Cairney Paul, Kippin Sean, St Denny Emily, Mitchell Heather
University of Stirling - History, Heritage, and Politics UK.
Department of Political Science University of Copenhagen Denmark.
Reg Sci Policy Prac. 2022 Oct;14(5):1051-1061. doi: 10.1111/rsp3.12466. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
The EU has many plans to foster equity and spatial justice. However, each has separate reference points, and it is difficult to find an overall vision. To demonstrate, we analyse two sectoral strategies to identify their implications for spatial justice strategies. Education focuses on early investment and public service reform. Health prioritises intersectoral action to address the 'social determinants' beyond the control of health services. Both warn against equating territorial cohesion or spatial justice with equal access to public services. These findings could inform European Commission strategy, but it tends to respond with renewed rhetoric rather than reconsidering its approach.
欧盟有许多促进公平和空间正义的计划。然而,每个计划都有各自的参考点,很难找到一个整体愿景。为了说明这一点,我们分析两项部门战略,以确定它们对空间正义战略的影响。教育侧重于早期投资和公共服务改革。卫生部门将跨部门行动作为优先事项,以解决卫生服务无法控制的“社会决定因素”。两者都警告不要将领土凝聚力或空间正义等同于平等获得公共服务。这些发现可为欧盟委员会的战略提供参考,但欧盟委员会往往只是再次发表言辞,而不是重新考虑其方法。