Suppr超能文献

发散性和聚合性思维过程中的阿尔法事件相关去同步化(ERS-ERD)模式取决于元控制方面的个体差异。

Alpha ERS-ERD Pattern during Divergent and Convergent Thinking Depends on Individual Differences on Metacontrol.

作者信息

Liu Chunlei, Lin Yuhong, Ye Chaoqun, Yang Jiaqin, He Wenguang

机构信息

School of Psychology, Qufu Normal University, Qufu 273165, China.

Key Laboratory of Modern Teaching Technology (Ministry of Education), Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710062, China.

出版信息

J Intell. 2023 Apr 19;11(4):74. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11040074.

Abstract

The role of metacontrol in creativity is theoretically assumed, but experimental evidence is still lacking. In this study, we investigated how metacontrol affects creativity from the perspective of individual differences. Sixty participants completed the metacontrol task, which was used to divide participants into a high-metacontrol group (HMC) versus a low (LMC) group. Then, these participants performed the alternate uses task (AUT; divergent thinking) and the remote associates test (RAT; convergent thinking), while their EEG results were recorded continuously. Regarding their behavior, the HMC group showed superior creative performance in the AUT and RAT, compared with the LMC group. For the electrophysiology, the HMC group showed larger stimulus-locked P1 and P3 amplitudes than the LMC group. Furthermore, the HMC group exhibited smaller alpha desynchronization (ERD) than the LMC group at the initial stages of the AUT task, followed by a flexible switching between alpha synchronization and desynchronization (ERS-ERD) during the process of selective retention in the AUT. In addition, the HMC group evoked smaller alpha ERD during the initial retrieval and the backtracking process in the RAT, associated with cognitive control adaptability. The aforementioned results indicate that metacontrol reliably contributes to the idea generation process, and HMC individuals could flexibly adjust their cognitive control strategies according to the demand for creative idea generation.

摘要

元控制在创造力中的作用在理论上已得到假设,但仍缺乏实验证据。在本研究中,我们从个体差异的角度调查了元控制如何影响创造力。60名参与者完成了元控制任务,该任务用于将参与者分为高元控制组(HMC)和低元控制组(LMC)。然后,这些参与者进行了替代用途任务(AUT;发散性思维)和远距离联想测验(RAT;聚合性思维),同时持续记录他们的脑电图结果。在行为方面,与LMC组相比,HMC组在AUT和RAT中表现出更优的创造性表现。在电生理学方面,HMC组比LMC组表现出更大的刺激锁定P1和P3波幅。此外,在AUT任务的初始阶段,HMC组比LMC组表现出更小的α去同步化(ERD),随后在AUT的选择性保留过程中,α同步化和去同步化(ERS-ERD)之间灵活切换。此外,在RAT的初始检索和回溯过程中,HMC组诱发的α ERD较小,这与认知控制适应性有关。上述结果表明,元控制确实有助于创意生成过程,并且HMC个体可以根据创意生成的需求灵活调整其认知控制策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1d6/10144848/9f8ab97d78c7/jintelligence-11-00074-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验