Suppr超能文献

与其他根管内药物相比,芦荟对[具体细菌]的抗菌效果:系统评价与荟萃分析。 (注:原文中“against”后缺少具体细菌名称)

Anti-bacterial efficacy of Aloe vera against in comparison to other intracanal medicaments: A systematic review and -analysis.

作者信息

Tariq Rabia, Khurshid Zohaib, Ahmed Farooqui Waqas, Adanir Nejdet

机构信息

Department of Research, School of Public Health, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi 74200, Pakistan.

Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Implantology, College of Dentistry, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Saudi Dent J. 2023 Jul;35(5):451-467. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.05.007. Epub 2023 May 16.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This review article aims to evaluate the antibacterial efficacy of Aloe vera against () in comparison to other intracanal medicaments by assessing experimental in-vitro studies associated with the objective, many of which performed bacterial inoculation on extracted human teeth or directly on laboratory petri dishes.

MATERIALS & METHODS: Publications from 2012 to 2022 were retrieved from databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, and they were screened against our inclusion criteria, leading to the incorporation of 18 studies into the systematic review and nine into the -analysis. Colony-forming units (CFUs) in the Aloe vera group were compared with saline, sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), chlorhexidine (CHX), and calcium hydroxide (CaOH) using a -analysis (Stata software version 16.0), and forest plots were computed to record the sample size, mean and standard deviation value of the outcome CFU, and 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

This systematic review indicates that Aloe vera demonstrates bactericidal properties that are higher than or similar to those of saline and CaOH, but CHX, NaOCl, and propolis exhibited higher antibacterial properties against than Aloe vera. In a -analysis, Aloe vera showed a non-significantly lower CFU count than CaOH and saline (p > 0.05), while Aloe vera had a higher CFU count than CHX and NaOCl (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In summary, Aloe vera exhibits antibacterial capabilities against that are superior or equal to those of saline and CaOH, respectively, while CHX and NaOCl showed greater antibacterial efficacy against than Aloe vera (PROSPERO registration no. CRD42022314790).

摘要

引言

本综述文章旨在通过评估与该目标相关的体外实验研究,比较芦荟与其他根管内药物对()的抗菌效果,其中许多研究在拔除的人牙或直接在实验室培养皿上进行细菌接种。

材料与方法

从包括PubMed、Scopus和Cochrane图书馆在内的数据库中检索2012年至2022年的出版物,并根据纳入标准进行筛选,最终将18项研究纳入系统评价,9项纳入荟萃分析。使用荟萃分析(Stata软件版本16.0)将芦荟组中的菌落形成单位(CFU)与生理盐水、次氯酸钠(NaOCl)、氯己定(CHX)和氢氧化钙(CaOH)进行比较,并计算森林图以记录样本量、CFU结果的均值和标准差以及95%置信区间。

结果

该系统评价表明,芦荟具有杀菌特性,其杀菌性能高于或类似于生理盐水和CaOH,但CHX、NaOCl和蜂胶对()的抗菌性能高于芦荟。在荟萃分析中,芦荟的CFU计数比CaOH和生理盐水略低,但差异无统计学意义(p>0.05),而芦荟的CFU计数高于CHX和NaOCl(p>0.05)。

结论

总之,芦荟对()的抗菌能力分别优于或等同于生理盐水和CaOH,而CHX和NaOCl对()的抗菌效果比芦荟更强(PROSPERO注册号:CRD42022314790)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb64/10373152/6c3f10eee89d/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验