• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

灾后(不)流动意愿与能力形成:南加州野火案例研究

Post-disaster (im)mobility aspiration and capability formation: case study of Southern California wildfire.

作者信息

Tinoco Nick

机构信息

Department of Sociology, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA USA.

出版信息

Popul Environ. 2023;45(2):4. doi: 10.1007/s11111-023-00416-5. Epub 2023 Apr 11.

DOI:10.1007/s11111-023-00416-5
PMID:37091045
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10107593/
Abstract

Scholarship on the environmental dimensions of migration demonstrates the complex interplay of climatic and non-climatic factors which combine to create a potential for migration. Yet in times of environmental crisis or change, not everyone aspires to or is capable of moving to reduce their vulnerability. When, why, and how populations vulnerable to hazard risks decide not to migrate remains a significant gap in our understanding of the migration-environment relationship. Analysis of data from 38 qualitative interviews shows how Los Angeles County residents-after surviving the 2018 Woolsey Fire-developed aspirations to stay and/or rebuild, depending on the attachments and meanings associated with their communities. This paper also seeks to clarify the concept of capabilities to stay by considering separately the capabilities to return and rebuild from the capabilities to cultivate preparedness. Many who stayed also worked to strengthen community resilience to alleviate concerns of future wildfire risk. Some residents expressed individual commitments to stay and defend homes during future fires, while well-equipped volunteer fire brigades have proliferated in more affluent areas. Community mobilizations pressured local government and fire services to address the perceived institutional failure during previous fire responses and fostered feelings of collective efficacy among residents which increased their confidence to remain in high wildfire risk communities.

摘要

关于移民环境维度的学术研究表明,气候因素和非气候因素相互作用复杂,共同造就了移民的可能性。然而,在环境危机或变化时期,并非所有人都渴望或有能力迁移以降低自身脆弱性。易受灾害风险影响的人群在何时、为何以及如何决定不迁移,这在我们对移民与环境关系的理解中仍是一个重大空白。对38次定性访谈数据的分析表明,洛杉矶县居民在经历2018年伍尔西大火后,如何根据与社区的情感纽带和意义形成了留下来和/或重建家园的愿望。本文还试图通过分别考虑回迁和重建的能力与培养备灾能力,来厘清留下来的能力这一概念。许多留下来的人还努力增强社区复原力,以减轻对未来野火风险的担忧。一些居民表示个人承诺在未来火灾期间留下来保卫家园,而装备精良的志愿消防队在较富裕地区大量涌现。社区动员向地方政府和消防部门施压,要求解决此前火灾应对中被认为的制度失灵问题,并在居民中培养了集体效能感,增强了他们留在野火高风险社区的信心。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a7c/10107593/27b5d560b3e6/11111_2023_416_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a7c/10107593/27b5d560b3e6/11111_2023_416_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a7c/10107593/27b5d560b3e6/11111_2023_416_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Post-disaster (im)mobility aspiration and capability formation: case study of Southern California wildfire.灾后(不)流动意愿与能力形成:南加州野火案例研究
Popul Environ. 2023;45(2):4. doi: 10.1007/s11111-023-00416-5. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
2
After the fire: A qualitative study of the role of long-term recovery organizations in addressing rural communities' post-wildfire needs.火灾之后:一项关于长期恢复组织在满足农村社区野火后需求中作用的定性研究
Environ Res Health. 2023 Jun 1;1(2):021009. doi: 10.1088/2752-5309/acd2f7. Epub 2023 May 30.
3
Does Wildfire Open a Policy Window? Local Government and Community Adaptation After Fire in the United States.野火是否开启了政策窗口?美国火灾后的地方政府和社区适应
Environ Manage. 2018 Aug;62(2):210-228. doi: 10.1007/s00267-018-1030-9. Epub 2018 May 15.
4
Factors affecting community-agency trust before, during and after a wildfire: an Australian case study.影响野火前、中、后社区与机构间信任的因素:一项澳大利亚案例研究。
J Environ Manage. 2013 Nov 30;130:10-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.037. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
5
Public engagement in neighbourhood level wildfire mitigation and preparedness: case studies from Canada, the US and Australia.公众参与邻里野火减灾和准备:来自加拿大、美国和澳大利亚的案例研究。
J Environ Manage. 2011 Oct;92(10):2524-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.05.017.
6
Pre- and post-fire pollutant loads in an urban fringe watershed in Southern California.南加州城市边缘流域火灾前后的污染物负荷。
Environ Monit Assess. 2013 Dec;185(12):10131-45. doi: 10.1007/s10661-013-3318-9. Epub 2013 Aug 4.
7
Who Among the Elderly Is Most Vulnerable to Exposure to and Health Risks of Fine Particulate Matter From Wildfire Smoke?老年人中谁最容易受到野火烟雾中细颗粒物的暴露及其健康风险的影响?
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Sep 15;186(6):730-735. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx141.
8
An Ecosystems and Vulnerable Populations Perspective on Solastalgia and Psychological Distress After a Wildfire.从生态系统与脆弱人群视角看森林火灾后的失乡病与心理困扰
Ecohealth. 2015 Dec;12(4):602-10. doi: 10.1007/s10393-015-1052-1. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
9
Mapping fires and American Red Cross aid using demographic indicators of vulnerability.利用脆弱性人口指标绘制火灾情况及美国红十字会援助情况图。
Disasters. 2017 Apr;41(2):409-426. doi: 10.1111/disa.12198. Epub 2016 May 12.
10
Situating hazard vulnerability: people's negotiations with wildfire environments in the U.S. southwest.定位灾害脆弱性:美国西南部民众与野火环境的协商
Environ Manage. 2009 Sep;44(3):441-55. doi: 10.1007/s00267-009-9333-5. Epub 2009 Jul 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Rare and highly destructive wildfires drive human migration in the U.S.美国罕见且极具破坏力的野火推动了人口迁徙
Nat Commun. 2024 Aug 5;15(1):6631. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-50630-4.
2
Critically assessing the idea of wildfire managed retreat.批判性地评估野火管理性撤离的理念。
Environ Res Lett. 2024 Apr 1;19(4):041005. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ad31d9. Epub 2024 Mar 28.

本文引用的文献

1
U.S. fires became larger, more frequent, and more widespread in the 2000s.在21世纪,美国火灾的规模变得更大、频率更高、分布更广。
Sci Adv. 2022 Mar 18;8(11):eabc0020. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abc0020. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
2
When rebuilding no longer means recovery: the stress of staying put after Hurricane Sandy.当重建不再意味着恢复:桑迪飓风过后原地不动的压力。
Clim Change. 2021;165(3):59. doi: 10.1007/s10584-021-03069-1. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
3
A theory of migration: the aspirations-capabilities framework.一种移民理论:愿望—能力框架。
Comp Migr Stud. 2021;9(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40878-020-00210-4. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
4
The Environmental Dimensions of Migration.移民的环境因素
Annu Rev Sociol. 2015 Aug;41:377-397. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112223. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
5
Putting trapped populations into place: Climate change and inter-district migration flows in Zambia.安置受困人口:赞比亚的气候变化与地区间移民流动
Reg Environ Change. 2018 Feb;18(2):533-546. doi: 10.1007/s10113-017-1224-3. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
6
International Climate Migration: Evidence for the Climate Inhibitor Mechanism and the Agricultural Pathway.国际气候移民:气候抑制机制与农业途径的证据
Popul Space Place. 2017 May;23(4). doi: 10.1002/psp.2033. Epub 2016 May 23.
7
Evacuation from Natural Disasters: A Systematic Review of the Literature.自然灾害人员撤离:文献系统综述。
Risk Anal. 2017 Apr;37(4):812-839. doi: 10.1111/risa.12654. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
8
Country-Specific Effects of Climate Variability on Human Migration.气候变化对人类迁徙的国别效应。
Clim Change. 2016 Apr;135(3):555-568. doi: 10.1007/s10584-015-1592-y. Epub 2016 Jan 9.
9
Attitudes towards relocation following Hurricane Sandy: should we stay or should we go?飓风桑迪过后对搬迁的态度:我们该留下还是离开?
Disasters. 2017 Jan;41(1):101-123. doi: 10.1111/disa.12186. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
10
Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy.社区与暴力犯罪:集体效能的多层次研究
Science. 1997 Aug 15;277(5328):918-24. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5328.918.