• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全科医生的数字成熟度及其衡量:范围综述。

Digital Maturity and Its Measurement of General Practitioners: A Scoping Review.

机构信息

Health Informatics, Faculty of Health/School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, 58455 Witten, Germany.

Department Healthcare, Fraunhofer Institute for Software and Systems Engineering, 44227 Dortmund, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 28;20(5):4377. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054377.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20054377
PMID:36901387
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10001864/
Abstract

The work of general practitioners (GPs) is increasingly characterized by digitalization. Their progress in digitalization can be described by the concept of digital maturity and measured using maturity models. The aim of this scoping review is to provide an overview of the state of research on digital maturity and its measurement in primary care, specifically for GPs. The scoping review was conducted according to Arksey and O'Malley, considering the reporting scheme for PRISMA-ScR. For the literature search, we used PubMed and Google Scholar as the main sources of information. A total of 24 international, mostly Anglo-American studies, were identified. The understanding of digital maturity varied widely. In most studies, it was understood in a highly technical way and associated with the adoption of electronic medical records. More recent, but mostly unpublished, studies have attempted to capture overall digital maturity. So far, the understanding of digital maturity of GPs is still very diffuse-the research literature is still in its infancy. Future research should therefore aim to explore the dimensions of digital maturity of GPs to be able to develop a consistent and validated model for measuring digital maturity.

摘要

全科医生(GP)的工作越来越以数字化为特征。他们在数字化方面的进展可以用数字化成熟度的概念来描述,并使用成熟度模型进行衡量。本范围综述的目的是概述初级保健中数字成熟度及其测量的研究现状,特别是针对全科医生。范围综述是根据 Arksey 和 O'Malley 进行的,考虑了 PRISMA-ScR 的报告方案。为了文献检索,我们主要使用 PubMed 和 Google Scholar 作为信息来源。共确定了 24 项国际研究,其中大部分来自英美。对数字成熟度的理解差异很大。在大多数研究中,它被理解为一种高度技术性的方式,并与电子病历的采用相关。最近的,但大多未发表的研究试图捕捉整体的数字成熟度。到目前为止,对全科医生数字成熟度的理解仍然非常分散-研究文献仍处于起步阶段。因此,未来的研究应旨在探索全科医生数字成熟度的维度,以便能够开发出一致和经过验证的数字成熟度衡量模型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48fd/10001864/ea93b7ad8e2e/ijerph-20-04377-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48fd/10001864/6ff3b352f3ab/ijerph-20-04377-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48fd/10001864/ccdc778ae3eb/ijerph-20-04377-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48fd/10001864/788f7979dc80/ijerph-20-04377-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48fd/10001864/ea93b7ad8e2e/ijerph-20-04377-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48fd/10001864/6ff3b352f3ab/ijerph-20-04377-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48fd/10001864/ccdc778ae3eb/ijerph-20-04377-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48fd/10001864/788f7979dc80/ijerph-20-04377-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48fd/10001864/ea93b7ad8e2e/ijerph-20-04377-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Digital Maturity and Its Measurement of General Practitioners: A Scoping Review.全科医生的数字成熟度及其衡量:范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 28;20(5):4377. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054377.
2
Big 5 Personality Traits and Individual- and Practice-Related Characteristics as Influencing Factors of Digital Maturity in General Practices: Quantitative Web-Based Survey Study.大五人格特质与个体及实践相关特征对一般实践中数字化成熟度的影响因素:基于网络的定量调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jan 22;26:e52085. doi: 10.2196/52085.
3
Dimensions and Subcategories of Digital Maturity in General Practice: Qualitative Study.全科医疗中数字成熟度的维度与子类别:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 19;26:e57786. doi: 10.2196/57786.
4
Digital Health Policy and Programs for Hospital Care in Vietnam: Scoping Review.越南医院护理的数字健康政策和项目:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 9;24(2):e32392. doi: 10.2196/32392.
5
Digital Technologies for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention in Older People: Protocol for a Scoping Review.老年人健康促进和疾病预防的数字技术:范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Jul 21;11(7):e37729. doi: 10.2196/37729.
6
The Role of the Installed Base in Information Exchange Among General Practitioners in Germany: Mixed Methods Study.德国全科医生中既有设备基础在信息交流中的作用:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 24;27:e65241. doi: 10.2196/65241.
7
Person-Centeredness in Digital Primary Healthcare Services-A Scoping Review.数字初级医疗保健服务中的以患者为中心——一项范围综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 May 1;11(9):1296. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11091296.
8
Defining Digital Public Health and the Role of Digitization, Digitalization, and Digital Transformation: Scoping Review.定义数字公共卫生以及数字化、数字化和数字化转型的作用:范围综述。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Nov 26;7(11):e30399. doi: 10.2196/30399.
9
Exploring the Use and Implications of AI in Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights: Protocol for a Scoping Review.探索人工智能在性与生殖健康及权利中的应用与影响:一项范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Apr 9;13:e53888. doi: 10.2196/53888.
10
Patient satisfaction and digital health in primary health care: a scoping review protocol.患者满意度与基层医疗中的数字健康:系统评价方案。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 31;12:1357688. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1357688. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital Literacy Training for Digitalization Officers ("Digi-Managers") in Outpatient Medical and Psychotherapeutic Care: Conceptualization and Longitudinal Evaluation of a Certificate Course.门诊医疗和心理治疗护理数字化管理人员(“数字管理人员”)的数字素养培训:证书课程的概念化与纵向评估
JMIR Med Educ. 2025 Aug 29;11:e70843. doi: 10.2196/70843.
2
Service Quality Assessment of Digital Health Solutions in Outpatient Care: Qualitative Item Repository Development Study.门诊护理中数字健康解决方案的服务质量评估:定性项目库开发研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jul 24;9:e68276. doi: 10.2196/68276.
3
Determinants of Digital Health Literacy: International Cross-Sectional Study.

本文引用的文献

1
: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis.一个用于生成符合PRISMA 2020标准流程图的R包和Shiny应用程序,具有交互性以实现优化的数字透明度和开放综合。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 27;18(2):e1230. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1230. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
Remote care in UK general practice: baseline data on 11 case studies.英国全科医疗中的远程护理:11个案例研究的基线数据
NIHR Open Res. 2022 Nov 29;2:47. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13290.2. eCollection 2022.
3
Digital maturity and its determinants in General Practice: A cross-sectional study in 20 countries.
数字健康素养的决定因素:国际横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 30;27:e66631. doi: 10.2196/66631.
4
Dimensions and Subcategories of Digital Maturity in General Practice: Qualitative Study.全科医疗中数字成熟度的维度与子类别:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 19;26:e57786. doi: 10.2196/57786.
5
Big 5 Personality Traits and Individual- and Practice-Related Characteristics as Influencing Factors of Digital Maturity in General Practices: Quantitative Web-Based Survey Study.大五人格特质与个体及实践相关特征对一般实践中数字化成熟度的影响因素:基于网络的定量调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jan 22;26:e52085. doi: 10.2196/52085.
数字成熟度及其在全科医学中的决定因素:20 个国家的横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 13;10:962924. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.962924. eCollection 2022.
4
National Development and Regional Differences in eHealth Maturity in Finnish Public Health Care: Survey Study.芬兰公共卫生保健中电子健康成熟度的国家发展与地区差异:调查研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Aug 12;10(8):e35612. doi: 10.2196/35612.
5
Managing Directors' Perspectives on Digital Maturity in German Hospitals-A Multi-Point Online-Based Survey Study.德国医院数字化成熟度的总经理观点——一项多点在线调查研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 6;19(15):9709. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159709.
6
PRISMA 2020 and PRISMA-S: common questions on tracking records and the flow diagram.PRISMA 2020 和 PRISMA-S:关于追踪记录和流程图的常见问题。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2022 Apr 1;110(2):253-257. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2022.1449.
7
Synthesizing Dimensions of Digital Maturity in Hospitals: Systematic Review.医院数字化成熟度维度的综合:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 30;24(3):e32994. doi: 10.2196/32994.
8
Why do GPs rarely do video consultations? qualitative study in UK general practice.为什么全科医生很少进行视频咨询?英国全科医疗中的定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Apr 28;72(718):e351-e360. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0658. Print 2022 May.
9
Planning and Evaluating Remote Consultation Services: A New Conceptual Framework Incorporating Complexity and Practical Ethics.规划与评估远程会诊服务:一个融合复杂性与实践伦理的新概念框架
Front Digit Health. 2021 Aug 13;3:726095. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.726095. eCollection 2021.
10
Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Patient-Reported Experience Measures Within Evaluation Studies of Telemedicine Applications: Systematic Review.使用患者报告的结局测量和患者报告的体验测量在远程医疗应用评估研究中:系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Nov 17;23(11):e30042. doi: 10.2196/30042.