习改进倾向评分加权。
Stat Med. 2010 Feb 10;29(3):337-46. doi: 10.1002/sim.3782.
7
Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples.平衡诊断用于比较倾向评分匹配样本中治疗组间基线协变量的分布。
Stat Med. 2009 Nov 10;28(25):3083-107. doi: 10.1002/sim.3697.
8
Evaluating uses of data mining techniques in propensity score estimation: a simulation study.评估数据挖掘技术在倾向评分估计中的应用:一项模拟研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008 Jun;17(6):546-55. doi: 10.1002/pds.1555.
9
Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: a comparative study.在因果治疗效果估计中通过倾向得分进行分层和加权:一项比较研究。
Stat Med. 2004 Oct 15;23(19):2937-60. doi: 10.1002/sim.1903.