Suppr超能文献

多层次多部门政治体系中地区公平性的政策设计:健康与教育策略比较

Policy design for territorial equity in multi-level and multi-sectoral political systems: Comparing health and education strategies.

作者信息

Cairney Paul, Kippin Sean, St Denny Emily, Mitchell Heather

机构信息

University of Stirling - History, Heritage, and Politics UK.

Department of Political Science University of Copenhagen Denmark.

出版信息

Reg Sci Policy Prac. 2022 Oct;14(5):1051-1061. doi: 10.1111/rsp3.12466. Epub 2021 Sep 21.

Abstract

The EU has many plans to foster equity and spatial justice. However, each has separate reference points, and it is difficult to find an overall vision. To demonstrate, we analyse two sectoral strategies to identify their implications for spatial justice strategies. Education focuses on early investment and public service reform. Health prioritises intersectoral action to address the 'social determinants' beyond the control of health services. Both warn against equating territorial cohesion or spatial justice with equal access to public services. These findings could inform European Commission strategy, but it tends to respond with renewed rhetoric rather than reconsidering its approach.

摘要

欧盟有许多促进公平和空间正义的计划。然而,每个计划都有各自的参考点,很难找到一个整体愿景。为了说明这一点,我们分析两项部门战略,以确定它们对空间正义战略的影响。教育侧重于早期投资和公共服务改革。卫生部门将跨部门行动作为优先事项,以解决卫生服务无法控制的“社会决定因素”。两者都警告不要将领土凝聚力或空间正义等同于平等获得公共服务。这些发现可为欧盟委员会的战略提供参考,但欧盟委员会往往只是再次发表言辞,而不是重新考虑其方法。

相似文献

5
6

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验