• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用选定的革兰氏阴性菌对氧化/发酵管系统进行评估。

Evaluation of the oxi/ferm tube system with selected Gram-negative bacteria.

作者信息

Oberhofer T R, Rowen J W, Cunningham G F, Higbee J W

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Dec;6(6):559-66. doi: 10.1128/jcm.6.6.559-566.1977.

DOI:10.1128/jcm.6.6.559-566.1977
PMID:338624
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC274824/
Abstract

The Oxi/Ferm test system was evaluated for accuracy and reliability for identification of nonfermentative and oxidase-positive fermentative bacteria by using 375 bacterial strains obtained from stock culture and clinical specimens. The Oxi/Ferm system is a compartmentalized tube containing eight media to provide nine biochemical test results. When combined with the oxidase test, the results corresponding to the positive reactions are totaled and the composite number is located in the coding manual to identify the organisms. The 375 isolates studied were evaluated for accuracy of identification, using both the original and revised code manuals. In comparison with the conventional media used, there was 100% correlation in tests for hydrogen sulfide and indole production, over 96% for nitrogen gas, arginine, and urease, over 92% for xylose and dextrose oxidation, and less than 90% for citrate utilization and dextrose fermentation. There was an overall accuracy in identification of 89.3% using the original manual, with accuracy revised slightly upward to 90.7% using the revised manual. There was 100% accuracy in identification with 44.0% of the strains tested (11 species) using the original manual and with 66.1% (16 species) using the revised manual. Thirteen of the 40 original misidentifications and 14 of 35 revised misidentifications resulted from failure to code and were unidentifiable by Oxi/Ferm. The remainder were incorrectly identified or could not be differentiated from closely related strains. Eleven strains of Alcaligenes odorans were correctly identified using the original code, whereas no code was provided in the revised manual. The Oxi/Ferm system is both simple and rapid and is satisfactory for identification of the more common isolates.

摘要

通过使用从保藏培养物和临床标本中获得的375株细菌菌株,对Oxi/Ferm检测系统在鉴定非发酵菌和氧化酶阳性发酵菌方面的准确性和可靠性进行了评估。Oxi/Ferm系统是一种分隔管,包含八种培养基,可提供九种生化检测结果。当与氧化酶检测相结合时,将对应阳性反应的结果相加,并在编码手册中查找复合数字以鉴定微生物。使用原始和修订后的编码手册,对所研究的375株分离株进行了鉴定准确性评估。与使用的传统培养基相比,硫化氢和吲哚产生试验的相关性为100%,氮气、精氨酸和尿素酶试验的相关性超过96%,木糖和葡萄糖氧化试验的相关性超过92%,柠檬酸盐利用和葡萄糖发酵试验的相关性低于90%。使用原始手册时,总体鉴定准确率为89.3%,使用修订手册时准确率略有提高至90.7%。使用原始手册时,44.0%(11种)的测试菌株鉴定准确率为100%,使用修订手册时为66.1%(16种)。40例原始错误鉴定中的13例和35例修订后错误鉴定中的14例是由于未能编码而无法通过Oxi/Ferm鉴定。其余的要么鉴定错误,要么无法与密切相关的菌株区分开来。使用原始编码正确鉴定了11株恶臭产碱菌,而修订后的手册中未提供编码。Oxi/Ferm系统既简单又快速,对于鉴定较常见的分离株令人满意。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the oxi/ferm tube system with selected Gram-negative bacteria.使用选定的革兰氏阴性菌对氧化/发酵管系统进行评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Dec;6(6):559-66. doi: 10.1128/jcm.6.6.559-566.1977.
2
Evaluation of the Oxi/Ferm tube system for identification of nonfermentative Gram-negative bacilli.用于鉴定非发酵革兰氏阴性杆菌的Oxi/Ferm管系统的评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Jun;7(6):533-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.7.6.533-538.1978.
3
The N/F and Oxi/Ferm systems for identification of oxidative-fermentative Gram-negative rods: a comparative study.用于鉴定氧化发酵革兰氏阴性杆菌的N/F和Oxi/Ferm系统:一项比较研究。
Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B. 1982 Oct;90(5):341-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1982.tb00129.x.
4
Comparison of the Oxi/Ferm and N/F systems for identification of infrequently encountered nonfermentative and oxidase-positive fermentative bacilli.用于鉴定罕见非发酵菌和氧化酶阳性发酵菌的Oxi/Ferm系统与N/F系统的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Mar;15(3):384-90. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.3.384-390.1982.
5
Identification of Gram-negative non-fermenters and oxidase-positive fermenters by the Oxi/Ferm tube.使用氧化/发酵管鉴定革兰氏阴性非发酵菌和氧化酶阳性发酵菌。
J Clin Pathol. 1979 Jan;32(1):78-85. doi: 10.1136/jcp.32.1.78.
6
Use of the API 20E, Oxi/Ferm, and Minitek systems to identify nonfermentative and oxidase-positive fermentative bacteria: seven years of experience.使用API 20E、Oxi/Ferm和Minitek系统鉴定非发酵菌和氧化酶阳性发酵菌:七年经验
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1983 Sep;1(3):241-56. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(83)90024-x.
7
Comparison of the API 20E and Oxi/Ferm systems in identification of nonfermentative and oxidase-positive fermentative bacteria.API 20E系统与Oxi/Ferm系统在鉴定非发酵菌和氧化酶阳性发酵菌中的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Feb;9(2):220-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.9.2.220-226.1979.
8
Evaluation of two test-kits--API and Oxi Ferm tube--for identification of oxidative-fermentative Gram-negative rods.评估两种检测试剂盒——API和氧化发酵管——用于鉴定氧化发酵革兰氏阴性杆菌。
Med Microbiol Immunol. 1977 Jul 18;163(2):93-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02121824.
9
Accuracy and reproducibility of the Oxi/Ferm system in identifying a select group of unusual gram-negative bacilli.Oxi/Ferm系统在鉴定一组特定的罕见革兰氏阴性杆菌中的准确性和可重复性。
J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Feb;9(2):180-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.9.2.180-185.1979.
10
Comparison of three methods for identifying nonfermenting gram-negative rods.
Can J Microbiol. 1978 Oct;24(10):1140-4. doi: 10.1139/m78-186.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the Oxi/Ferm and N/F systems for identification of infrequently encountered nonfermentative and oxidase-positive fermentative bacilli.用于鉴定罕见非发酵菌和氧化酶阳性发酵菌的Oxi/Ferm系统与N/F系统的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Mar;15(3):384-90. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.3.384-390.1982.
2
Identification of Pasteurella multocida and Pasteurella haemolytica by API 20E, Minitek, and Oxi/Ferm systems.采用API 20E、Minitek和Oxi/Ferm系统鉴定多杀性巴氏杆菌和溶血巴氏杆菌。
J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Mar;13(3):433-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.3.433-437.1981.
3
Four methods for identification of gram-negative nonfermenting rods: organisms more commonly encountered in clinical specimens.革兰阴性非发酵菌的四种鉴定方法:临床标本中更常见的微生物
J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Aug;12(2):271-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.12.2.271-278.1980.
4
Evaluation of the Minitek system for identification of nonfermentative and nonenteric fermentative Gram-negative bacteria.用于鉴定非发酵及非肠道发酵革兰氏阴性菌的Minitek系统评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Oct;12(4):509-16. doi: 10.1128/jcm.12.4.509-516.1980.
5
Accuracy of a rapid carbohydrate oxidation microtube method for identification of nonfermentative gram-negative bacilli.一种用于鉴定非发酵革兰氏阴性杆菌的快速碳水化合物氧化微管法的准确性
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Jan;15(1):43-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.1.43-47.1982.
6
Bacteria on closed-boll and commercially harvested cotton.封闭棉铃和商业采收棉花上的细菌。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Aug;44(2):355-62. doi: 10.1128/aem.44.2.355-362.1982.
7
Evaluation of the rapid NFT system for identification of gram-negative, nonfermenting rods.用于鉴定革兰氏阴性非发酵菌的快速NFT系统评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Oct;20(4):730-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.4.730-734.1984.
8
Comparison of Rapid NFT system and conventional methods for identification of nonsaccharolytic gram-negative bacteria.快速NFT系统与传统方法用于鉴定非糖分解革兰氏阴性菌的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Dec;24(6):1089-92. doi: 10.1128/jcm.24.6.1089-1092.1986.
9
Critical evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system gram-negative identification card for identification of glucose-nonfermenting gram-negative rods.对用于鉴定葡萄糖非发酵革兰氏阴性杆菌的自动微生物系统革兰氏阴性鉴定卡的批判性评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Feb;23(2):251-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.2.251-257.1986.
10
Nonfermentative bacilli: evaluation of three systems for identification.非发酵杆菌:三种鉴定系统的评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Aug;10(2):147-54. doi: 10.1128/jcm.10.2.147-154.1979.

本文引用的文献

1
Characterization of saccharolytic nonfermentative bacteria associated with man.与人类相关的解糖型非发酵菌的特性分析
Can J Microbiol. 1970 May;16(5):351-62. doi: 10.1139/m70-062.
2
Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method.采用标准化单纸片法进行抗生素敏感性试验。
Am J Clin Pathol. 1966 Apr;45(4):493-6.
3
Multi-biochemical test system for distinguishing enteric and other gram-negative bacilli.用于鉴别肠道及其他革兰氏阴性杆菌的多生化检测系统。
Appl Microbiol. 1971 Sep;22(3):408-14. doi: 10.1128/am.22.3.408-414.1971.
4
Evaluation of the enterotube system for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.用于鉴定肠杆菌科细菌成员的肠管系统评估。
Appl Microbiol. 1971 Jul;22(1):96-9. doi: 10.1128/am.22.1.96-99.1971.
5
Comparison of the R-B system and the Enterotube for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
Am J Clin Pathol. 1974 Feb;61(2):218-22. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/61.2.218.
6
Clinical laboratory experience with the improved Enterotube.改良型肠管培养系统的临床实验室经验
Appl Microbiol. 1973 Jun;25(6):896-9. doi: 10.1128/am.25.6.896-899.1973.
7
Evaluation of the redesigned enterotube--a system for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.重新设计的肠道菌鉴定管系统的评估——一种用于鉴定肠杆菌科细菌的系统。
Appl Microbiol. 1973 Feb;25(2):301-4. doi: 10.1128/am.25.2.301-304.1973.
8
Evaluation of the rapid decarboxylase and dihydrolase test for the differentiation of nonfermentative bacteria.用于非发酵菌鉴别的快速脱羧酶和脱氢酶试验的评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1976 Feb;3(2):137-42. doi: 10.1128/jcm.3.2.137-142.1976.
9
Motility-indole-lysine-sulfide medium.动力-吲哚-赖氨酸-硫化物培养基
J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Sep;2(3):266-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.2.3.266-267.1975.
10
Pseudomonas species in clinical microbiology.临床微生物学中的假单胞菌属
Mt Sinai J Med. 1976 Nov-Dec;43(6):710-26.