Appelbaum P C, Stavitz J, Bentz M S, von Kuster L C
Med Microbiol Immunol. 1981;169(3):163-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02123589.
Four commercial kits--Oxi/Ferm (OF), API 20E (AP), Minitek (MT), Flow N/F (NF) were evaluated, without additional tests, for identification of 105 opportunistic Gram-negative non-fermentative rods. Of correctly identified 42% of strains, with 35% as part (but not first) of a spectrum of identifications (SI) and 23% incorrect identification. MT yielded 75% correct identification, with 12% SI and 13% incorrect. AP correctly identified 64% of strains, with 26% SI, 10% incorrect. NF correctly speciated 70% of strains, with 24% SI, 6% incorrect. All 4 methods show deficiencies in identification of these rare but increasingly clinically encountered organisms. Addition of new tests/modification of existing ones would render these systems more capable of identifying this organisms group.
对四种商用试剂盒——Oxi/Ferm（OF）、API 20E（AP）、Minitek（MT）、Flow N/F（NF）进行了评估，无需额外测试，以鉴定105株机会性革兰氏阴性非发酵菌。正确鉴定出42%的菌株，其中35%作为部分（但不是首个）鉴定谱（SI），23%鉴定错误。MT的正确鉴定率为75%，其中12%为SI，13%鉴定错误。AP正确鉴定出64%的菌株，其中26%为SI，10%鉴定错误。NF正确鉴定出70%的菌株，其中24%为SI，6%鉴定错误。所有这四种方法在鉴定这些罕见但临床中越来越常见的微生物时都存在不足。增加新测试/修改现有测试将使这些系统更有能力鉴定这类微生物。
