Bailey Sarah A, Brown Lyndsay, Campbell Marnie L, Canning-Clode João, Carlton James T, Castro Nuno, Chinho Paula, Chan Farrah T, Creed Joel C, Curd Amelia, Darling John, Fofonoff Paul, Galil Bella S, Hewitt Chad L, Inglis Graeme J, Keith Inti, Mandrak Nicholas E, Marchini Agnese, McKenzie Cynthia H, Occhipinti-Ambrogi Anna, Ojaveer Henn, Pires-Teixeira Larissa M, Robinson Tamara B, Ruiz Gregory M, Seaward Kimberley, Schwindt Evangelina, Son Mikhail O, Therriault Thomas W, Zhan Aibin
Great Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Burlington, ON, Canada.
Marine Lab, Marine Scotland Sci, Aberdeen, UK.
Divers Distrib. 2020 Dec;26(12):1780-1797. doi: 10.1111/ddi.13167.
The introduction of aquatic non-indigenous species (ANS) has become a major driver for global changes in species biogeography. We examined spatial patterns and temporal trends of ANS detections since 1965 to inform conservation policy and management.
Global.
We assembled an extensive dataset of first records of detection of ANS (1965-2015) across 49 aquatic ecosystems, including the (a) year of first collection, (b) population status and (c) potential pathway(s) of introduction. Data were analysed at global and regional levels to assess patterns of detection rate, richness and transport pathways.
An annual mean of 43 (±16 ) primary detections of ANS occurred-one new detection every 8.4 days for 50 years. The global rate of detections was relatively stable during 1965-1995, but increased rapidly after this time, peaking at roughly 66 primary detections per year during 2005-2010 and then declining marginally. Detection rates were variable within and across regions through time. Arthropods, molluscs and fishes were the most frequently reported ANS. Most ANS were likely introduced as stowaways in ships' ballast water or biofouling, although direct evidence is typically absent.
This synthesis highlights the magnitude of recent ANS detections, yet almost certainly represents an underestimate as many ANS go unreported due to limited search effort and diminishing taxonomic expertise. Temporal rates of detection are also confounded by reporting lags, likely contributing to the lower detection rate observed in recent years. There is a critical need to implement standardized, repeated methods across regions and taxa to improve the quality of global-scale comparisons and sustain core measures over longer time-scales. It will be fundamental to fill in knowledge gaps given that invasion data representing broad regions of the world's oceans are not yet readily available and to maintain knowledge pipelines for adaptive management.
水生非本土物种(ANS)的引入已成为全球物种生物地理学变化的主要驱动因素。我们研究了自1965年以来ANS被发现的空间格局和时间趋势,以为保护政策和管理提供参考。
全球。
我们收集了一个广泛的数据集,涵盖49个水生生态系统中ANS首次被发现的记录(1965 - 2015年),包括(a)首次采集年份、(b)种群状况以及(c)引入的潜在途径。在全球和区域层面分析数据,以评估发现率、丰富度和传播途径的格局。
平均每年有43次(±16次)ANS的首次发现——50年间每8.4天就有一次新发现。1965 - 1995年期间全球发现率相对稳定,但此后迅速上升,在2005 - 2010年期间每年约66次首次发现达到峰值,随后略有下降。不同时期内和不同区域间的发现率存在差异。节肢动物、软体动物和鱼类是最常被报告的ANS。尽管通常缺乏直接证据,但大多数ANS可能是作为偷渡者随船舶压舱水或生物污损被引入的。
这项综合研究突出了近期ANS发现的规模,但几乎可以肯定这是一个低估,因为由于搜索工作有限和分类学专业知识的减少,许多ANS未被报告。发现的时间率也因报告滞后而受到混淆,这可能是近年来观察到较低发现率的原因之一。迫切需要在各区域和分类群中实施标准化、重复的方法,以提高全球尺度比较的质量,并在更长时间尺度上维持核心指标。鉴于代表世界海洋广大区域的入侵数据尚不可得,填补知识空白并维持用于适应性管理的知识渠道至关重要。