Suppr超能文献

影响口腔微生物组分析的因素:从唾液采样方法到下一代测序平台。

Factors influencing oral microbiome analysis: from saliva sampling methods to next-generation sequencing platforms.

机构信息

Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 21;13(1):10086. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37246-2.

Abstract

The exploration of oral microbiome has been increasing due to its relatedness with various systemic diseases, but standardization of saliva sampling for microbiome analysis has not been established, contributing to the lack of data comparability. Here, we evaluated the factors that influence the microbiome data. Saliva samples were collected by the two collection methods (passive drooling and mouthwash) using three saliva-preservation methods (OMNIgene, DNA/RNA shield, and simple collection). A total of 18 samples were sequenced by both Illumina short-read and Nanopore long-read next-generation sequencing (NGS). The component of the oral microbiome in each sample was compared with alpha and beta diversity and the taxonomic abundances, to find out the effects of factors on oral microbiome data. The alpha diversity indices of the mouthwash sample were significantly higher than that of the drooling group with both short-read and long-read NGS, while no significant differences in microbial diversities were found between the three saliva-preservation methods. Our study shows mouthwash and simple collection are not inferior to other sample collection and saliva-preservation methods, respectively. This result is promising since the convenience and cost-effectiveness of mouthwash and simple collection can simplify the saliva sample preparation, which would greatly help clinical operators and lab workers.

摘要

由于口腔微生物组与各种系统性疾病有关,因此对其的研究不断增加,但尚未建立用于微生物组分析的唾液采样标准化方法,这导致数据的可比性较差。在这里,我们评估了影响微生物组数据的因素。使用两种收集方法(被动流涎和漱口)和三种唾液保存方法(OMNIgene、DNA/RNA 保护剂和简单收集)收集唾液样本。总共对 18 个样本进行了 Illumina 短读长和 Nanopore 长读长下一代测序(NGS)测序。将每个样本的口腔微生物组组成与 alpha 和 beta 多样性以及分类丰度进行比较,以找出这些因素对口腔微生物组数据的影响。与短读长和长读长 NGS 相比,漱口样本的 alpha 多样性指数均明显高于流涎组,而三种唾液保存方法之间的微生物多样性无显著差异。我们的研究表明,漱口和简单收集分别与其他样本收集和唾液保存方法一样好。由于漱口和简单收集的便利性和成本效益可以简化唾液样本的制备,这将极大地帮助临床操作人员和实验室工作人员,因此这一结果很有前景。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa18/10284873/956367e34318/41598_2023_37246_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验