• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从定性数据到测量工具:患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表(POSAS)3.0 中患者量表开发过程中所做选择的澄清和阐述。

From qualitative data to a measurement instrument: A clarification and elaboration of choices made in the development of the Patient Scale of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) 3.0.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Burn center and Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand surgery, Red Cross Hospital, Beverwijk, the Netherlands; Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand surgery, Amsterdam UMC (location VUmc), Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Association of Dutch Burn centers, Beverwijk, the Netherlands.

Child Health Research Centre, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

Burns. 2023 Nov;49(7):1541-1556. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2023.02.009. Epub 2023 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.burns.2023.02.009
PMID:36914442
Abstract

PURPOSE

To clarify and elaborate on the choices that were made in the development of the Patient Scale of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale 3.0 (POSAS 3.0), based upon the rich information obtained from patients during focus groups and pilot tests.

METHODS

The discussions described in this paper are a reflection of the focus group study and pilot tests that were conducted in order to develop the Patient Scale of the POSAS3.0. The focus groups took place in the Netherlands and Australia and included 45 participants. Pilot tests were performed with 15 participants in Australia, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom.

RESULTS

We discussed the selection, wording and merging of 17 included items. Additionally, the reason for exclusion of 23 characteristics are given.

CONCLUSION

Based upon the unique and rich material of patient input obtained, two versions of the Patient Scale of the POSAS3.0 were developed: the Generic version, and the Linear scar version. The discussions and decisions taken during the development are informative for a good understanding of the POSAS 3.0 and are indispensable as a background for future translations and cross-cultural adaptations.

摘要

目的

根据从焦点小组和试点测试中获得的患者丰富信息,阐明并详细说明患者和观察者疤痕评估量表 3.0 (POSAS 3.0)患者量表开发过程中的选择。

方法

本文所述的讨论反映了为开发 POSAS3.0 的患者量表而进行的焦点小组研究和试点测试。焦点小组在荷兰和澳大利亚举行,共有 45 名参与者。试点测试在澳大利亚、荷兰和英国进行,共有 15 名参与者。

结果

我们讨论了选择、措辞和合并了 17 个包含的项目。此外,还给出了排除 23 个特征的原因。

结论

基于从患者输入中获得的独特而丰富的材料,开发了两种版本的 POSAS3.0 患者量表:通用版本和线性疤痕版本。在开发过程中进行的讨论和决策对于很好地理解 POSAS 3.0 非常有帮助,并且是未来翻译和跨文化适应的必要背景。

相似文献

1
From qualitative data to a measurement instrument: A clarification and elaboration of choices made in the development of the Patient Scale of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) 3.0.从定性数据到测量工具:患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表(POSAS)3.0 中患者量表开发过程中所做选择的澄清和阐述。
Burns. 2023 Nov;49(7):1541-1556. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2023.02.009. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
2
Development of the Patient Scale of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) 3.0: a qualitative study.患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表(POSAS)3.0 患者量表的制定:一项定性研究。
Qual Life Res. 2023 Feb;32(2):583-592. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03244-6. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
3
Predictive validity of short term scar quality on final burn scar outcome using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in patients with minor to moderate burn severity.使用患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表,评估轻度至中度烧伤严重程度患者短期瘢痕质量对最终烧伤瘢痕结局的预测效度。
Burns. 2017 Jun;43(4):715-723. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.10.012. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
4
Rasch Analysis of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in Linear Scars: Suggestions for a Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale v2.1.线性瘢痕患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表的 Rasch 分析:患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表 v2.1 的建议。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Dec;144(6):1073e-1079e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006265.
5
Patient-and observer-reported long-term scar quality of wide local excision scars in melanoma patients.患者及观察者报告的黑色素瘤患者广泛局部切除瘢痕的长期瘢痕质量
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2018 Dec;52(6):319-324. doi: 10.1080/2000656X.2018.1493388. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
6
Cultural adaptation and validation of Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale for Turkish use.《患者及观察者瘢痕评估量表》在土耳其语环境下的文化调适与效度验证
Burns. 2018 Aug;44(5):1352-1356. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.02.026. Epub 2018 Mar 24.
7
Patient-reported scar quality of adults after burn injuries: A five-year multicenter follow-up study.成人烧伤后患者报告的瘢痕质量:一项为期五年的多中心随访研究。
Wound Repair Regen. 2019 Jul;27(4):406-414. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12709. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
8
Cross-cultural adaptation, reproducibility and validation of the Italian version of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS).跨文化调适、可重复性和意大利版患者与观察者瘢痕评估量表(POSAS)的验证。
Int Wound J. 2017 Dec;14(6):1262-1268. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12795. Epub 2017 Aug 6.
9
Rasch analysis of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) in burn scars.烧伤瘢痕患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表(POSAS)的 Rasch 分析。
Qual Life Res. 2012 Feb;21(1):13-23. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9924-5. Epub 2011 May 20.
10
Differential item functioning in the Observer Scale of the POSAS for different scar types.不同瘢痕类型在POSAS观察者量表中的项目功能差异。
Qual Life Res. 2014 Sep;23(7):2037-45. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0637-4. Epub 2014 Feb 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Topical for Postoperative Wound Healing: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.局部应用于术后伤口愈合:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Foot Ankle Orthop. 2025 Jun 26;10(2):24730114251345821. doi: 10.1177/24730114251345821. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
The Reconstruction of Various Complex Full-Thickness Skin Defects with a Biodegradable Temporising Matrix: A Case Series.使用可生物降解的临时基质修复各种复杂的全层皮肤缺损:病例系列
Eur Burn J. 2025 May 14;6(2):24. doi: 10.3390/ebj6020024.
3
Intraindividual Perception of Open versus Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy (PERCEPTION Trial): An Important Complementing Perspective to Randomized Controlled Trials.
个体对开放性与机器人辅助部分肾切除术的感知(PERCEPTION试验):对随机对照试验的一个重要补充视角。
Urol Int. 2025 Apr 6:1-10. doi: 10.1159/000545583.
4
Development of the Observer Scales of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale: An International Delphi Study.患者及观察者瘢痕评估量表的观察者量表开发:一项国际德尔菲研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Feb 28;13(2):e6416. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006416. eCollection 2025 Feb.
5
Efficiency of Early Sequential Laser Treatment for Facial Linear Scars in Cross-Sectional Regions.面部横断面区域线性瘢痕早期序贯激光治疗的疗效
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2025 Feb;24(2):e70053. doi: 10.1111/jocd.70053.
6
A framework for optimizing postoperative scars: A Therapist's perspective.优化术后疤痕的框架:治疗师的视角
J Hand Microsurg. 2024 Oct 26;17(1):100163. doi: 10.1016/j.jham.2024.100163. eCollection 2025 Jan.
7
Long-Term Outcome of Anterior Chest Keloid Excision Using Intercostal Artery Perforator Propeller Flaps.使用肋间动脉穿支推进皮瓣切除胸前瘢痕疙瘩的长期疗效
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Apr;49(7):2097-2103. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04574-1. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
8
Shear Wave Elastography of the Skin following Radial Forearm Free Flap Surgery in Transgender Patients: Observational Study.变性患者桡侧前臂游离皮瓣手术后皮肤的剪切波弹性成像:观察性研究。
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 20;13(16):4903. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164903.
9
Revision of the Advanced Cancer Patients' Distress Scale (ACPDS): a mixed-methods study among palliative patients and healthcare professionals in Germany.晚期癌症患者痛苦量表(ACPDS)修订版:德国姑息治疗患者和医疗保健专业人员的混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 4;13(4):e066998. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066998.
10
Development of the Patient Scale of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) 3.0: a qualitative study.患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表(POSAS)3.0 患者量表的制定:一项定性研究。
Qual Life Res. 2023 Feb;32(2):583-592. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03244-6. Epub 2022 Nov 10.