Li Ya, Feng Yujia, Li Shu, Ma Yulin, Lin Jiesheng, Wan Jing, Zhao Min
Department of Cardiology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Department of Intensive Care Unit, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jun 27;10:1140215. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1140215. eCollection 2023.
Dyslipidemia is a key risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD). This study aimed to investigate the correlation between the atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) and the severity of CAD.
2,491 patients were enrolled in this study and analyzed retrospectively, including 665 non-CAD patients as the control group and 1,826 CAD patients. The CAD patients were classified into three subgroups according to tertiles of SYNTAX score (SS). Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) was defined as serum total cholesterol (TC) minus serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), atherogenic index (AI) was defined as the ratio of non-HDL-C to HDL-C; AIP was defined as the logarithm of the ratio of the concentration of triglyceride (TG) to HDL-C; lipoprotein combine index (LCI) was defined as the ratio of TC∗TG∗ low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL)to HDL-C; Castelli Risk Index I (CRI I) was defined as the ratio of TC to HDL-C; Castelli Risk Index II (CRI II) was defined as the ratio of LDL-C to HDL-C.
The levels of AIP ( < 0.001), AI ( < 0.001), and LCI (= 0.013) were higher in the CAD group compared with the non-CAD group. The Spearman correlation analysis showed that AIP ( = 0.075, < 0.001), AI ( = 0.132, < 0.001), and LCI ( = 0.072, = 0.001) were positively correlated with SS. The multivariate logistic regression model showed CRI I (OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.03-1.19, = 0.005), CRI II (OR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.15-1.39, < 0.001), AI (OR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.17-1.40, < 0.001), AIP (OR: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.38-3.07, < 0.001), and LCI (OR: 1.01, 95% CI: 1.01-1.02, < 0.001) were independent predictors of severity of CAD After adjusting various confounders.
CRI I, CRI II, AIP, AI, and LCI were independent predictors of the severity of CAD, which could be used as a biomarker for the evaluation of the severity of CAD.
血脂异常是冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的关键危险因素。本研究旨在探讨血浆致动脉粥样硬化指数(AIP)与CAD严重程度之间的相关性。
本研究纳入2491例患者并进行回顾性分析,包括665例非CAD患者作为对照组和1826例CAD患者。CAD患者根据SYNTAX评分(SS)三分位数分为三个亚组。非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(Non-HDL-C)定义为血清总胆固醇(TC)减去血清高密度脂蛋白胆固醇;致动脉粥样硬化指数(AI)定义为Non-HDL-C与HDL-C的比值;AIP定义为甘油三酯(TG)浓度与HDL-C比值的对数;脂蛋白综合指数(LCI)定义为TC∗TG∗低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL)与HDL-C的比值;卡斯泰利风险指数I(CRI I)定义为TC与HDL-C的比值;卡斯泰利风险指数II(CRI II)定义为LDL-C与HDL-C的比值。
与非CAD组相比,CAD组的AIP(<0.001)、AI(<0.001)和LCI(=0.013)水平更高。Spearman相关性分析显示,AIP(=0.075,<0.001)、AI(=0.132,<0.001)和LCI(=0.072,=0.001)与SS呈正相关。多因素logistic回归模型显示,调整各种混杂因素后,CRI I(OR:1.11,95%CI:1.03-1.19,=0.005)、CRI II(OR:1.26,95%CI:1.15-1.39,<0.001)、AI(OR:1.28,95%CI:1.17-1.40,<0.001)、AIP(OR:2.06,95%CI:1.38-3.07,<0.001)和LCI(OR:1.01,95%CI:1.01-1.02,<0.001)是CAD严重程度的独立预测因素。
CRI I、CRI II、AIP、AI和LCI是CAD严重程度的独立预测因素,可作为评估CAD严重程度的生物标志物。