• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共享单车对新冠疫情的应对措施。

Bike share responses to COVID-19.

作者信息

Jobe Jeffrey, Griffin Greg P

机构信息

Department of Architecture, The University of Texas at San Antonio, 78207, USA.

出版信息

Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2021 Jun;10:100353. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2021.100353. Epub 2021 Mar 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.trip.2021.100353
PMID:36844003
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9940611/
Abstract

Bike sharing can leverage its physical distancing advantages for responding to the COVID-19 pandemic, but system management and communication are essential to support healthy transportation. This study addresses the need to understand the range of bike share systems' responses to the pandemic by reviewing bike share system cases in the United States and reports survey responses from bike share users in San Antonio (TX). Five out of eleven bike share systems communicated their responses to the pandemic online at the time of review. 43% of survey respondents who were unemployed due to the pandemic reported increasing use of the bike share system, whereas 36% of employed respondents decreased ridership. Most respondents were unaware of the bike share operator's steps to control the spread of COVID-19 for users. Moderate-frequency riders (1-2 times per month) may increase bike sharing the most after Coronavirus restrictions are lifted, from 22% of respondents to 34%. Based on our findings, we suggest bike share operators should expand communication efforts about policies and actions to support community health, explore how to serve unemployed and low-income communities best, and prepare for the equitable expansion of ridership following the pandemic.

摘要

共享单车可以利用其保持身体距离的优势来应对新冠疫情,但系统管理和沟通对于支持健康出行至关重要。本研究通过回顾美国共享单车系统案例,探讨了解共享单车系统对疫情的应对范围的必要性,并报告了德克萨斯州圣安东尼奥市共享单车用户的调查反馈。在审查时,11个共享单车系统中有5个在网上公布了它们对疫情的应对措施。因疫情失业的受访者中有43%表示增加了对共享单车系统的使用,而有工作的受访者中有36%减少了骑行次数。大多数受访者并不了解共享单车运营商为用户控制新冠病毒传播所采取的措施。中等骑行频率(每月1 - 2次)的用户在新冠疫情限制解除后可能增加共享单车使用的幅度最大,从22%的受访者增加到34%。基于我们的研究结果,我们建议共享单车运营商应加大关于支持社区健康的政策和行动的宣传力度,探索如何更好地服务失业和低收入社区,并为疫情后乘客数量的公平增长做好准备。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eda7/9940611/d87d62729f76/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eda7/9940611/d87d62729f76/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eda7/9940611/d87d62729f76/gr1_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Bike share responses to COVID-19.共享单车对新冠疫情的应对措施。
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2021 Jun;10:100353. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2021.100353. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
2
Examining the causal relationship between bike-share and public transit in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.研究新冠疫情期间共享单车与公共交通之间的因果关系。
Cities. 2022 Dec;131:104024. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104024. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
3
The role of bike sharing during the coronavirus pandemic: An analysis of the mobility patterns and perceptions of Lisbon's users.新冠疫情期间共享单车的作用:对里斯本用户出行模式及看法的分析
Transp Res Part A Policy Pract. 2022 May;159:17-34. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2022.03.018. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
4
Impacts of COVID-19 on Bike-Share Usage: The case of Daejeon, Korea.新冠疫情对共享单车使用情况的影响:以韩国大田市为例。
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2023 Jun 9:100856. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2023.100856.
5
The link between bike sharing and subway use during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case-study of New York's Citi Bike.新冠疫情期间共享单车与地铁使用之间的联系:纽约花旗单车的案例研究
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020 Jul;6:100166. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100166. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
6
Determining factors affecting public bike ridership and its spatial change before and after COVID-19.确定影响新冠疫情前后公共自行车出行率及其空间变化的因素。
Travel Behav Soc. 2023 Apr;31:24-36. doi: 10.1016/j.tbs.2022.11.002. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
7
Should bike-sharing continue operating during the COVID-19 pandemic? Empirical findings from Nanjing, China.在新冠疫情期间共享单车是否应继续运营?来自中国南京的实证研究结果。
J Transp Health. 2021 Dec;23:101264. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2021.101264. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
8
Impacts of COVID-19 on bike-sharing usages in Seoul, South Korea.新冠疫情对韩国首尔共享单车使用情况的影响。
Cities. 2022 Nov;130:103849. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103849. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
9
A long-term perspective on the COVID-19: The bike sharing system resilience under the epidemic environment.对新冠疫情的长期展望:疫情环境下共享单车系统的恢复力
J Transp Health. 2022 Sep;26:101460. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2022.101460. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
10
Bike Share Usage and the Built Environment: A Review.自行车共享使用与建成环境:综述。
Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 21;10:848169. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.848169. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the spatiotemporal factors affecting bicycle-sharing demand during the COVID-19 pandemic.探索新冠疫情期间影响共享单车需求的时空因素。
Transportation (Amst). 2023 Mar 14:1-36. doi: 10.1007/s11116-023-10378-0.
2
Impacts of COVID-19 on Bike-Share Usage: The case of Daejeon, Korea.新冠疫情对共享单车使用情况的影响:以韩国大田市为例。
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2023 Jun 9:100856. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2023.100856.
3
Changes in public bike usage after the COVID-19 outbreak: A survey of Seoul public bike sharing users.

本文引用的文献

1
Bike-Sharing Station Usage and the Surrounding Built Environments in Major Texas Cities.德克萨斯州主要城市的共享单车车站使用情况与周边建成环境
J Plan Educ Res. 2023 Mar;43(1):122-135. doi: 10.1177/0739456x19862854. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
2
The link between bike sharing and subway use during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case-study of New York's Citi Bike.新冠疫情期间共享单车与地铁使用之间的联系:纽约花旗单车的案例研究
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020 Jul;6:100166. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100166. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
3
COVID-19 effects on shared-biking in New York, Boston, and Chicago.
新冠疫情爆发后公共自行车使用情况的变化:一项对首尔公共自行车共享用户的调查。
Sustain Cities Soc. 2023 Sep;96:104716. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104716. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
4
Shared E-Scooter Trajectory Analysis During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Austin, Texas.德克萨斯州奥斯汀市新冠疫情期间共享电动滑板车轨迹分析
Transp Res Rec. 2023 Apr;2677(4):432-447. doi: 10.1177/03611981221083306. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
5
When crisis hits: Bike-Sharing platforms amid the Covid-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间的共享单车:危机来袭
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 7;18(4):e0283603. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283603. eCollection 2023.
6
Exploring the potential role of bikeshare to complement public transit: The case of San Francisco amid the coronavirus crisis.探索共享单车对公共交通的补充作用:以新冠疫情危机下的旧金山为例。
Cities. 2023 Jun;137:104290. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104290. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
7
Estimating Mode of Transport in Daily Mobility during the COVID-19 Pandemic Using a Multinomial Logistic Regression Model.使用多项逻辑回归模型估算 COVID-19 大流行期间日常出行中的交通方式。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 5;20(5):4600. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054600.
8
Determining factors affecting public bike ridership and its spatial change before and after COVID-19.确定影响新冠疫情前后公共自行车出行率及其空间变化的因素。
Travel Behav Soc. 2023 Apr;31:24-36. doi: 10.1016/j.tbs.2022.11.002. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
9
Travel patterns of free-floating e-bike-sharing users before and during COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情之前及期间自由浮动式电动自行车共享用户的出行模式。
Cities. 2023 Jan;132:104065. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104065. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
10
The disparate impact of COVID-19 pandemic on walking and biking behaviors.新冠疫情对步行和骑行行为的不同影响。
Transp Res D Transp Environ. 2022 Nov;112:103494. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2022.103494. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
新冠疫情对纽约、波士顿和芝加哥共享单车的影响。
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2021 Mar;9:100282. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100282. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
4
Socially optimal lockdown and travel restrictions for fighting communicable virus including COVID-19.抗击包括新冠病毒在内的传染性病毒的社会最优封锁和出行限制措施。
Transp Policy (Oxf). 2020 Sep;96:94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.07.003. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
5
Public Transit Equity Analysis at Metropolitan and Local Scales: A Focus on Nine Large Cities in the US.大都市和地方尺度的公共交通公平性分析:聚焦美国九个大城市
J Public Trans. 2016;19(4):126-143. doi: 10.5038/2375-0901.19.4.8.
6
Global bike share: What the data tells us about road safety.全球共享单车:数据告诉我们的道路安全情况
J Safety Res. 2016 Feb;56:41-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2015.11.007. Epub 2015 Dec 4.
7
Critical Analysis of Strategies for Determining Rigor in Qualitative Inquiry.定性研究中确定严谨性策略的批判性分析
Qual Health Res. 2015 Sep;25(9):1212-22. doi: 10.1177/1049732315588501. Epub 2015 Jul 16.