Suppr超能文献

在 COVID-19 大流行期间患者对远程医疗的看法:一项基于社区的混合方法研究。

Patient perspectives on telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods community-based study.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, Rotterdam, 3000 CA, The Netherlands.

Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jul 27;23(1):803. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09794-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Detailed community-based perspectives on patient experiences with telemedicine are currently lacking, yet essential to assess clinical applicability of telemedicine during and beyond pandemics, alike COVID-19. The aim of this study was to expose patient perspectives on virtual compared to in-person consultations, including determinants of these preferences.

METHODS

We invited 5864 participants of the population-based Rotterdam Study to fill in a validated questionnaire using both close-ended and free-text questions. The questionnaire was sent on 30 July 2020, following a period of lockdowns and closures of non-essential workplaces. It assessed preferences for physician contact, healthcare utilisation, socioeconomic factors, and overall health. Those who experienced at least one virtual consultation (telephone or video call) between March 2020 and the beginning of July 2020 were asked whether those consultations were more, equally or less pleasant than in-person consultations, and to detail their experiences through free-text comments. These narrative data were examined using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

4514 participants completed the questionnaire (response rate 77.0%, 58.7% women, mean age 70.8 ± 10.5 years). 1103 participants (24.4%) reported having had experience with virtual consultations. Half of these participants considered virtual consultations less pleasant than in-person consultations (N = 556; 50.4%), while 11.5% found it more pleasant. In total, we coded free-text comments of 752 participants. Prominent themes behind patient preferences for virtual or in-person consultations were lack of nonverbal communication, lack of physical examination, consultation scheduling, personal circumstances, and the presence of somatic and/or language barriers.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the experiences of a large elderly patient population, we showed that preference for virtual or in-person consultations is dependent on personal and situational variety, and their interplay. Healthcare providers should consider patients' complex care needs and evaluate the potential added value of nonverbal communication and physical examination before scheduling a virtual consultation.

摘要

背景

目前缺乏详细的基于社区的患者对远程医疗体验的观点,但在大流行期间和之后评估远程医疗的临床适用性至关重要,就像 COVID-19 一样。本研究的目的是揭示患者对虚拟与面对面咨询的看法,包括这些偏好的决定因素。

方法

我们邀请了 5864 名参与人群为基础的鹿特丹研究的参与者使用封闭式和开放式问题填写一份经过验证的问卷。该问卷于 2020 年 7 月 30 日发送,正值封锁和非必要工作场所关闭期间。它评估了对医生联系、医疗保健利用、社会经济因素和整体健康的偏好。那些在 2020 年 3 月至 2020 年 7 月初期间至少经历过一次虚拟咨询(电话或视频通话)的人被问及这些咨询是否比面对面咨询更愉快、同等愉快或不那么愉快,并通过自由文本评论详细说明他们的体验。使用主题分析对这些叙述性数据进行了检查。

结果

4514 名参与者完成了问卷(回复率为 77.0%,女性占 58.7%,平均年龄为 70.8±10.5 岁)。1103 名参与者(24.4%)报告有过虚拟咨询经验。其中一半的参与者认为虚拟咨询不如面对面咨询愉快(N=556;50.4%),而 11.5%的人认为虚拟咨询更愉快。总共,我们对 752 名参与者的自由文本评论进行了编码。患者对虚拟或面对面咨询偏好的突出主题是缺乏非语言交流、缺乏身体检查、咨询安排、个人情况以及躯体和/或语言障碍的存在。

结论

根据大量老年患者的经验,我们表明,对虚拟或面对面咨询的偏好取决于个人和情况的多样性及其相互作用。医疗保健提供者在安排虚拟咨询之前,应考虑患者的复杂护理需求,并评估非语言交流和身体检查的潜在附加价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be50/10375760/f034512adc7b/12913_2023_9794_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验